Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Stevens: 'Maybe You Have Some Kind of Constitutional Right to a Cell Phone...'
CNS News.com ^ | 10/16/2012 | Melanie Hunter

Posted on 10/17/2012 7:11:14 AM PDT by VRWCmember

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, speaking at an event hosted by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence’s Legal Action Project, said Monday said that having “some kind of constitutional right to a cell phone with a predialed 911 at your bedside might be better protection than a gun.”

“I’m not sure I actually have captured the entire question, but it does occur to me that one thing that I thought about from time to time is that maybe you have some kind of constitutional right to have a cell phone with a predialed 911 number at your bedside, and that might provide you with a little better protection than a gun, which you’re not used to using,” Stevens said.

Jonathan Lowy, Brady Center Legal Action Project director, read a question from the audience, saying: “The Supreme Court held that the 2nd Amendment assures our right to have a handgun in the home for self-defense as you say. This question’s asked: ‘That protects only gun owners. What about those who don’t have guns? Surely they have a right of self-defense. Instead of relying on the 2nd Amendment and dealing with gun laws, wouldn’t it be more rational to rely directly on the right we all have to self-defense. What are your thoughts on that?’

Stevens was appointed to the high court in 1975 by President Gerald Ford. He retired in 2010. He is considered the third-longest serving justice.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; dial911anddie; electionsmatter; supremecourt; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
Just Wow! An incoherent and idiotic response to an incoherent and idiotic question.
1 posted on 10/17/2012 7:11:21 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

George Washington used ATT. Adams was a Verizon guy. Jefferson preferred sprint. It’s right there in the Constitution, just before the right to abortion.


2 posted on 10/17/2012 7:14:16 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (When the Obama poster fades, the portrait of Che Guevara beneath it shows through.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

I think mental retardation should be a disqualifier for SCOTUS


3 posted on 10/17/2012 7:14:33 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Such an embarrassment.

Reflects badly on those who supported his elevation to the Supremes.

4 posted on 10/17/2012 7:14:44 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Good Lord.


5 posted on 10/17/2012 7:15:13 AM PDT by Lazamataz (WAAAAAAAAAHHHhhhhh.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
link to story, click the video to hear both the question and the incoherent response.
6 posted on 10/17/2012 7:15:50 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Yo, Judge!

You get a cell phone to work next to my bed, or ANYWHERE on my property and I’ll kiss your @$$.


7 posted on 10/17/2012 7:16:16 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

He’s been on the job too long... (or, good thing he’s retired).


8 posted on 10/17/2012 7:16:16 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, speaking at an event hosted by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence’s Legal Action Project, said Monday said that having “some kind of constitutional right to a cell phone with a predialed 911 at your bedside might be better protection than a gun.”

This Justice is some kind of moron.Imagine.Your in your bed sleeping.Someone breaks into your home and you awake to the sound of breaking glass.Now your going to protect your life by using a cell phone to call 911.

By the time the local Police Come you or your family would be dead.

Thanks Mr. Justice.I’ll stick to having a gun Nearby.


9 posted on 10/17/2012 7:17:34 AM PDT by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

His physical and mental decline will be portrayed onscreen by Meryl Streep.


10 posted on 10/17/2012 7:17:37 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
The root of the problem with this question is the new fuzzy thinking with regard to 'rights'... the notion that the right to pursue a thing is the same as the right to the thing outright.

You have the right to own property... say for example, a house. That doesn't mean the country owes you a house.

Equal opportunity is not the same thing as equal outcomes. The first is a right; the second is not.

11 posted on 10/17/2012 7:17:50 AM PDT by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Our SCOTUS is a disgrace. They are now pondering the question: should proof of citizenship be required to register to vote? This ‘august’ body shredded the Constitution with their ruling on Obamacare. The Bill would never have passed if the ‘mandate’ had been called a ‘tax’ originally. This SCOTUS changed the letter and the intent and didn't send the Law back for a re-vote. Does anyone think they care if non-citizens vote to sway our elections? Every one of them SWORE TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION! We are being destroyed from within! Stevens is not an aberration, his ‘overthinking’ of the Constitution seems to be the rule with the modern SCOTUS. Living, breathing Constitution my ***.
12 posted on 10/17/2012 7:21:20 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

What is the victim gonna do with a govt provided phone? Hit the attacker over the head with it? UGH


13 posted on 10/17/2012 7:21:28 AM PDT by smith288 (Peace at all costs gives you tyranny free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
‘That protects only gun owners. What about those who don’t have guns? Surely they have a right of self-defense. Instead of relying on the 2nd Amendment and dealing with gun laws, wouldn’t it be more rational to rely directly on the right we all have to self-defense. What are your thoughts on that?’
My thoughts on that? The idiot who wrote that question has not one clue what is meant by self-defense. The only way to exercise "the right we all have to self-defense" is to defend your own freaking self with whatever means you have at your disposal, dumbass! If you call 911 on your constitutionally guaranteed pre-dialed cell phone, you are depending on someone else miles away to defend you. By definition, that is NOT self-defense.
14 posted on 10/17/2012 7:21:42 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

“Stop! Or I’ll dial!!!”


15 posted on 10/17/2012 7:21:50 AM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

“a predialed 911 at your bedside might be better protection than a gun.”

??

In order to what? Call someone to come over with a gun?

This election is as much about protecting us from idiocy as anything else.


16 posted on 10/17/2012 7:21:57 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

‘That protects only gun owners. What about those who don’t have guns? Surely they have a right of self-defense.”

Ummmm...get a gun? How hard is that? EVERYONE has the right to self defense...some simply choose to not excercise it. Tuff toenails.


17 posted on 10/17/2012 7:22:45 AM PDT by Adder (No Mo BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

I frequently ask my Lib relatives (I no longer keep Lib friends), in your world, what ISN’T a RIGHT?


18 posted on 10/17/2012 7:23:40 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
The root of the problem with this question is the new fuzzy thinking with regard to 'rights'... the notion that the right to pursue a thing is the same as the right to the thing outright.

This concept was called out by Canadian Supreme Court Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin when she wrote this: "Access to a waiting list is not access to health care."

19 posted on 10/17/2012 7:23:54 AM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
You nailed it! Stevens moved steadily to the Left as a Justice. We should be thankful, I guess, that he finally retired, before he got to this point. On the other hand, had he staid on till now, we might have had an opportunity to do a lot better in his replacement.

William Flax

20 posted on 10/17/2012 7:23:54 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson