Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Contact points here: http://www.house.mi.gov/mhrpublic/

Skip this koranimal ->

1 posted on 12/13/2012 2:30:22 PM PST by bayouranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Springman; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; madison10; ...
Lets hope Rick Snyder is fully finished trying to deal with deal breakers.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Weekly/biweekly Michigan legislative activism thread December 7, 2012
2 posted on 12/13/2012 2:33:41 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bayouranger

If we have elements of Sharia Law already going on in Michigan. Why cannot we just add that all muslims must move out of Michigan? Dearborn is the capitol home of the Muslim population in Michigan. If the Muslims insist on Sharia. Than I must insist that the Amish laws be installed immediately, Also all the Laws of Judaism and the 640 laws of the Pharisees be installed too. Islam is a false religion rooted in Satanism.


3 posted on 12/13/2012 2:42:10 PM PST by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bayouranger

Guess they’ve never played cowboys and muslims yet ....


4 posted on 12/13/2012 2:44:08 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bayouranger
Why in hell is this "group" still allowed any voice in the USA, let alone still IN the USA?

FMCDH(BITS)

6 posted on 12/13/2012 3:21:58 PM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bayouranger

Who gives a damn what CAIR does or thinks. Communists, the whole damn organization.


7 posted on 12/13/2012 3:50:28 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bayouranger; All
Based on his experience as VP and president of the Senate, Constitution expert Thomas Jefferson had officially written in Senate Parliamentary Manual that Congress cannot use the Senate's power to negotiate treaties as a back door to force USA citizens to comply with foreign laws based on powers which the states have never delegated to Congress via the Constitution.
"In giving to the President and Senate a power to make treaties, the Constitution meant only to authorize them to carry into effect, by way of treaty, any powers they might constitutionally exercise." --Thomas Jefferson: The Anas, 1793.

"Surely the President and Senate cannot do by treaty what the whole government is interdicted from doing in any way." --Thomas Jefferson: Parliamentary Manual, 1812.

More specifically, if the Senate needs a specific power in order to negotiate a treaty which the states have never delegated to Congress via the Constitution, Article V requires the Senate to work with HoR to propose an appropriate amendment to the Constitution to the states. And if the states choose to ratify the proposed amendment, then Congress will have the specific power that it needs to negotiote the treaty.

Thats the way it's supposed to work anyway.

Sadly, Congress managed to snow the Supreme Court to use this back door when the Court decided Missouri v. Holland.

Missouri v. Holland

Also, despite PC interpretations of the Supremacy Clause, Clause 2 of Article VI, note that this clause only works when the states have delegated to Congress, via the Constitution, the specific power to address a given issue.

Otherwise, the Founding States made the 10th Amendment to clarify that the Constitution's silence on any issue, healthcare, retirement, public schools, the environment, etc., is to be interpreted as meaning that the states have automatically reserved such powers uniquely to themselves.

Again, that's the way that it's supposed to work.

8 posted on 12/13/2012 5:36:55 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bayouranger

anti-Islam = pro-Freedom


10 posted on 12/13/2012 5:41:10 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bayouranger

If people really want to live under Sharia law, they should pack up and MOVE to countries that are under their law of choice. To come to America and think they can uproot our very Constitution is just as crazy as an American moving to Pakistan and expecting to have the same freedoms he enjoyed in America. Would Pakistan change its constitution for American Christians? Don’t think so!


15 posted on 12/13/2012 10:07:25 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bayouranger

Figures! Muslims are not bound by man-made laws but allah’s. The koranic answer lies in surah 5, ayat 51. For muslims only islam trumps the Constitution.


19 posted on 12/14/2012 5:31:34 AM PST by existentially_kuffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bayouranger

Figures! Muslims are not bound by man-made laws but allah’s. The koranic answer lies in surah 5, ayat 51. For muslims only islam trumps the Constitution.


28 posted on 12/14/2012 6:57:53 PM PST by existentially_kuffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bayouranger

Placemark.

If you decide to make a “Truth of Islam” placemark, please add me.


30 posted on 12/16/2012 3:19:30 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson