Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans vote to destroy marriage (vanity)
Myself

Posted on 12/31/2012 7:25:58 AM PST by GreaterSwiss

Per drudge the tax deal would be 400k for Indiv and 450k for family. So why get married? Two single taxpayers would in theory have 800k limit ala Andrew cuomo and his gf. Obama's base is single people.

Also in France they overturned their tax law for this very reason!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: belongsinchat; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: napscoordinator
The income tax is elementally inequitable and unfair ~ could be why you can't figure out why you ought to get a break.

Let's say the fundamental organizing principle among humans is the family.

Designate a family. Add up its profits. Divide by the number of members. Tax each one on that.

Let's say humans have no fundamental organizing principle ~ a theory currently popular with leftists. In that case it does not matter how you allocate income or taxes ~ just collect what you can get and run with it.

Or, let's say society does not need any fundamental principles ~ best bet is to forget about taxes and go find some firearms and ammunition to see you through the coming dark ages.

21 posted on 12/31/2012 9:17:28 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss

It gives homosexuals the chance to be real patriots, get married, and share in the tax system’s marriage penalty

Nice that the second partner’s income in a marriage is only worth $50K for tax favor


22 posted on 12/31/2012 9:48:20 AM PST by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; napscoordinator

I like your tax scheme, though with a flat tax it wouldn’t work. One raising the next generation of society is contributing to the perpetuation of society—those who deliberately avoid contributing ought to contribute some other way, or those who do contribute in this way ought to be exempted or reduced in their contributions in some other way, which amounts to pretty well the same thing.


23 posted on 12/31/2012 9:50:41 AM PST by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

As much as I agree with you, that time is over as the takers are now in control.


24 posted on 12/31/2012 9:58:59 AM PST by SgtHooper (The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

“deliberately avoid contributing ought...”

With the flat tax, at least the one I would propose, there is no avoidance. Everybody pays something. Even if they have to take a loan.


25 posted on 12/31/2012 10:03:43 AM PST by SgtHooper (The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

There is contributing money now and there is also contributing well-raised individuals who will contribute in the future. Many people manage to avoid raising descendents who will amount to anything. A flat tax would need to be tweaked to encourage people to do anything about that.


26 posted on 12/31/2012 10:07:55 AM PST by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I don’t know why I should get tax breaks for having kids as well.

Because you are being responsible and raising up the next generation. Don’t think of it as you getting a tax break, it’s more a case of your children getting first dibs on your income until they become producers as well.


27 posted on 12/31/2012 10:35:06 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson