Posted on 01/17/2013 11:20:52 AM PST by ColdOne
The U.S. hasn't confirmed an Al Qaeda-affliliated group's claim that it perpetrated the attack. "We certainly heard reports of people taking responsibility, making claims of responsibility for this terrorist attacks but we have not been able to thus far confirm those claims," Carney said.
SNIP
Carney said. "I wouldn't want to say anything that turned out not to be true."
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Oh no....did they see the “video” too?
Just some other “less than optimal” “bumps in the road”.
I wouldn’t want to be an American overseas these days.
Ya’ see! Right there.
...everything is a crisis with Odungo..... the slow response is on purpose....PLUS he can’t control what is someone else’s operation (France). I’m thinking it’s a good thing he’s out of the picture, because everything this clown gets involved with turns to s***.
This must mean that all the Americans have been killed and they’re trying to find a way not to blame Al Qaeda.
I see that Obama’s Benghazi Task Force - ‘stand down and let ‘em die’, crew is on the job.
Don’t worry, Carney , America is used to your lies. There is no penalty for Obama’s lies, so stay on course.
WH waiting for the MSM to start the cover-up.
Looks about the same .. I cant read the chicken scratch...
This is too bizarre for words. The French, who certainly know more about Algeria than we do, know who is behind this, even though it embarrasses them to admit that they slacked off on Algeria after the civil war (actually, Islamic jihad) of about 10 years ago seemed to come to an end. The reason it seemed to come to an end was, as Bush himself said, that the jihadis were drawn off to fight the US in Iraq and Afghanistan. But AQ was obviously building up its “adminstrative headquarters” there, even though it was attacking elsewhere.
And they’re back in full form now. I read some articles in the foreign press that said that the reason AQ had been able to overwhelm this large facility so easily was that the companies and the government had cut back on security after things seemed to calm down.
I still don’t see why Obama is protecting AQIM (Al Qaeda in the Islamic Mahgreb, i.e., North Africa), which has launched attacks all over the place. I did notice, however, that AQ thought its safe haven would be Libya, so maybe Obama actually is not acting as randomly as one might think. He really does seem to be on their side.
This place is 100 miles or so from the Libya border and you can be sure that’s the home base of the terrorists.
Here’s the location on Google Maps:
thank you. It looks the same to me.
“The White House is protecting and arming al Qaeda while
attacking the US Constitution and Americans.”
How can the vast number of citizens not see this? This is TREASON!
“He really does seem to be on their side.”
He IS on their side. Where is that damning picture of him stating that he will take the side of islam?
Why were not our crack Special Force "ready rescue" teams involved, why do we chose to depend on our "host countries" for "security" ala Benghazi "rescue of four (4) dead Americans", two (2) of which defied orders not to get involved in saving Ambassador Chris Stevens and his aide????
No answers, more subterfuge.
-PJ
Sure, as if he'd know anything. I'm thinking it was Tibetan monks.
Sure, as if he'd know anything. I'm thinking it was Tibetan monks.
“He really does seem to be on their side.”
He certainly does seen to be..... and there doesn’t seem like there is a damn thing we can do about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.