Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rupert Murdoch, Fox News Owner, Calls for Automatic Weapons Ban
Politico ^ | Dec. 14, 2012 | Dylan Byers

Posted on 12/15/2012 3:29:02 PM PST by VitacoreVision

Terrible news today. When will politicians find courage to ban automatic weapons? As in Oz after similar tragedy. - Rupert Murdoch | Twitter

++++

News Corp. chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch expressed support for an automatic weapons ban tonight following today's shooting in Newtown, Conn.

"Terrible news today. When will politicians find courage to ban automatic weapons?," Murdoch wrote on Twitter.

Murdoch made a similar call following the theater shooting in Aurora, Colo., in July: "We have to do something about gun controls. Police license okay for hunting rifle or pistol for anyone without crim or pscho record. No more," he tweeted.

News Corp. owns Fox News, where contributors have been objecting to calls for gun control throughout the day.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; foxnews; guncontrol; rupertmurdoch; sandyhookpolitics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: SaxxonWoods

Lots of booklets out there tell how...guess we need to ban books.


41 posted on 12/15/2012 5:01:57 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yarddog; All

“They weren’t actually banned. The congress purposely didn’t do an outright ban because they thought the Supreme Court would declare the law unconstitutional.”

Technically they aren’t banned, correct. In practice they are all but banned. First there are significant hurdles to jump through before you can buy one legally.

Secondly, the restrictions on which weapons can be purchased have caused their prices to skyrocket. Putting them out of reach for the majority of the population.


42 posted on 12/15/2012 5:03:06 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

This ignorant limo-liberal elitist does not connect the Left’s effor to ban Fox to their effort to ban the second amendement. Banning the constitution is the Leftist “liberal” cause. Going Chi-com like GE?


43 posted on 12/15/2012 5:04:22 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents; Forward the Light Brigade

“We need to get these folks in mental hospitals! They need to be rounded up and locked away for their own good. Once this was common—it needs to be re-instated...We need to take care of people who are nuts. Lots of people need these institutions—now.”

Well stated...we need to round up all the narcissist left nuts in office first...starting with those in the White Hut, the one in NYC City Hall, all of their left nut lamestream media shills...institutionalise them now!


44 posted on 12/15/2012 5:09:00 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

Not really something to joke about in a public forum these days. The walls have ears. And eyes too.


45 posted on 12/15/2012 5:09:44 PM PST by Vermont Lt (We are so screwed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

For some unknown reason, I’ve been watching FNC coverage of the shootings..

Bill Hemmer’s sappy stories are just too much. Shouldn’t this be called what it is? Exploitation: an unnecessary focus on grieving families all for the sake of ratings.
And anyone who fell for the faux crying that Bamster supposedly did on national TV the other day is a fool.

Sorry Rog, Rupie, Bill and the Blonds: this is sickening and I’m atta here.
I will grieve for the loss of those innocent children without your help, thank you. I know how to pray.
Maybe ‘National Lampoon Vacation” is on tonight.


46 posted on 12/15/2012 5:10:29 PM PST by Mountain Mary (Pray for our Republic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

I call on Rupert to support a Federal Ban on Evil...however I warn you there would be a severe lack of politicians left in DC. Tiny details...


47 posted on 12/15/2012 5:12:24 PM PST by JohnD9207 (Isn't freedom worth fighting for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision; cripplecreek

What cripplecreek said.

I am willing to make one, and only one, exception to the First Amendment when it comes to political speech. I believe that once you have an armed bodyguard you should be required to keep your piehole shut about access to firearms. I’m pretty sure Rupert has an armed bodyguard.


48 posted on 12/15/2012 5:17:49 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Cigarettes are like squirrels: Perfectly harmless until you put one in your mouth and set it on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I believe that once you have an armed bodyguard you should be required to keep your piehole shut about access to firearms.

LOL I like it.
49 posted on 12/15/2012 5:19:27 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

almost nobody has an automatic weapon because of the extra paperwork and extra few hundred bucks.

the guy in this shooting had no automatic weapons. murdoch fail...


