Skip to comments.
Thunderbird 2 flies again: The astonishing airship set to revolutionise haulage, tourism...
Daily Mail ^
| 1/4/13
| Damien Gayle
Posted on 01/04/2013 12:38:01 PM PST by Nachum
A radical new kind of airship funded by the US military is about to make its first test flight - and it looks uncannily like the Thunderbird 2 craft from the classic TV show.
The Aeroscraft airship will carry three times as much as the biggest military cargo planes over thousands of miles, use a third of the fuel, and it doesn't even need a landing strip.
It could also have major implications for cargo haulage, and almost everything now laboriously transported across the planet's surface by boat, train and lorry could within years be carried through the skies, its makers claim.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airship; haulage; tourism; warfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Full title: Thunderbird 2 flies again: The astonishing airship set to revolutionise haulage, tourism... and warfare
It's..um... a blimp
1
posted on
01/04/2013 12:38:10 PM PST
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
2
posted on
01/04/2013 12:43:31 PM PST
by
frithguild
(You can call me Snippy the Anti-Freeper)
To: Nachum
Not a blimp. Blimps have no rigid air frame. This has a rigid air frame and it is therefor a lighter than air ship.
3
posted on
01/04/2013 12:44:21 PM PST
by
Candor7
(Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
To: Nachum
4
posted on
01/04/2013 12:46:47 PM PST
by
mike_9958
To: Nachum
I've seen this from a distance twice - once for a few moments before they rushed to close the doors because there was a very light breeze and it was pushing the blimp across the hanger floor, the second time with it trying to lift off, a slight breeze coming by and it nosing into the ground.
I'm sure this is just the growing pains of a prototype, but this was funded as a long shot program, and so far it's lived up to those expectations. I wish them the best of luck, but if someone’s looking to start placing orders, they might want to hold off. I love the design ideas, seems quite possible to work, just not sure how they'll handle the energy requirements in flight for their fancy ballast system.
5
posted on
01/04/2013 12:47:16 PM PST
by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: frithguild
Fly that over bezerkley and Alien reports will be pouring in.
LLS
6
posted on
01/04/2013 12:47:39 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: Candor7
7
posted on
01/04/2013 12:47:54 PM PST
by
Delta Dawn
(The whole truth.)
To: frithguild
Overgrown as it may be, I thought it was illegal to let such metallized mylar party balloons fly untethered in most urban areas...shorting out power lines etc.
8
posted on
01/04/2013 12:49:53 PM PST
by
repentant_pundit
(Sammy's your uncle, but he behaves like a spoiled rotten kid.)
To: Delta Dawn; Candor7
No reason to be confused. Candor7 is correct.
To: Candor7
10
posted on
01/04/2013 12:50:44 PM PST
by
real saxophonist
(I show my friends my 1911. I show my enemies my Glock.)
To: Candor7
I believe the word is “Dirigible”.
11
posted on
01/04/2013 12:50:44 PM PST
by
BubbaBasher
("Liberty will not long survive the total extinction of morals" - Sam Adams)
To: Nachum
Well, that was uplifting.
12
posted on
01/04/2013 12:54:27 PM PST
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: Nachum
13
posted on
01/04/2013 12:56:23 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(Sine ullo desiderio vive et ama.... Carpe diem.)
To: frithguild
14
posted on
01/04/2013 12:58:30 PM PST
by
TurboZamboni
(Looting the future to bribe the present)
To: Nachum
SUPERTHUNDERSTINGCAR!! ??
To: Dead Corpse
To: Candor7
You mean “dirigible.”
17
posted on
01/04/2013 1:02:55 PM PST
by
Little Ray
(Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
Couple comments.
Would appear to have the capacity to haul a LOT of fuel, so why is range limited to 3000 miles?
For military applications, it looks an awful lot to me like a very large, very slow target.
I would expect the biggest difficulty to be taking off or landing in windy conditions, especially gusting winds.
To: Nachum
Tremendous advantage to not need a landing strip.
They conceive of it delivering to the front line of a battle. Not sure what would protect it from arty or missiles.
20
posted on
01/04/2013 1:07:28 PM PST
by
lurk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson