Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The War on Drugs is Immoral and Ineffective
Times Square Gossip ^ | February 13, 2013 | Brian Woodward

Posted on 02/13/2013 2:23:16 PM PST by honestabe010

Despite increased efforts, manpower, and resources, the war on drugs has been a resounding failure. W.C. fields once quipped, “If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There’s no point in being a damn fool about it.” Not only does the government continue to fail in its crusade against drugs, it continues to perpetrate a policy of immense immorality. It has been over forty years since President Richard Nixon declared war on drugs. What do we have to show for it? The United States has wasted over one trillion dollars, caused incarceration rates to exceed that of the Gulag Archipelago under Stalin, discriminated heavily against African-Americans, propped up the drug cartels, and allowed drug profits to flow into the pockets of al-Qaeda and other such terrorist groups.

The biggest success in the war on drugs has been the protection of drug cartel’s profits. In a standard legalized business, there are countless importers and exporters of a particular good. However, due to drug raids and seizures, the price of maintaining an operation has been driven up, forcing out small time distributors. This allows the only viable distributors to be those with enough money and resources to avoid interdiction efforts. These are the highly violent drug cartels that are flush with cash. By keeping goods out and arresting local distributors, the government keeps the price of these drugs up. What else could a monopolist want?

From 1776 to 1914, drugs were mostly legal on a federal and local level. What was so wrong with that period of time? Alcohol prohibition clearly failed, creating a black market for alcohol, resulting in organized crime fueled by the likes of Al Capone. Drug prohibition in the United States has created the monsters known as drug cartels...

(Excerpt) Read more at timessquaregossip.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; drugs; drugwar; moralabsolutes; obama; warondrugs; wod; wodlist; wosd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2013 2:23:20 PM PST by honestabe010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: honestabe010

The War on Morality is immoral but very effective

there is nothing good to say about drugs


2 posted on 02/13/2013 2:26:02 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honestabe010

You can say the same thing about the war on poverty.


3 posted on 02/13/2013 2:26:49 PM PST by dartuser (My firearm is not illegal ... its undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honestabe010

I concur.


4 posted on 02/13/2013 2:27:52 PM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honestabe010

Excellent, thanks for posting this.


5 posted on 02/13/2013 2:27:59 PM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
there is nothing good to say about drugs

Nor about the War on Drugs.

6 posted on 02/13/2013 2:30:31 PM PST by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: honestabe010

Drugs are bad. The war on some drugs are worse.


7 posted on 02/13/2013 2:38:09 PM PST by Darren McCarty (If most people were more than keyboard warriors, we might have won the election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honestabe010

The “war” against ending any criminal activity is ineffective, and often immoral. Does that mean we shouldn’t arrest and prosecute gang members, rapists, pedophiles, thieves, white-collar criminals, or murderers? This is a stupid argument.


8 posted on 02/13/2013 2:40:58 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
The “war” against ending any criminal activity is ineffective,

Two-thirds of murders are solved - a success rate surely several orders of magnitude higher than the rate at which drug "crimes" are even detected.

and often immoral.

How so?

Does that mean we shouldn’t arrest and prosecute gang members, rapists, pedophiles, thieves, white-collar criminals, or murderers?

Unlike drug "crimes," those crimes have actual victims.

9 posted on 02/13/2013 2:48:44 PM PST by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: honestabe010

Same ol hippy clap trap.

Times Square Gossip — sounds about right.


10 posted on 02/13/2013 2:51:46 PM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
there is nothing good to say about drugs

Do you have something good to say about freedom? The War on Drugs is the #1 reason why our 4th Amendment rights have basically evaporated. And for what?

Oh, and while we're on the topic, how did our 2nd Amendment rights save us from this? This is another thing that's annoying me recently: the idea that the 2nd Amendment is some kind of magic that preserves our other rights. If you're resorting to that, you've already screwed up. The people who let the War on Drugs erode our basic rights screwed up.

11 posted on 02/13/2013 2:52:00 PM PST by Mr. Know It All
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Right


12 posted on 02/13/2013 2:53:45 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
Not really. Here in Washington state some of the strongest supporters of legalizing marijuana were former officers of the law.

From wikipedia...."Registered sponsors for the measure include: John McKay, former U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Washington; Pete Holmes, Seattle city attorney; Kim Marie Thorburn MD and MPH, former director of the Spokane Regional Health District; and travel writer Rick Steves.[1] Other sponsors include state representative for the 36th district Mary Lou Dickerson, immediate past president of the Washington State Bar Association Salvador A. Mungia, past president of the Washington State Bar Association Mark Johnson, former King County health official Robert W. Wood MD, University of Washington School of Social Work professor emeritus Roger Roffman DSW, and Alison Holcomb, campaign director for New Approach Washington, "on loan from" the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington.'

..."The mayor and entire city council of Seattle support I-502,[27] as does the King County sheriff.[28] Former narcotics deputy and candidate for King County sheriff John Urquhart, saying "the war on drugs has been an abject failure"."

13 posted on 02/13/2013 2:57:29 PM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: honestabe010
For the most part, the only folks really concerned about drugs are users, dealers, cops, congresscritters and people who have never had the experience.

Don't be one of those folks and the problem is solved.

14 posted on 02/13/2013 3:17:18 PM PST by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All

Libertarian Utopians are stupid.

They want all drugs legal for all people, right? Kids too, since to liberdopians they are just little adults. No age of consent is a retarded idea.


15 posted on 02/13/2013 3:17:50 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: honestabe010

Duh.


16 posted on 02/13/2013 3:32:49 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

There are reasonable arguments for somehow changing the approach to drugs made by reasonable people.

This article is not one of them and is more hippy clap trap.

eg

“From 1776 to 1914, drugs were mostly legal on a federal and local level. What was so wrong with that period of time? Alcohol prohibition clearly failed”

Drugs were mainly not invented or discovered nor known or available during most of this time period.

By the turn of the century knowledge of them and their availability had become such that laws in 1906 and 1914 were put in place in reaction.

And prohibition didn’t occur until 1919. The author doesn’t know how to even think straight to make an argument.


17 posted on 02/13/2013 3:33:59 PM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

“there is nothing good to say about drugs”

They’re palliative. They’re socially useful. They provide good entertainment.

There, that’s three things.


18 posted on 02/13/2013 3:35:19 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Two words, ‘opium dens’.


19 posted on 02/13/2013 3:37:36 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
They want all drugs legal for all people, right?

No. They want marijuana legalized for the same people who are legal to drink alcohol. Other drugs can be dealt with in ways that are specific to the harm they cause.

20 posted on 02/13/2013 3:41:11 PM PST by Mr. Know It All
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson