Posted on 12/10/2012 5:50:12 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
Your problem, not mine. I neither lie nor exaggerate about matters of science. It's a question of personal ethics.
"Pull some one else's leg. You liked it.
Only in your imagination.
"It was still flamebait regardless, for this forum and though Krivit otherwise a critic of Rossi, still mentioned him in a positive light? Inconsistent.
Is this sentence supposed to make some kind of sense?? WTF are you talking about?? The posted article?? Krivit?? The ONE SENTENCE that refers Rossi??
"That was part of the bait, whether you planned it or not."
Still not getting your point.
"I guess you can see that by now, so some progress has been made."
All I see is that you have a very fertile imagination.
It wasn't about the "science". But you've got the play dumb portion of the denial/ego/self preservation act down pat.
Only in your imagination.
If you didn't like the editorial tone of the article, why did YOU bring it here? Oh, that's right, it was just first stop not "E-CAT" GARBAGE. And it fit like a glove with your overall approach nicely. No imagination needed to see it. Why do you keep lying about it?
Is this sentence supposed to make some kind of sense??
In context with all the rest, why yes. If you can't see it --- why how convenient for you! I have to repeat everything all over again each post? The writer began with "tattooed on the foreheads", then finished with calling Rossi -- what was it --- a leader? Perfect for the revenge seekers...like you.
Still not getting your point.
That you are a prick, when it comes to LENR? What's so hard to get about that?
All I see is that you have a very fertile imagination.
You wish.
It certainly was "about the science", specifically the Imawura conference talk.
"If you didn't like the editorial tone of the article, why did YOU bring it here?
Didn't say I didn't like it. Didn't say I did. I simply didn't pay attention to it. My sole interest in the article was that it was a gateway to the Imawura information.
"Oh, that's right, it was just first stop not "E-CAT" GARBAGE.
Yes, it was.
"And it fit like a glove with your overall approach nicely. No imagination needed to see it.
Why don't you lay out what my "overall approach" is.
"Why do you keep lying about it?
Because I'm not lying about it.
"The writer began with "tattooed on the foreheads"
LOL, I didn't even SEE that particular line.
".....then finished with calling Rossi -- what was it --- a leader?
Yes.....ONE SENTENCE out of the entire article. And I've already told you in what sense I consider it to be correct. Fraud or not a fraud, Rossi has blown open the wall of the cold fusion ghetto, and brought the real science of LENR into public view.
"Perfect for the revenge seekers...like you.
So you fly into a fit of rage when an article criticizes those who have fraudulently attacked LENR? A criticism from a blog owner who is himself critical of Rossi??
"That you are a prick, when it comes to LENR? What's so hard to get about that?"
As I said, a very fertile imagination. But I begin to understand. You're upset because your fraud-perpetuating heros have failed to keep LENR suppuressed, and have been called on the carpet for it. And indeed, I "am" a prick about FRAUD. That might be because I'm interested in finding out what is true and what isn't.
whatever blows your skirts up mr. scientist. tell it to the hand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.