Who the hell is SE CUP?
Went to wiki and learned she is an atheist MSNBC host.
Why the hell do we care and why was she at CPAC to begin with?
Anyone want to support this group at CPAC as well? Or are you a beastiphobe? 
That’s what happens when you spend too much time at MSNBC..the idiocy begins to wipe off on you
SE is happy?
Good. Who needs this little fake conservative, atheist prima donna polluting CPAC? She’s at MSNBC...right where she belongs.
Good riddance...you are either with G-d, or against Him. She has made her choice.
Well ... bye.
I think the line recently used by the WY Legislator to the Yankee transplant grousing about his pro-gun legislation for teachers to be able to carry @ school is appropriate: “By all means, leave!”
Once you figure out you don’t fit a particular group, stop the pretense since everybody knows it anyway. Of course, in this case, it may eventually cost her since she loses a pipeline to the inside info on the conservative movement. Her various employers may figure out she’s just an attractive face with a moderate to slightly conservative view that doesn’t really bring value or an audience.
Chris Hayes....Was that litle flit attending........if so why?
A.K.A. "The Four"?
I like her, but that show really sounds hideous.
Good riddance
Who the Hell is this woman?
She comes out of nowhere and is held up as a leader of the Conservative movement?
Sorry Ms Cupp, but societies fail without moral fabric. This is the underlying flaw in the libertarian philosophy/ideology/religion.
You are very smart but throw it away for Crap like this!
Don't you tell me it's the "Libertarian Thing to do"
I am a Libertarian and Libertarians are about liberty for all, except with Gay Marriage you have (beyond the fact that HaShem forbids it) an infringement on the rights of the Religious institutions.
When you force the Government to force Priests/Rabbi/s etc to preform an act against their will, that is not liberty.
If two gay people truly "loved" each other than they don't need to force it down everyone else through. We had gay people in like the 1950's and they didn't need the governments approval then.
This is just another social experiment in the moral degradation of America.
Now waiting for Sarah Elizabeth to announce what woman she wishes to marry . . .
CPAC is a conservative movement that needs a spring cleaning. Glad (forgive the pun) to see her leave. Never quite understood the enchantment with “S. E. Cupp”.
Pro-lifers take a lot of heat for being ‘one issue’ voters...looks like supporters of sodomite ‘marriage’ feel the same way. Ironic.
Never thought I'd say it, but this is my last input to FR; enjoy your own little world folks.
Who the hell is SE CUP?
Went to wiki and learned she is an atheist MSNBC host.
Why the hell do we care and why was she at CPAC to begin with?
Anyone want to support this group at CPAC as well? Or are you a beastiphobe?
SE is committing career suicide these past two weeks. She’s going to lose her entire fanbase. 3 years from now, she’ll either be out of the media all together, or pull a Charlie Crist and flip parties. Too bad. Although, I found her to a great asset to our movement a couple years ago.
I would suggest to many in this thread that Ms. Cupp has a valid point though I suspect that her reasoning is a bit faulty.
Conservatives need to realize that these issues are coming up because the left is baiting us into a fight on their terms and we need to stop allowing that to happen. They know that as long as this fight continues at the federal level they have a chance of winning and if they do manage a win we’ll all be screwed. Conservatives need to put a stop to this and get the fight back where we can have the most impact - at the local level.
We need to adopt a policy of replying to these matters by stating unequivocally that things such as this are not federal issues; that we can not have a limited government if we also grant that government restrictive powers over the individual; that the power of the state, no matter how well intentioned, must be used with great restraint when it comes to individuals.
Why risk having this battle on one front when we can just as easily fight it at the ground level on 10,000 different fronts? At least that way if we lose 10 or 20 smaller battles we will not have lost the whole war.
Well we don’t need a rino at CPAC as Cupp is one. But the question is now on the table... How does she get fired from the Blaze TV as it tries to get on more cable outlets?