Replies

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Homosexuals are what they are, and they have to come to terms with that in their own privacy, between themselves and their creator. Gay marriage is another step in the collapse of traditional society, and that is a bad thing for EVERYONE, whether gay or straight. Traditional society is not a grand conspiracy. It’s a delicate machine, forged through years of human moral perseverance. If we accept that the nuclear family is not something we want anymore, we do a disservice to our children (no surprise, we’ve been doing that since the 1960s). We offer them a bleak and uncertain future that they don’t deserve.

From what I can see, these French homosexuals who have spoken up recognize that they are not natural, and will never be, by the very definition of the word ‘natural’. They accept that, and value what traditional society provides. I commend them for not falling victim to the homosexual agenda, and defending traditional France. From the looks of things, with the outcry over gay marriage, as well as Generation Identitaire’s protest against the destruction of their culture, France’s conservative movement may be waking up from a long period of slumber. About time too.

Homosexuals are what they are, and they have to come to terms with that in their own privacy, between themselves and their creator.

It's very simple. Sodomites must repent of their sin, be redeemed through the blood of Christ and then lose all traces of the wickedness that is homosexuality. The myth of the so-called "gay gene" gives a pass to this evil. It's a deliberate choice by the individual to rebel against Almighty God by becoming a sodomite. The only way to come to terms with this vile sin is a through a thorough transformation through Christ. And please, I ask courteously to capitalize Creator, as did the Founding Fathers, since there is but one and only one God (and it sure ain't Allah, Buddah or any of the others). Thanks.

And being a traditionalist, I'll continue my one man campaign to eschew the use of the term "gay" in the context of homosexuality. Part of their agenda is to control the language by co-opting a perfectly fine word meaning joyous and apply it to their twisted deviancy. My wife (may God rest her soul) and I truly had a gay marriage of over 40 years until her death. Happiness was in abundance and no sodomite is going to corrupt the rightful meaning of that word as long as I'm still alive!

So some semantic differences aside, the intent of your post is laudable.

From what I can see, these French homosexuals who have spoken up recognize that they are not natural, and will never be, by the very definition of the word ‘natural’.

I believe the gentleman's use of the word "natural" referred to gay marriage, not to homosexuality per se. All of nature contains outlying elements and manifestations. A certain number of homosexuals occur in nature. He meant that it is gay parenting that is not "natural", since it requires a third or fourth party into the relationship, and forces children to grow up without one or both natural parents and role models.

Since creating a stable union as parents is the major purpose of marriage and societal organization, there is no purpose served for gays to become, at best, half parents; in fact, it creates harm for children in such faux arrangements.

Nor are same-sex relationships "normal", a norm being something the great majority of entities engage in.