Rupert Murdoch Predicts ‘Nightmare for Israel if Obama Wins,‘ WH ’Still Lying About Benghazi’

The Blaze ^ | October 13, 2012 | Madeleine Morgenstern

[2ndDivisionVet]

News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch went on a bit of a Twitter tear Saturday morning, predicting a “nightmare for Israel if Obama wins” re-election and accusing the White House of “still lying about Benghazi.”

The media mogul — whose company owns Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post and others — said Vice President Joe Biden “threw [the] CIA under the bus“ and ”now [White House] throws State [Department]!” He also came down on Mitt Romney, saying the Republican presidential nominee needs to ignore personal attacks at the next debate and focus on his jobs plan:(continued)

[2ndDivisionVet]

Obviously.

[Gene Eric]

Our attention should be turned to the Leftwing media/influence that’s managing to suppress the severity of Benghazi.

[Carriage Hill]

It was a set-up:

"Body Of Lies From Benghazi To Barack"...

"Weapons Hunting - The Reason For The 9-11 Murders In Libya"...

"While The Rest of You Have Been Distracted"...

[Fred Hayek]

If Obama is re-elected, it will be a nightmare for the United States as well. Not just Obama further destroying this nation, but also the Divine Judgements that will be poured out as well.

[drypowder]

a worse and immediate nightmare for the US I’d say

[NVDave]

Well, no duh.

My rejoinder, however, is “So what?”

When the dust settles, we will see that, once again, the majority of Jews in the US voted for Obama.

So if Obama destroys Israel, the Jews got what they wanted, because they voted for it. I see no reason for any person to contribute a dime or a moment of their time to trying to ‘save’ Israel if the Jews don’t want to.

[AFPhys]

I believe it is very important for all FReepers to listen to the first 18 minutes of the podcast of Larry Kudlow’s show today. He interviews Ed Klein about BenghaziGate.

Essentially - Ed Klein told Kudlow that it seems that Obama is going to either have to deny what VP Biden said in the debate, or that he is going to have to try to hang it on State Dept and Hillary. Meanwhile, the Clinton’s are preparing legally for such an eventuality, and will eviscerate Obama if he tries to do that. They also went through how information goes up from agencies such as embassies, up through the chain of command, to the daily NSA briefings that the president gets (whether he reads or hears them or not). Quite a nice, detailed, yet concise account of the process.

Here is a link to the Kudlow Podcast page:
http://wabcradio.com/sectional.asp?id=33448

Please listen to the first 18 minutes.!!!

[American Constitutionalist]

Thanks for the information.

You know very well Rush is going to bite into this juicy tidbit next Monday on his show.... having more fun that a human is allowed.

[GOPJ]

. Military and ideological defeat were predictable and the CIA aided in the quest against the Soviets. Part of the original objective of the United States (credited to Zbigniew Brzezinski and adopted by Presidents Carter and Reagan) was to arm key factions to fend off the Soviets.

These people are incapable of being loyal to either side. There's no reason for us to arm them - there's no reason for the Russians to arm them. If Russians want to throw their money down a rat hole and arm these people - fine. But it doesn't mean we have too.

Radical Muslims will sell out to the highest bidder for as long as the money is flowing. And not a minute longer. Check out our 'friends' in Pakistan... Money stops, loyalty stops.

We've been played for fools over there long enough.

[Carriage Hill]

Treacherous, murderous subhuman filth; all of them. We've wasted far too much precious blood and treasure on that ME sh•thole. Excepting Israel, our only ally there. They must be protected at all costs.

[jjotto]

The USA would have no need to ‘protect’ Israel at all if we didn’t extravagantly arm its declared enemies.

[Carriage Hill]

From a Biblical perspective, I disagree. 70% of the Jews here, aren’t Jewish; they’re liberal-demoncraps. Things will not end well, here on earth, if Israel is destroyed.

[Carriage Hill]

That bears repeating, again and again and again. Unfortunately, we’re well past that point in time now.

[Twinkie]

WWGWD? (What Would George Washington do?)

[Carriage Hill]

Good question.

[NVDave]

You can try to dismiss them as being Jews, but according to Jewish law, they’re Jewish (ie, born to a Jewish mother).

I don’t care what you or anyone else thinks they are. They call themselves Jews, they’re able to make that claim based on material lineage or religious affiliation, then they’re Jews. How they vote is their business, and if how they vote results in the destruction of Israel, then that’s what they wanted, and that’s what they got.

It isn’t my problem, much less my responsibility to solve it. It certainly required none of the money of the US taxpayer, especially since we have more than enough Jews who have the deep pockets that could prop up Israel if they wanted. But they don’t. When a group of people decide to do something stupid, I’m all for letting them suffer the consequences of their stupidity. Especially when the parties involved made their position so clearly known for so long.

Israel won’t be destroyed. The chunk of land called “Israel” will still be there. The Arabs aren’t exactly brimming with the sort of work ethic required to cart off all that land and spread it somewhere else and let the Med fill in the empty space. The Jews in Israel might be gone, but I’m pretty certain the land will still be there.

[NVDave]

Geo. Washington warned us in his farewell address against foreign entanglements.

The presidents of the US since Woodrow Wilson have decided to not listen, to our detriment.

[A.A. Cunningham]

nightmare