50 posted on 12/15/2012 5:23:06 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision
Uh, Rupert -- or "A-hole," if you prefer -- for all intents and purposes, automatic weapons are already banned. The only people who can readily get automatic weapons in this country are --

(get ready for it)...
(drum roll......)

CRIMINALS.

51 posted on 12/15/2012 5:28:25 PM PST by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Oral Flatulence from the Jerk from Australia who had his henchmen help defeat conservative candidates and replace them with a flip-flopping RINO destined to loose.

Banning Semi-Automatic Weapons will NEVER take them out of the hands of lunatics and criminals - just law abiding citizens. FURTHER, when such a ban does NOT work, they will be coming after every other gun anyone owns.

THis is not logic, its emotion, And the world’s BIGGEST Emotion Pimp, Barack Hussein Obama, is ALREADY triangulating to try and disarm America using this and similar human tragedies for his own nefarious and evil ends.


52 posted on 12/15/2012 5:37:15 PM PST by ZULU (See video: http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-first-siege-of-vienna.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

These @$$h@les just don’t get it. The right to keep and bear arms is the last defense against tyranny. Hitler proved that in Germany when he confiscated guns.


53 posted on 12/15/2012 5:40:31 PM PST by kenmcg (scapegoat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

54 posted on 12/15/2012 5:48:32 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

“We hold these truths to be self-evident......governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever a government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it...”

one of the MOST IMPORTANT PHRASES in the Declaration, and, of course IMPOSSIBLE without access to firearms. And the Emotion Pimp in the White House knows it.


55 posted on 12/15/2012 5:56:17 PM PST by ZULU (See video: http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-first-siege-of-vienna.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Yep. The next overreaching law they pass, might be the straw that broke the long-suffering camel’s back.

Would you surrender your semi-auto pistols and rifles, if so ordered?

I wouldn’t, and neither would millions of us. The statists might be calculating that this is just the crisis they need, to totally crack down on and smash the “bitter clingers.”

Classic overreach. A law too far.


56 posted on 12/15/2012 6:01:30 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Can’t stand sweet drinks and I like to stay warm and dry


57 posted on 12/15/2012 6:10:30 PM PST by 4everontheRight (And the story began with..."Once there was a great nation......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Criminals and assassins often use guns to commit their crimes because they are in fact the most effective and also most convenient means to their ends.

They are also the most effective way to prevent criminal activity and this is not just for convenience.

Even if we lived in a total dictatorship with all weapons banned, the criminal element would still find all the weapons they would ever need.

I have read that one reason Robert Bruce defeated the English at Bannockburn despite being outnumbered 3 to 1, was that many of the Scottish fighters used their farming tools as weapons. Since they used them on a daily basis they were very familiar with how they handled.

A screwdriver makes a fine dagger, a kitchen knife works on people too. A bucket of gasoline and a match would likely kill everyone in a schoolroom. An axe is a fearsome weapon as is a short shovel, a pitchfork or a hiking stick.

Gun control not only doesn’t prevent crime, it helps the criminal element while harming the innocent.


58 posted on 12/15/2012 6:14:05 PM PST by yarddog (One shot one miss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I do not intend to turn my guns over either, assuming that I have any which would be made illegal.

On the other hand I also don’t intend to stand in the door with my rifle and dare them to come and get them.

The whole subject could spark a lot of ideas and discussions. I don’t think the old “I lost them in a boating accident” would work either.

Saying I needed the money and sold them at gun shows etc. might be believed. I am sure others have better ideas than I do as to elude them. In the end it just might be a firefight which I know I would lose but there would be a lot of ideas tried before it came to that.

If I and a lot of others made the job too dangerous that might be enough, even tho many of us would lose our life.


59 posted on 12/15/2012 6:28:41 PM PST by yarddog (One shot one miss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Or Mr. Murdoch, no amount of gun control laws would have stopped a demon possed gun shooter who was intent on slaugthering little children and their teachers.


60 posted on 12/15/2012 6:43:19 PM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson