Posted on 03/11/2013 2:24:52 PM PDT by NoRedTape
"Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), a member of the Democratic Partys leadership in the House of Representatives, suggested to Jason Mattera at a Feb. 13 womens rights rally that plans for an assault weapons ban and private-sales background checks were only the beginning of a broader gun control agenda extending to handguns as well."..............
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Is this a gutterwhore alert?
But they said they wouldn’t seize guns from innocent, law-abiding, non-violent citizens.
Simple: pass a law making all gun-ownership illegal -- then they can claim that they aren't persecuting the law-abiding, but the law breaking.
It's really easy to see what they're thinking.
Even more....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=JUST%20THE%20BEGINNING
They SAY abortion should be legal and RARE:
Why not take them at their word...? What is the mechanism for ENSURING that it is, indeed, rare...?
Shouldn’t confidential records (similar to form 4473) be kept and periodically POLICED, the better to ensure that abortion is not abused as a form of contraception..?
Why not take them at their word...?
They’re not EXTREMISTS, right..? This would be to assure the QUALITY of abortion, and to make sure it is RARE.
They’re not EXTREMISTS, right? Or ARE they...?
Surely they won’t reject this ONE LITTLE measure..?
They are showing thier hand once again, take notice!
What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts
This didn’t turn out well for the British in 1776...and I don’t think it will for the Libs in the present day.
More truth is leaking out from the Communists. I wonder if Canada would take Illinois in a trade for Alberta?
In order to assure women’s reproductive health, we should have REPRODUCTIVE POLICE:
They’ll be armed and badged. They’ll coordinate with clinics to assure clean and safe facilities; they’ll HELP them.
Like big, ole PALS.
Now, they’re won’t be dynamic entries and body-slams, good Lord, no...!
Not at first, anyway. Not for a really long time —probably.
“Bureau of Anesthetic, Tongs, and Fallopian tubes”; Safeguarding Womens’ Reproductive Rights.
This would all be before quizzes for abortion cards, abortion waiting periods, and raids on Junk Abortion Providers.
And who in the world has just one little handgun (of course, I lost all my weapons in that unfortunate boating accident).
Interesting video
Just in case you wanted to become a tanker....
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6ff_1359467686
Being poor, I have only one inexpensive 9mm handgun and 58 rounds. Used to have a nice Winchester shotgun and Marlin .22 rifle with plenty of ammo but the first wife compelled me to sell them at a loss with kids in the house.
I am a peaceable citizen.
democrats unwittingly turning up the heat under the simmering pots they are already standing in saying, “Come on in. The water’s fine.”
Good, sez I. Lett’em.
Come and get them.
“SCHAKOWSKY: ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN ‘JUST THE BEGINNING’”
Yeah sweetheart, the beginning of the end for you and your liberal goonfriends.
Making guns illegal for criminals doesn’t stop criminals. What makes you think law-abiding patriots in the country won’t go underground and do the same? You know, like carrying boxes of SAM’s and other goodies over the same fast-n-furious border you and your colleagues are so desperate to keep wide open?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.