Posted on 03/20/2013 11:33:58 AM PDT by Red Badger
I wish that Ford would make a direct competitor to the Wrangler and call it a Bronco. That would be awesome.
I keep daydreaming about the viability of taking a new Wrangler Rubicon and trading out wheels, badging, front grill, etc., and turning it into a fake “2014 Ford Bronco”. Maybe a blue one, repainted as a modern take on the 69 Bronco, with white wheel arches and white top? That would be an awesome conversation starter... lol
No UAW made car......ever. They can steal my money through the government, but I won’t willingly give them one red cent.
VASTLY overrated reputation. Did not perform much better than the 428, at least on the street. Did not excel in NHRA classes, stock or superstock.
I knew 2 guys in Lansing with 428s, one in a Fairlane, one in a Mustang. Fairlane beat the Mustang by 2-4 lengths every time they ran. So the Mustang guy buys a 429 Mustang & wants to race me. I told him if he could beat his buddy he could try me. So they ran several times....yup, the Fairlane by 2-4 every time. He never got to run me, not that it woulda done any good.
Oh, if you have the time, check out Jay Leno's garage online. He has a buttload of videos, with great info on some of his, and other's, cars, including a lot of engine info. There are some REAL pinnacles of automotive excellence there.
That’s just beautiful.
Love the Mustang. My 2013 GT with 420hp 5.0 “Coyote” V8 and 6sp manual is my daily driver, and is the most fun I’ve ever had with my clothes on. It puts some joy into my commute. :)
You do realize that motor was highly detuned for the street cars right? The only reason it ever got into a street car at all was NASCAR’s rule about what constituted a production engine.
Actually the Boss 351 was the quicker of the two when you get right down to it. But open the hood on a 428 car, a Boss 351 or the Boss 429 and guess which all eyeballs shoot to?
OK, I’ll admit ‘pinnacle’ was hyperbole. But you must admit it was a pretty unique and impressive machine.
Yes, it is worse, IMHO. Want an $80,000.00 Camaro? That’s what it looks like from the rear. No big block option?
Obama has ruined the thinking at the GM design center. As expected...sigh!!!
This comes from someone who owned one of Corvette’s worst performance Corvette, the 1977 L-82 Corvette. I thoroughly rebuilt that car from the radiator, springs, everything, into a fire breathing 1977 sleeper with a 427 CI Big Block with nitrous..
Agreed, its sickening what the chief punk got away with the bondholders and the handpicked dealers that survived based on political contributions. My wife is retired GM white collar but I bought a KIA built in a RTW state. That said, the C7 looks pretty cool to me. Surprised they didnt cancel it to save the planet.
And the mid 80s looked like stablemate Firebirds. But I’ll concede the $80,000 point as there is no arguing that.
The big block gasser has been dead a long time, even in pickups.
The 638 hp / 604 lb-ft aluminum small block seems adequate for most (that's the current rating, I assume the 2014 will be more).
Oops. forgot one. When was the last ‘Big Block’ option available? 73ish? That’s no biggie at this point. The mighty L88 was less powerful than the Z1s anyway so no great loss from a pure power perspective.
Though I’d rather have the L88 roaring in my face ;)
I know what you mean, but I guess I'm just not a purist about such things. Despite the flattened, sleeker shape of the '84 Vette, I fell in love with the thing anyway. When the styling later began to hearken back to its roots, I loved that too.
About the only Vettes I didn't much care for, were the late 70s, early 80s Vettes without the tail fin. I didn't exactly hate 'em, but they looked disfigured to me.
One sports car that I always thought GM should have built for mass consumption, was the Cadillac Cien:
Unfortunately, it was just a concept car that they used to draw design elements from for other (more watered down) models. GM could have stuck a Corvette badge on that thing, and the public would have gone gaga for it.
Don’t really know. After I sold my Corvette in 1991, I sort of lost interest, then the GM takeover....
That is certainly a lot of power out of a small block. I didn’t see anything in the Cormero article spouting those kind of numbers! Holy Moley.
Whoa there, pardner. Nice cars, but not a pinnacle. Highly doubtful ANY American car can lay that claim. The pinnacle has to be European, very hard no to give it to the Veyron by acclaim.
But Ford DOES have some great Mustangs, they are called Cobra Jets.....verrryyy expensive, limited production balls-out racers. And DAMN are they fast...8.5 seconds with a 5.0 Liter in Stock Eliminator - Awesome!! That is almost as fast as the 45 years old HemiCudas and HemiDarts.
Impressive looking beast in a 2095 sort of way.
I like the late 70s ear but ya...lack of a spoiler did them no favors. Nor did the smogged 305/350s.
Raced and wiped a couple of them on a freeway with my F250. Acceleration AND top end. Which speaks pretty poorly for “America’s Sports Car” of the era. I won’t mention the 485 HP FE Ford Big block that particular truck had under the hood though... ;)
This looks like my 1990 NSX (yes I purchased it in June 1990) on a overdose of steroids. I still have it and love it.
The 2015 NSX will put this vet to shame!
GM - Full Gear Stupid.
That is it?
Dull.
Pedestrian.
ORDINARY.
WORTHLESS.
Sucker Sheet Metal for the Stupid Class.
The only peole who will like it will be the paid for road and track magazine stooges.
Ditto
Well the 2015 NSX is a hybrid.
So at least the “earth people” will love it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.