Posted on 10/20/2012 12:09:49 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
“You know, it made it sound almost like working women are some mail-order product you can order out of colored binders...."
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
“Vote with your lady parts” - Barack Obama
Where’s the outrage over that?
I don't know what you are talkiig about. Sometimes he just writes about what political characters say, but sometimes he does add comments. For example, here is a Jeff Poor article: Whoopi Goldberg blows it on Mormonism and military service
It's such a pathetic attempt that I don't think any but Obama and feminazi believers will swallow it. Google Jessica Yellin and you won't find much. This should disappear from the news pretty quickly.
good thing they did not write about Fonz’s “little black book” which consisted of filing cabinets.
There is another pro obama article on FR today that was authored by this poor fellow... I have a firm opinion of him from his present published words.
LLS
Ha! (VIDEO) Creepy: Biden Invites Romney To His House to Find Women
"Another?" I can't find one.
These people would do this country a greater service if they worried less about a binder and more about the irresponsibility, lies and coverup of a terrorist attack that murdered four Americans.
LOL! And the 'lady parts' program degraded us down to categorizing us by sexual organ....so what was this brainless twits problem, again?
Libs are like the followers of islam.
If they can't find something to be *offended* over, they'll just make it up.
He obviously meant binder with women’s resumes. Just how stupid are these people? Oh... but there ARE 57 states don’t ya know.
OMG!
Look at those shoes! Her taste is in her mouth!
I'm nowhere near a fashion plate but who the hell wears black clogs with socks and black socks at that. With a beige outfit no less.
Whoever took that pic as 'stock' must not have liked her very much, that's for sure. LOL!
Don't forget the poor cop that got keelhauled just because he was trying to eat a banana while working at a parade.
Face it. This is ALL they have and with the new media, they can't cover up the truth anymore.
-----
Thanks for the ping, BTW.
The women’s movement seemed to have a very flawed goal from the get-go. Yes, women working outside the home sounded good, but then they also picked the absolute worst behaviors of men, and tried to mirror them as if all men had been exhibiting those behaviors.
“Some almost exclusively single” guys used to go to strip shows. The guys who did were highly regulated as to what they could or couldn’t do. “You can’t touche the women.” All off a sudden it was suddenly cool if all women were to engage in that behavior. They WERE NOT regulated in what they could do in those places. “You can stuff those dollars anywhere you like and touch anything you like.” And in this instance, suddenly it was even kosher for married women and Moms to participate. My God, what a great example for daughters. /s
It was a real mess. Thankfully that seems to have died off somewhat.
To your point, you’re exactly right. The movement was very detrimental to women. It fostered an atmosphere that was very destructive IMO.
Going to these places was more or less men’s dirty little secret. With women, it was so cool to say you participated in. Very strange.
That’s quite possible. Mitt was my vision of a guy that would have a very hard time differentiating himself from Obama. He’s done better than I thought he would, but that is honestly because Obama didn’t take a run at him on a few obvious matters.
I’m not going to name them. I don’t think that’s productive, but your take on it isn’t unreasoned at all.
I’d like to think they’re interested in the same things, but they sure don’t demonstrate that.
I have this little theory about the election dynamic, and I think it’s one most people don’t consider.
Have you noticed how women key in on the personalities of other women, and pretty well know them for exactly who they are? They in general do better than men do, at judging other women.
I think men peg other men much more accurately than women do. Guys can tell when another guy is going to use a woman. Women don’t have a fricken clue that they’re being used. Men know.
I think this plays into the voting, because most candidates are still men, obviously most acute at the presidential level.
I’ll admit this is somewhat of a generality, but I think it’s a lot closer to the mark than some folks will want to admit.
Women get infatuated, or just favorably impressed with certain men and just can’t admit they may have been wrong.
I don’t know how else to explain the Obama factor. They just think he’s so cool. I wonder what would happen if they were to find out he was into men.
Yeah? LOL
Lefty wackjobs are on a binder bender.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.