lol
He doesn't know?
The corpulant lady who happily sold herself to the devil for Obamacare will be shocked that when/if she ever makes it to the trough, it will have been licked clean. No cake, no frosting, no donuts, nada.
IMO, calling him a Communist is evidence of a person taking their eyes off the ball.
He’s a fundamentalist follower of Islam. As such, he can’t separate himself from the desires of other fundamentalist followers of Islam.
Now THAT is food for thought.
Sure he’s a socialist, but more importantly he’s actually a front man for the desires of fundamentalist followers of Islam. His goal is to end once and for all, the impact of the United States and it’s Western allies on global dynamics.
Watch 2016. It spells it out perfectly clear. He sees the U. S. as a colonialist power, and he thinks it needs to be neutered because it is (in his opinion).
He’s not doing this in the interest of world Communism. He’s doing it on behalf of the world’s oppressed, which just happen to be mostly Islamic in the circles he has lived in. His radical father weighed heavily upon him. His step dad did. Tack on radical heavily anti-U. S. influences he has been associated with in the U. S., and it becomes quite clear who this guy is, and what he wants to do.
sorry she didnt say more
Obama want the government to collect all your money, redistribute it, and then tell you how you're going to run your life. What else is this but communist?
Either the author is incredibly ignorant or incredibly dishonest. Or, then again, he could be both.
Here’s what I wish would be the question:
“Obama admitted being an avid follower of marxism in college - in his autobiography.
Has he ever said when he stopped?”
Progressive/communist—same thing.
At least this woman was smarter than the people who were interviewed by Howard Stern.
I think the tingling down Chrissy’s leg this time is from Chrissy peeing his pants.
The lady is right, Obama is a Communist. What evidence did anyone provide to refute her argument?
sfl
“You’re on national television here.”
Translation:
“I’m going to use the full force of the national media to try to humiliate and intimidate anyone who tries to call us what we are.”
“Needless to say, the woman didn’t even come close to making any kind of reasonable argument to back up her claim that Obama is actually a communist.”
Why did “The Blaze” throw that bit of state-run media bias into the article?
I’ve called him “Obammie the Commie” since 2008, blaze. Let me know if you want any kind of reasonable argument explaining why.
The evidence is so blatant, I wish they’d asked me. Read Karl Marx Communist Manifesto, the check list for it, is obviously siting on Owebama’s desk.
1) nationalization of private industry, Bank of America, General Motors—Owebama appointees run them
2) confiscation of personal and private property, $350 billion worth of properties bought off the banks and put in control of the nationalized Bank of America (Owebama’s first idea-—rent them back to the public).
3) control of the food supply, the many of those toxic assets were farms, look how controlling USDA has gotten, even to the point of controlling kids menu’s in schools (does anybody remember Hitler’s favorite Oxtail and cabbage soup that was all that was on the grocer’s shelves?)
4) separate the people from their faith
5) nationalization of health care
6) class warfare
7) abolition of inheritance rights (look at Owebama’s stance on that—he wants to take the biggest share of it)
And on top of that, he wants to throw islamofascism right on top of it, which is basically the same thing with a barbarianism thrown on top.
And why is Dear Reader's "mentor" (according to multiple sources) Frank Marshall Davis, a card-carrying Party member???
And don't even get me started on Bill Ayers.
Nah ... only stupid people would think Obozo was a communist, right Chrissy? /s
close, but wrong word MARXIST is the one I’d use
Billy Graham to endorse Mitt & Ryan
In the modern vernacular, Communist = euro social democrat
ping for later
Technically, I would call him a “socialist internationalist communist”. The Socialist International is an organization of national political parties around the world, whose rather ominous logo is a rose clenched in a fist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_International
The American Democrat party is a de facto member of the SI, but it is terrified of being recognized as such, as even they know that socialism is anathema in America, so must be concealed at all cost, and created in America through gradualism, guile, stealth and deceit.
Importantly, there are many Republican leaders that also embrace *some* of its ideas, if not membership, and they and the Democrats conceal this affiliation by calling themselves “internationalist”, “free trade”, and similar labels.
The SI should never be underestimated either for its determination, cunning or ruthlessness in advancing its agenda. They are such determined believers that they are incapable of recognizing when their schemes fall flat because they are inherently awful ideas.
So what are their hallmarks?
1) Internationalism before nationalism. They see nations as arbitrary creations of no inherent value, that are inherently bad because they create conflict to advance nationalist goals.
2) Equality is superior to any kind of individualism. Thus they reject ethnicity, language, culture, and both individual success and failure, in favor a gray mediocrity or even sub-mediocrity, which is easier to achieve.
In practice this is somewhat like the philosophy of a sheep herd. All members look identical. There is no initiative or action other than as the group as a whole. It is better that the herd all run off a cliff, than an individual sheep leads them to safety.
In human terms this was well described in the old, intensely socialist Sweden, where the very best career was said to be a poor, bad artist, as the government would do anything, pay you a fortune, so that you would no longer be bad, but mediocre. Yet if you sold a single painting, you would be completely cut off and ignored.
3) The factions of SI. Environmentalism, anti-militarism, multiculturalism, social engineering through ‘education’, etc.
Importantly, full nationalization has fallen out of favor among many socialists, who now prefer the national socialist economics model of “public-private partnerships” (like General Motors, or the crony capitalists in the green industries sponsored by the administration.) This was because with full nationalization, a lot of hard work is involved, but “ppp” is much easier.
As far as Obama goes, while his version of SI indeed has communist leanings, it is of the African, anti-colonialist playbook. In short, he sees America as a colonial power who can only be redeemed by reducing its international stature to the level of a “second world country”.