Later Thursday, a spokesman for the NRA said that while the group was working with members of Congress to "address the problems with the background check system," the group would not support expanding background checks to include private transfers.
Manchin talks out every side of his mouth.
1 posted on
01/26/2013 4:16:12 PM PST by
Red Steel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Red Steel
How about a background check for our “leaders” form the pResident down?
2 posted on
01/26/2013 4:19:24 PM PST by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: Red Steel
After he got told off by his constituents earlier in the week, he’s now trying to have is cake and eat it too.
3 posted on
01/26/2013 4:20:11 PM PST by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: Red Steel
Manchin is a phoney and I hope the voters of West Virginia remember this when he comes up for election again.
4 posted on
01/26/2013 4:20:43 PM PST by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
To: Red Steel
The NRA should be working on eliminating background checks altogether.
5 posted on
01/26/2013 4:22:30 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Red Steel
The NRA better not be doing that.
6 posted on
01/26/2013 4:22:46 PM PST by
bmwcyle
(People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
To: Red Steel
No more gun laws, period.
7 posted on
01/26/2013 4:23:51 PM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Red Steel
must be the harry reid wing of the NRA. what rinos? what are their names?
10 posted on
01/26/2013 4:28:46 PM PST by
dadfly
To: Red Steel
We have enough background checks now. Criminals don’t buy weapons at gun stores or gunshows. They buy them out of the trunk of a car. Mostly stolen. Universal background checks are just for law abiding citizens.
13 posted on
01/26/2013 4:29:44 PM PST by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Red Steel
Wouldn’t have done a thing to stop the Sand Creek massacre, but you must never allow a crisis to go to waste.
17 posted on
01/26/2013 4:41:25 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
To: Red Steel
How long before they tell us “With universal background checks, Adam Lanza would not have been able to steal his mother’s weapons after murdering her”?
18 posted on
01/26/2013 4:41:53 PM PST by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Red Steel
You can always count on representatives of the Democratic [sic] party to strive relentlessly against our civil rights.
To: Red Steel
Hey Joe! How about you do one of those “background checks” on the person squatting in the White House?
20 posted on
01/26/2013 4:44:22 PM PST by
Captain7seas
(Fire Jane Lubchenco)
To: Red Steel
Exemption for sporting events? Does this mean we would need to call in for a background check when the bad guys are crawling through the kitchen window?
21 posted on
01/26/2013 4:46:08 PM PST by
NautiNurse
(BOHICA)
To: Red Steel
Anyone running for president should be able to pass a background check.
To: Red Steel
I know this is not popular here and I know the comments I will receive so don't bother...:)..(as if that will make a difference)
After the shooting in Shady Brook the game has changed. Most folks love their kids and grand kids more that their guns...
The vast majority of Americans don't want the crazies to have guns but they wont give up their constitutional right to own theirs.
IMHO the NRA or any other group advocating for the 2nd Amendment can not be seen as advocating letting the crazies have guns. One way to reduce the number of crazies from acquiring guns may be through the background check procedure...
To: Red Steel
Manchin talks out every side of his mouth.
............................................................
That’s his mouth that noise is coming from?? I would have bet it was coming from the other end.
26 posted on
01/26/2013 4:59:17 PM PST by
Venturer
To: Red Steel
One more worthless law at a time is how they are playing it.
Then they claim they just need one more.
NO MORE. Put the crazy people in hospitals and leave the guns alone.
29 posted on
01/26/2013 5:03:08 PM PST by
hadaclueonce
(you are paying 12% more for fuel because of Ethanol. Smile big Corn Lobby,)
To: Red Steel
Wow. This guy is a real P.O.S.
30 posted on
01/26/2013 5:04:35 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(LAZ'S LAW: As an argument with liberals goes on, the probability of being called racist approaches 1)
To: Red Steel
Why does Manchin remind me of that brother-in-law who borrows money and can’t keep a job?
31 posted on
01/26/2013 5:04:35 PM PST by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: Red Steel
the group would not support expanding background checks to include private transfers. Wow, somebody must have figured out that Joe Bob is NOT going to go get a background check done every time he trades a gun to one of his buddies. (Not that the law would have been enforcable anyway, all Joe Bob would need to do is backdate a receipt before the law was changed in case any questions were ever asked.)
34 posted on
01/26/2013 5:14:21 PM PST by
apillar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson