Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: agere_contra
Your plan - such as it is - would be to institute financial repression. You would wall up capital so that it couldn’t move out of the country and also force Americans to buy protected, Government-approved brands.

Protected, Goverment approved brands would be anything and everything made in the U.S., by American workers...And it wouldn't affect any money moving out of the U.S...People would still be free to move any or all of their money out of the U.S...

The question is; is it still worthwhile for a company to make and sell American made goods in America...I'd say definitely so...If it turns out that excessive regulations prevent a certain good(s) from being available to the general public, pressure on Washington would be so great that there would be an immediate cessation of those regulations...

The thing that controls prices is competition...Something innovative Americans are very good at...

113 posted on 11/22/2012 9:47:53 AM PST by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Iscool
The thing that controls prices is competition...Something innovative Americans are very good at...

and if government got out of the way they'd compete again like they did in the olden days

122 posted on 11/22/2012 9:56:49 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: Iscool
The thing that controls prices is competition...Something innovative Americans are very good at

Respectfully no, Iscool.

You can't claim that competition controls prices if there's a tariff on foreign goods.

Once you protect domestic industry you don't get a competitive industry. You get a feather-bedded industry that no longer needs to compete on the world stage, a toxic increase of Government, and domestic consumers who are cost-pushed to buy the uncompetitive domestic product.

And with Government 'protecting' domestic industry you also get a) picking of winners and losers and b) protection of unionized industries and campaign-contributors only.

A good historical example here is British Leyland, a major UK car manufacturer that was 'protected' by tariffs. It didn't magically get better - it got worse until it crashed and burnt. Its slow-motion demise cost the taxpayers an arm and a leg.

A good modern example here is GM. The major US car manufacturer (and union pensions provider!) that was 'protected' using the non-tariff remedies of massive, illegal Government debt-forgiveness and contract awards. Has GM cars magically got better thanks to the 'helping hand of Government'? I think we all know the answer to that.

139 posted on 11/22/2012 10:10:33 AM PST by agere_contra ("An unjust law ceases to be a law: it becomes an act of violence". Thomas Aquinas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson