To: FreeReign; huldah1776; DoughtyOne; FredZarguna
So then the source is unidentified and we don't know if Petreus really blamed the video.
Here's an identified source:
Al Qaeda Took Advantage of Libyan Protest, CIA Chief Says
"The attack that killed four Americans in the Libyan consulate began as a spontaneous protest against the film The Innocence of Muslims, but Islamic militants who may have links to Al Qaeda used the opportunity to launch an attack, CIA Director David Petreaus told the House Intelligence Committeetoday according to one lawmaker who attended a closed-door briefing.
Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the top Democrat on the House Intel committee, said Petraeus laid out a chronological order exactly what we felt happened, how it happened, and where were going in the future.
In the Benghazi area, in the beginning we feel that it was spontaneous the protest- because it went on for two or three hours, which is very relevant because if it was something that was planned, then they could have come and attacked right away, Ruppersberger, D-Md., said following the hour-long briefing by Petraeus. At this point it looks as if there was a spontaneous situation that occurred and that as a result of that, the extreme groups that were probably connected to al Qaeda took advantage of that situation and then the attack started.
Petraeus did not speak to reporters on his way in or out of the briefing. When he left the meeting, the former four-star general was trailed by about a dozen intelligence officials and a couple of Capitol police officers.
Members of the Senate Armed Services Committee were also briefed today by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Vice Chair of the Joint Chiefs Admiral James Winnefeld. But senators emerging from that private briefing reported that they believed the attack in Libya was premeditated."...............
So the House, briefed by Petraeus and other CIA types comes away thinking it was a spontaneous event that went on for two or three hours and THEN terrorists took advantage of later, but the Senate, briefed by Panetta and Vice Chair Joint Chiefs think the attack was premeditated?
huh.....
200 posted on
10/26/2012 6:26:05 PM PDT by
Girlene
To: Girlene
We have plenty of evidence that shows the entire area around the mission was quiet...silent...up until the attach began.
201 posted on
10/26/2012 6:28:52 PM PDT by
IrishPennant
(Dr Erkel and Mr. Jive...lurking the streets of DC)
To: Girlene
OK, it looks like the “house divided”.
Now what does it take to impeach, both the senate and the house TOGETHER?
Hmmmm.......
309 posted on
10/27/2012 7:44:30 AM PDT by
WildHighlander57
((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
To: Girlene; FreeReign; huldah1776; FredZarguna
So then the source is unidentified and we don't know if Petreus really blamed the video.
Here's an identified source: Al Qaeda Took Advantage of Libyan Protest, CIA Chief Says
"The attack that killed four Americans in the Libyan consulate began as a spontaneous protest against the film The Innocence of Muslims, but Islamic militants who may have links to Al Qaeda used the opportunity to launch an attack, CIA Director David Petreaus told the House Intelligence Committee today according to one lawmaker who attended a closed-door briefing.
Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the top Democrat on the House Intel committee, said Petraeus laid out a chronological order exactly what we felt happened, how it happened, and where were going in the future.
In the Benghazi area, in the beginning we feel that it was spontaneous the protest- because it went on for two or three hours, which is very relevant because if it was something that was planned, then they could have come and attacked right away, Ruppersberger, D-Md., said following the hour-long briefing by Petraeus. At this point it looks as if there was a spontaneous situation that occurred and that as a result of that, the extreme groups that were probably connected to al Qaeda took advantage of that situation and then the attack started.
Petraeus did not speak to reporters on his way in or out of the briefing. When he left the meeting, the former four-star general was trailed by about a dozen intelligence officials and a couple of Capitol police officers.
Members of the Senate Armed Services Committee were also briefed today by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Vice Chair of the Joint Chiefs Admiral James Winnefeld. But senators emerging from that private briefing reported that they believed the attack in Libya was premeditated."
So the House, briefed by Petraeus and other CIA types comes away thinking it was a spontaneous event that went on for two or three hours and THEN terrorists took advantage of later, but the Senate, briefed by Panetta and Vice Chair Joint Chiefs think the attack was premeditated?
huh.....
Sounds strange doesn't it.
The top Democrat on the House Intel Committee, Dutch Ruppersberger is our source for Petraeus comments?
These days, I wouldn't trust a Democreat to give me directions to the restroom.
I appreciate the post.
318 posted on
10/27/2012 11:50:54 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(You know, if Obama wins he's going to inherit a terrible situation.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson