Posted on 12/11/2012 7:23:11 PM PST by redk
South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R) has narrowed her list of potential Senate appointees down to five — including the state’s former first lady Jenny Sanford. A person close to the process confirms that the five names under “active consideration” are Sanford, Rep. Tim Scott, Rep. Trey Gowdy, former state attorney general Henry McMaster and Catherine Templeton, the director of the state Department of Health and Environmental Control.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Tim Scott yes. Jenny Stanford??? WTF?
Some sort of residency is a requirement. I don’t know the specifics. Residency is established in a variety of ways. IOW you can’t have someone with no connection to a state. Say a Newt Gingrich who is from GA but resides in the DC area, doesn’t lift a finger to establish a SC residency, suddenly being named a senator. I remember Hillary was not from NY but was determined to be its senator so she had to establish a residency there...the specifics might vary from state to state.
People have been saying that the House Speaker doesn’t have to even be a House member, and that is true. But that is very different than there being no residency requirement to run for office from a congressional district or from a state.
But I doubt she will name anyone not from SC. S Carolinians are crazy in love with being from SC. Period. Talk about angry if she named someone not from there.
Just looking at her history can be a clue to what she will do.
She enthusiastically campaigned for Mitt Romney so I would take a look at the field of ‘contenders’ to see which one endorsed her decision.
The other factor which may be in play here is which one of the field actively supported her campaign for Governor.
My personal opinion is will be looking at the current state of mind in the country that Conservatism is wandering in the political wilderness and will select on that basis.
South Carolina PingJenny Sanford? Where did that come from?
Scot or Gowdy, gotta be.
I'd prefer Scott since he's: 1. A Conservative, 2. A black, 3. From a southern state.
I hope Trey will challenge Linda in 2014.
South Carolina PingJenny Sanford? Where did that come from?
Scot or Gowdy, gotta be.
I'd prefer Scott since he's: 1. A Conservative, 2. A black, 3. From a southern state.
I hope Trey will challenge Linda in 2014.
Several Representatives too.
"Reconstruction saw the election of an African American senator, Hiram Revels of Mississippi, and several members of the House from the South. After a brief period of Republican control in the South which saw major improvements in the lives of African Americans, Southern states instituted new laws aimed at intimidating black political activities."
From 41-42nd Congress
What about Alan “You Lie” Wilson?
S Carolinians are crazy in love with being from SC. Period.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Speaking as a South Carolinian whose heritage extends back past my great grandfather, the confederate soldier born 100 years before me, I am highly offended by that statement, you Rangerettes obviously know NOTHING about Carolina, the truth is we are JUST PLAIN CRAZY!!!
dittos. Jenny Sanford, no way.
We need to keep Wilson where he is, in the House.
We need to keep Wilson where he is, in the House. And it’s Joe.
Tim Scott would be a great pick.
DeMint type Tea Party conservative.
We cannot afford to lose a strong conservative and get another seat-warmer.
Forget seat warmers. Get the man we want in so he’s in. An open seat means be could lose to some douche and that no one viable will consider running against Graham in the primary.
And while I HATE creating House vacancies, we won’t lose that seat.
The SC seat I’d worry about is SC-07. The non-viable Black democrat from Georgia did as well as Obama in the district, they might have won with a better candidate.
Those should definitely be SC’s two senators, and I would think it to Haley’s advantage to name Scott here.
The SC-07 has the second-largest black population in the state (after the black-majority SC-06) and held Romney to 54.5%, so it is as Republican as the state as a whole (Romney got 54.6% statewide). The fact that the black liberal Democrat from GA who ran for Congress in SC-07 basically matched Obama’s vote percentage should not surprise anyone, since Democrats not turned off by Obama wouldn’t oppose her either. And while some good-ol’-boy “moderate” Democrat (if he can win the nomination despite blacks and liberals forming a large majority of the Dem primary electorate) might increase the Dems’ percentage of the white vote, Congressman Rice has two advantages going forward: (i) 2014 is a non-presidential year, and black turnout will be much lower, and (ii) in 2016 and beyond, he’ll be fairly entrenched, plus black turnout is unlikely to match 2012 levels without Obama on the ballot (plus Horry County is growing so fast that the white percentage of the CD’s population probably will grow).
I find it surprising that “Just-Us” didn’t force SC to draw a 2nd Black majority district (not counting Scott). Still, if we have a bad turnout year, the Dems could conceivably take a majority under the current lines. If we keep it at 6-1 for the remainder of the decade, no worries, though if we lose any of the seats, drawing a 2nd seat to keep the other 5 safe is something to consider for 2022.
As you may recall, I preferred drawing a second black-majority CD in SC, which would (i) protect against the possibility of judicial redrawing of the districts, (ii) keep 5 CDs 100% safe for Republicans and (iii) make it extremely difficult for RATs to draw a map that favored Democrats if they gained control of the SC legislature and governorship by 2022 (since it would violate the VRA not to have 2 black-majority CDs once they have been created). But that’s just me: I’m a strong proponent of “safety first” and of packing Democrats whenever possible even at the cost of picking up an extra GOP CD. If we hold a 6-1 delegation for the rest of the decade—and the only seats truly at risk are Mulvaney’s SC-05 and Rice’s SC-07 (the SC-01 and SC-2 are theoretically winnable for Dems, but at 59% for Romney in spite of historic black turnout I’m not too concerned about them), I think that Republicans should go for 6-1 again in 2022 by expanding the black-majority SC-06 (which likely will need to pick up population once again) to take in black precincts in the SC-05 and SC-07, and have the SC-03 and SC-04 take in some more marginal (due to relatively large black population) counties to their south, and thus draw 6 CDs that are a couple of points more Republican than the state as a whole.
The irony that the very election and presence of Tim Scott in SC-1 is proof positive that the VRA should be done away with (ditto Democrat Steven Horsford in the new NV-4). It is nothing but protection for Democrat seats, for which Republicans enjoy no such similar measures (aside from perhaps the Cuban seats in Florida, but that didn’t help us to hold all three).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.