Skip to comments.
Thomas Sowell: 'AT WHAT PRICE?' - The Difference Between Liberals and Conservatives
www.youtube.com ^
| Mar 17, 2010
| Thomas Sowell
Posted on 02/04/2013 6:31:04 AM PST by Yosemitest
Watch this 4 Minutes 32 Seconds of Video. The Difference Between Liberal and Conservative
Fred Barnes: Yeah, you were in your early years, you were a a Marxist.
Thomas Sowell: Yes.
Fred Barnes: Uh
What happened?
How'd you
uh
get away from that?
Thomas Sowell: Ah
I took a job in the government.
I was still a Marxists.
But uh, one summer of working in the government was enough to uh in turn
start, start, in turn, start turning me around.
I went through the University of Chicago as a Marxist. After a year of uh
studying under Milton FriedmanFred Barnes: Really? What happened to you there?
Thomas Sowell: Nothing hastened to me, but that I realized that the government was no where close to being capable of doing what people of the left wanted the government to do.
And in fact, we'd be lucky if they didn't make things worse.
For example, I was in the Labor Department, and uh they administered the Minimum Wage Law.
Ah to me the question was "did Minimum Wage Laws make poor people better off or worse off?"
Fred Barnes: And you
Thomas Sowell: That was not the question for them.
The Minimum Wage Law provided one third of their tot
total budget.
And they weren't going to look at this in, in this other way, and as I tried to get into this in the question of "Does this cause unemployment?" and stuff like that,
there was no enthusiasm whatsoever for that whole line of reasoning.
Fred Barnes:Ah, You've written a trilogy of books about, about people you call "The Anointed" ...
Thomas Sowell: Yes.
Fred Barnes:
Of which are people who are
basically liberals
Thomas Sowell: Um huh.
Fred Barnes:
in American society.
What are you, what are you
Are you
What do you mean by calling them "Anointed" or "Self-Anointed"?
Thomas Sowell: That's right?
Uh, there, there are people who seriously believe that they are 'wiser and noblier' than others, that the way to improve society is to have the government force people to follow what "The Anointed" want, rather than to let the people do what they themselves want to do.
And uh, there are all kinds of theoascoes that follow in the wake of this kind, this kind of notion.
Fred Barnes: Conservatives are
are routinely blamed for not caring about people and yet, you say just the opposite is true, that it's liberals who care about "their vision" of how the world should be,
Thomas Sowell: Yes.
Fred Barnes:
but not about real life human beings.
Thomas Sowell: Absolutely. I think the bussing thing was a classic example.
You'd be hard pressed to show how black people, white people, or any other people ,,,
Fred Barnes: Uh huh
Thomas Sowell: were benefitted by this.
But the liberals love it.
It enabled them to 'morally superior' to those who are fighting against bussing.
And, and the evidence, one way or the other, really did not interest them.
Fred Barnes: Aren't uh conservative free market ideals sometimes hard to sell?
I think of the uh the labor unions are sometimes attacking Walmart.
Thomas Sowell: Um hum.
Fred Barnes:
And saying Walmart pays its employees too little.
Uh, I mean that's a nice thing to be for.
I mean you want more money for people who work at Walmart.
What's wrong with that?
Thomas Sowell: Hey, I want more money for myself. I uh, I (ha ha)
But that doesn't mean that someone else has the obligation to pay it.
Uh, if you're paying people for their work, instead of just paying them for what they think that they need,
ah, then clearly these people wouldn't be working for Walmart, if someone else thought their worth was worth more than Walmart is paying.
Fred Barnes: So uh, why, why do think liberals have jumped on Walmart? Uh, because of its success?
Thomas Sowell: Because of its success. That's a, that a sufficient reason.
Uh, they
are really are for helping
they're for helping 'people who are disadvantaged' as they put it.
Fred Barnes: Uh huh
Thomas Sowell:
Uh, whereas I think conservatives, conservatives want to stop people from being disadvantaged.
You know, the university, the liberals want to help the poor while they're poor.
But really, the biggest benefit is to stop them from being poor.
And that, they have very title in terse in.
Fred Barnes: What is the liberal premise?
Thomas Sowell: I
Uh, I guess, uh, the Rousseau notion, you know,"that man is born free, but is everywhere in chains"
that the real problem with the world is that the institutions are wrong.
If the institutions were right, then man
there were nothing in human nature that would cause us to be unhappy.
It's the fact that we have the wrong institutions.
Fred Barnes: What is the conservative premise?
Thomas Sowell: That the man is flawed from uh, from day one.
And that uh
you,
there are no solutions, there are only trade-offs.
And that whatever you do to deal with one of man's flaws, it creates another problem.
But that you try to get the best trade-off that you can get.
And that's all you can hope for.
Uh, I've often said that
there are three questions that I think would destroy most of the arguments on the left, and the first is that uh, The second isAnd the third is"What hard evidence do you have?"
Ah, there are very few ideas on the left that can pass all three of those kinds of things.
Fred Barnes: Can conservative ideas pass those?
Thomas Sowell: Yes, I think so, because they, they don't ASSUME that there, that there is a solution out there.
You know, Adam Smith didn't believe that the, uh that either the government or the market could solve all the problems .
That you have to be able to simply tolerate certain things.
Ah, And the idea to the left of tolerating any evil, you know, they want to stamp out the last vestige of segregation.
Really? AT WHAT PRICE?
AT WHAT PRICE?
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: conservative; guns; liberal; sowell; thomassowell; wages
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Good one!
But, as you are probably aware, the enemedia does worse than failure to check out sources. They employ what I call the "reverse scientific method":
- Draw your conclusions.
- Find evidence to support said conclusions.
- If you can't find it, then manufacture it.
- Discard and discredit any evidence which doesn't support step #1.
21
posted on
02/04/2013 11:55:58 AM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Yosemitest; Liz; neverdem; sickoflibs; Travis McGee; marktwain; LucyT
there are three questions that I think would destroy most of the arguments on the left, and the first is... "Compared to what?"
The second is:
"At what cost?"
And the third is:
"What hard evidence do you have?"
... very few ideas on the left that can pass all three ...
Great stuff - thanks for posting.
22
posted on
02/04/2013 1:09:30 PM PST
by
GOPJ
( Revelation can be more perilous than Revolution. Vladimir Nabokov)
To: jazusamo
Thank you for the ping to the wisdom of one of our national treasures.
Dr. Sowell ROCKS!
To: TheOldLady
As always my pleasure, FRiend.
24
posted on
02/04/2013 5:16:08 PM PST
by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: GOPJ
25
posted on
02/04/2013 9:57:52 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson