Skip to comments.
Cities Declare War on Food Trucks
The American Interest ^
| January 22, 2013
| Walter Russell Mead
Posted on 01/23/2013 1:49:23 PM PST by PJ-Comix
Food trucks have become the hottest new industry, yet many cities are doing everything they can to stop them in their tracks. In city after city, lawmakers are imposing complicated regulations on food trucks and other street vendors, often in the name of consumer safety, which make it nearly impossible for vendors to actually operate their trucks. Chicagos regulations are particularly onerous, as Reason reports:
According to the Chicago Tribune, 109 would-be purveyors of mobile cuisine have applied for licenses, but the city hasnt seen fit to OK any of them. Among the requirements they may be having difficulty meeting:
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.the-american-interest.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: foodtrucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Cities regulating food vendors out of existence. I used to look forward to Fridays and Saturdays when a food vendor used to serve up jerk pork and chicken. No longer. The city licensed him out of existence.
1
posted on
01/23/2013 1:49:30 PM PST
by
PJ-Comix
To: dennisw
No more Carlton. The city got on his case and has prevented him from selling jerk pork and chicken. I sure miss those.
2
posted on
01/23/2013 1:51:08 PM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Beware the Rip in the Space/Time Continuum)
To: PJ-Comix
Probably joining a union would get them permits the next day...
3
posted on
01/23/2013 1:52:54 PM PST
by
ltc8k6
To: PJ-Comix
Yep, we gotta regulate them out of business. After all the entrepreneurs starting these businesses are usually working themselves out of the gutter and out of government dependency. Above all, don’t let capitalism work.
4
posted on
01/23/2013 1:54:13 PM PST
by
JimSEA
( “what difference does it make?”)
To: PJ-Comix
Brick and mortar restaurants who have the additional overhead of paying off building and health inspectors started squawking too much.
To: PJ-Comix
How else can the big-government/big-corporate criminal monopoly maintain their monopoly?
6
posted on
01/23/2013 1:56:26 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
To: PJ-Comix
Out here in the country, I noticed a few Spanish speaking tomato pickers who decided selling tacos from an old bread truck beat picking tomatoes. The county leaves them alone and the food is great, though it’s hard sometimes to tell if the meat used to go moo, baa, or WOOF.
7
posted on
01/23/2013 1:56:26 PM PST
by
coolbreeze
(giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teen-age boys.)
To: PJ-Comix
Maybe if they paid protection money, like the other businesses in Chicago?
8
posted on
01/23/2013 1:57:32 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: PJ-Comix
Here in Socal, I know it differs in each city. The lazy bums from Vernon as an example, have the license for cheap as 80% of the city is warehouse-related and almost no buses nor restaurants are around.
9
posted on
01/23/2013 2:01:33 PM PST
by
max americana
(Make the world a better place by punching a liberal in the face)
To: PJ-Comix
Best sandwiches I have eaten I have gotten off those trucks.
10
posted on
01/23/2013 2:02:21 PM PST
by
svcw
(Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
To: PJ-Comix
Yes they definitely have to get rid of food trucks because this is the Obama era and food trucks create jobs and we don't want that. We gotta get that unemployment percentage up to the teens, come on come on WE CAN DO IT!
11
posted on
01/23/2013 2:02:21 PM PST
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Someday our schools we will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
To: JimSEA
Up until maybe 20 years ago Chicago had an idiot ordinance against outdoor patios and terraces for restaurants. Finally got rid of it when the restaurants begged them pointing out how popular they were in other cities and costing them conventions and $$$$$$$$$$$
12
posted on
01/23/2013 2:03:31 PM PST
by
Kozak
(The Republic is dead. I do not owe what we have any loyalty, wealth or sympathy.)
To: PJ-Comix
109 would-be purveyors of mobile cuisine have applied for licenses, but the city hasnt seen fit to OK any of them. This is Chicago these guys did not grease the machine sufficiently.
To: PJ-Comix
14
posted on
01/23/2013 2:13:56 PM PST
by
RC one
(.From My Cold Dead Hands.)
To: coolbreeze
...or MEOW............here, Kitty, Kitty, Kitty!.......
15
posted on
01/23/2013 2:15:02 PM PST
by
Red Badger
(Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
To: Mike Darancette
You know, I’d sit and come up with a way around this for the ChiTrucks, but I think I’d rather watch the suffering.
16
posted on
01/23/2013 2:18:15 PM PST
by
txhurl
To: PJ-Comix
17
posted on
01/23/2013 2:23:07 PM PST
by
Washi
(Socialism is Slavery)
To: PJ-Comix
Are we talking about trucks that cook food in the truck or the Roach Coach’s that go around Construction jobs.
18
posted on
01/23/2013 2:28:37 PM PST
by
Venturer
To: svcw
I’ve never had bad food from a catering truck. Not saying it isn’t out there, but that’s been my experience.
19
posted on
01/23/2013 2:30:43 PM PST
by
ZirconEncrustedTweezers
("I'm not anti-anything, I just wanna be free." - Mike Muir)
To: PJ-Comix
Cities regulating food vendors out of existence. I used to look forward to Fridays and Saturdays when a food vendor used to serve up jerk pork and chicken. No longer. The city licensed him out of existence.
The health inspectors for the area probably didn't like chasing them around to get their pay off money.
Lived in Miami for a while and had friends that owned restaurants . The health inspectors stopped by each and every single week holding their hands out . They could not stay open even though their places were spotless unless they paid them off too as they would just write something up and say close right now .
20
posted on
01/23/2013 2:31:50 PM PST
by
Lera
(Proverbs 29:2)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson