[RoosterRedux]

Shapiro nails Morgan to the wall!

[SkyDancer]

Hey Pierce!!!

[struggle]

This is why Piers is doing a “health show” tonight. His ass is sore from being kicked repeatedly.

[DallasSun]

That was your take? Shapiro looked like a complete idiot and a crazy person. He did our cause no good at all. Hopefully we will not be judged by this loon. Most gun owners are responsible sane people.

[353FMG]

They keep on talking back and forth about assault weapons, neither of them realizing that the large majority of the AR-15s in civilian hands are of the semi-automatic type and are therefore not assault weapons.

I can forgive Morgan because he is a lefty, but Shapiro should know better.

[riri]

Hm, it’s gonna be tricky offing Shapiro.Even the blindest of the sheeple might start asking questions.

[ArGee]

Shapiro nails Morgan to the wall!

So will we be limiting nails now?

[proudpapa]

Did Piers really bring up a letter “penned” by Ronald Reagan in 1994?

RR was dealing with Alzheimers in 1994. Fail.

[SeekAndFind]

SOME OBSERVATIONS REGARDING BEN SHAPIRO, PIERS MORGAN AND MORGAN’s PREVIOUS GUEST — ALEX JONES....

Shapiro states correctly that the Second Amendment is written specifically for the American people to be well armed. They are to form a militia in times of crisis and will be used to protect the people of these united States. Folks this is about your property rights. It is also to have the effect of a counterweight; a deterrent to a government that becomes tyrannical.

It is not to be infringed.

Piers Morgan weaves a familiar script where he insisted on Shapiro to answer his question. If you noticed, the trap is set when Morgan doesn’t allow the guest to answer. He will intentionally interrupt the guest with another question or allegation. He will continue stacking the questions and allegations.

Indeed, Piers Morgan’s strategy is to paint a tapestry of the guest being “insensitive and absurd”.

In legal circles, such tactics would be a form of “leading the witness”, which would not be allowed in a court of law. Granted, the Piers Morgan show is not a court of law. Nevertheless, in any public debate there are rules of engagement. Each side is allowed to respond without constant interruption. Piers Morgan has an annoying habit of not letting his guest finish his point.

Alex Jones was adept in recognizing that the Piers Morgan Show is not a stage for a “fair” debate. Jones did not allow Piers Morgan to weave a web of questions and allegations. Each time Alex Jones fired back with a library of published statistics and facts.

In this regard, Alex Jones took Piers Morgan to the wood shed.

Unfortunately, Jones came off as a ranting, raving loon and his insistence that the US government had something to do with the destruction of the NY twin towers did him no favors.

It is also important noting that Piers Morgan and other anti-gun pundits ask repeatedly:

“Why does anyone need a military assault rifle like that of a AR-15?”

How many times was this question answered by the guests in those interviews?

Ben Shapiro answered it TWICE. It is to have the effect of a counterweight; a deterrent to a government that becomes tyrannical. Our government might not be tyrannical like Stalin or the Nazis now, but there is no guarantee that it won’t slowly evolve that way. THAT is why we need a means of protecting ourselves and DETERRING Tyranny.

Piers Morgan was given this answer and never responded to it.

[grumpygresh]

The Bill of Rights is not the bill of needs. Who is this arrogant Piers Morgan to determine what our wants and needs should be? By this reasoning, why should we have any property rights at all. Does a person need to own a house? No, one can rent. Does a person need to own food or water? No, it can be rationed and provided by the government for example.
Does anyone need to own a gun or more specifically a semi-auto rifle? Well, sometimes yes and sometimes not, maybe never, but that should not matter if you live in a free country. Sadly, our country is no longer as free because our masters must determine our needs now.

[WorkingClassFilth]

Something Shapiro should have remembered iin relation to the British Morgan subverting American freedoms: 1) “assault rifles” secured America from the tyrannical British rule. 2) American “assault rifle” owners willingly gave them up to defend Britain against Hitler in 1940 as the NRA had a drive for Americans to donate arms to be sent to GB for their homeland defense. Yes, the white cliffs of Dover had home defense soldiers patrolling with American firearms because the British robbed their former WWI soldiers of their rights and arms. 3) Finally, what does the British experience with the IRA (an island nation supposedly immune to border infringement) teach the sentient about national measures to deter illegal gun possession and use?

On all three counts, Morgan would have had three more boot shaped bruises on his fat limey arse.

[spodefly]

I think Shapiro may have been way off the mark in his estimate that it could take 50 to 100 years for the US government to go tyrannical.

Other than that, he did fine.

[tomkat]

Shapiro needs to switch to decaf a couple hours before events like that.

Would've enjoyed seeing that Brit poof trot out his statist bullshite to Allen West .. esp. the 'your little book' schtick.

[jmaroneps37]

“What was your take? Shapiro looked like a complete idiot and a crazy person. He did our cause no good at all. Hopefully we will not be judged by this loon. Most gun owners are responsible sane people.”
So you would prefer a RINO from Congress telling Morgan he is right and looking soooooooooo reasonable?
Line from “White men can't jump” :The difference between you and me is you'd rather look good and miss the shot and I'd rather make the shot.”
Shapiro can play on my team any time. He refused to be bullied and had Morgan on the ropes praying for the bell by the time he was finished with him.