So they think our children are not as precious as the congresscritters, or the banks, and obama/soetoro/barry/whateverhisnameis is worth all the protection that guns can provide but, OUR KIDS have to be left defenseless
(answer - any way they can...)
What happened to the request? Did the GOP oppose it then?
Bookmark
Bookmark
Bookmark
Bookmark
Bookmark
Sorry, but federal funding for this stuff—even on the small scale Clinton proposed—was wrong then and—especially on the huge scale the NRA is proposing—now.
The Clinton program at least was aimed at inner-city schools where the students were so violent that they needed, and routinely have, armed guards.
Well, we’re broke, remember, and more deficit spending is a bad idea, so how much should taxes go up to pay for the guards and increased mental health treatment?
LIBERAL HYPOCRISY ON DISPLAY!
Just an armed guard at the door to examine a child or teacher's backpack or briefcase on entry, then buzz them in. Same for visitors or strangers, only more intensive, and with permission from the office.
I've worked in several GE and DuPont research facilities, and visited in several more customers' plants. Works well everywhere, daily, for every entry or exit.
These companies don't require that the population or their own employees turn in their firearms. Just don't bring them to work. Ammo or drugs -- get a trained dog to sit with the guards.
What is the problem with these emptyheaded media, government, and agitator hacks? Even the NRA lackeys!
Forget making laws! Just suggest this to school boards, and let the local administration fund and implement it. Get the Feds and State out of it!
Leftist kneejerk reaction against anything proposed by the NRA. Not only is their response hypocritical, it makes no sense. They demand a ban on ARs or high cap mags. Even IF that were effective it is useless against any other form of threat. A guard can react to multiple types of attacks, even those not involving guns. Its a flexible and sensible response commonly used to defend valuable targets. The left is not against it because it won’t work, their aim is destroy the NRA and 2nd ammendment.
Not much sense in having the police in schools if they can’t carry guns. One liberal I was explaining this to told me perhaps they could carry Tasers. Meanwhile, go to all government office buildings and you’ll be hard press to find police without a gun.
bookmark
Liberal writing against this Breitbart article:
http://www.politicususa.com/bitter-crazy-breitbart-writer-thinks-clintons-cops-progam-nra.html
This is a great piece of research here.
Excellent!