Posted on 10/08/2012 7:22:55 PM PDT by lward99
The YouTube video that spawned a wave of violent protests across the Islamic world might be more than a crude exercise in anti-Muslim propaganda.
Walid Shoebat, a Middle East pundit and reformed terrorist, says there is reason to believe that the “Innocence of Muslims” video was a hoax designed to spark the huge outpouring of Muslim rage that it did.
Shoebat, who claims he is related to a man who was involved in criminal activities with one of the video's producers, knows something about terrorists. He says he used to be one — a radicalized Muslim who, in his own words, was “willing to die for the cause of jihad.” He has since converted to Christianity and lives in the United States, where he writes and lectures widely on the Islamic terror threat.
Read more: http://times247.com/articles/98what-if-that-youtube-video-was-a-muslim-set-up3#ixzz28lBWOiPG
(Excerpt) Read more at times247.com ...
This possibility entered my mind a few days after the video became big news. The buildup in Germany to Hitler’s attempt to take over the world was accelerated by actions of “Agents Provocateur.” I’m sure the history of such trickery goes back much farther. One item less recognized or discussed is the relationship between Nazis and Muslims in the 1930’s - 1940’s. There is at least one picture of Hitler walking alongside the Mufti of Jerusalem, the uncle of Egyptian peace-prize winning Yasser Arafat. Any provocative issue that comes out of Egypt must be examined in this light.
http://www.shoebat.com/2012/09/27/innocence-of-muslims-film-was-made-by-terrorists-2/
Total incompetence?
This terrorist attack fits the pattern of the other terrorist attacks, civil unrest was orchestrated prior to the attack with phony and hyped news story.
The details may change for each attack, but the pattern doesn't change it stays the same. That's why I have ZERO doubts this plan was cooked up by Hillary.
Hillary is a 100% psychopath. She repeats herself.
The last attempted terrorist attack on an airline with the underwear bomber that turned out to be a plant in the terrorist ranks, confirmed the pattern.
The left ginned up civil unrest with the hyped and phony Trayvon Martin BS, then the underwear bomber was given the go ahead for the attack.
I believe that's the reason for this attack being planned the way it was.
They were trying to cover up with this attack that the left has been orchestrating the news/civil unrest for the attacks and want to make it appear as if the terrorist are planning the attacks based on civil unrest that is in the news or the terrorist themselves are orchestrating the news/civil unrest for the attack.
The movie was made by Pali operatives and posted to youtube by someone in Stanley. Stanley's hq is in Arlington. Same company's employees were charged with rooting around BHO's passport information, remember that one?
Produced by AQ, promoted by CIA, touted by both sides. So, what is going on?
Good catch. More recently the lesbian who carved hate messages onto her own skin... all fake - all done by her...blames white men.
Yep, that’s line of succession on Innocence of Muslims. Pretty interesting isn’t it? Someone with influence in (or over) the CIA sent the final cut to a Cairo cleric. Possibly even did the final editing and dubbing. It’s a setup.
Interesting? The families of those four dead might have another word for it.
If you have any ideas, I'd be glad to hear them.
Obama and Hillary Apologize for Free Speech on Pakistani TV (taxpayer-funded ads) Sept. 20, 2012
Which immediately resulted in this...
Pakistan: 17 killed in anti-Islam film protests Sept. 21, 2012
Now 0bama goes to the UN and re-inflames the Muslim world once again over the manufactured offense "Innocence of Muslims."
U.S. President Speaks to U.N. About YouTube Video
The excuse was failing at that point but they pushed it even further until it resulted in riots and killings in Pakistan. Just a way to bolster the notion that the film did cause the violence? Keep in mind that Hillary herself used the Cairo embassy Twitter account to apologize for the film the afternoon of the riots there. Before the Benghazi assault had occurred.
At this point, yes, extremely difficult.
Not enough evidence or dots connected at this point. It seems like a cover was being built to explain the outbreak of violence at the Cairo embassy and the consulate in Benghazi. The problem with that regarding Benghazi is the fact that numerous witnesses have confirmed that there were no crowds or rioters upset about the film. The attack there was clearly a planned military style assault. But it is clear that 0 & H did their best to use the film as an excuse for it all.
Yes, but the youtube video was in place for months. A copy was sent to the Egyptian cleric two days BEFORE 9/11. The film was used as a CATALYST. Later O & H tried to use it as cover.
The excuse was failing at that point but they pushed it even further until it resulted in riots and killings in Pakistan.
Right. They stupidly doubled down. Why? This is the crazy part.
Keep in mind that Hillary herself used the Cairo embassy Twitter account to apologize for the film the afternoon of the riots there. Before the Benghazi assault had occurred.
That is news to me. Are you sure about this?
A big question is who forwarded it to the cleric. Also, Nakoula is not the one who uploaded it in June.
Later O & H tried to use it as cover.
Three days later by the timeline you just established.
That is news to me. Are you sure about this?
I may have been wrong about that.
Hillary Doubled Down on Egypt 'Apology'Clinton's statements on the day's events, released through the State Department's website and Twitter feed, condemn "in the strongest possible terms" an attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya in Benghazi that left one American dead, but offer no condemnation of the attack on the U.S. embassy in Cairo.
Instead, Clinton reiterates an apology issued earlier today by the U.S. Embassy in Cairo--now deleted--which said: "We condemn the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims." (Note the time of that Twitter feed 7:54 PM Sep. 11, '12. I believe that is EDT which would be 1:54 AM Sep. 12 in Cairo and Benghazi.)
Inside the public relations disaster at the Cairo embassy
After the breach, as public criticism of the statement grew, the Cairo Embassy Twitter account continued to send out tweets defending it, some of which were later deleted. One deleted tweet, originally posted at 12:30 a.m. Cairo time, said, "This morning's condemnation (issued before protests began) still stands. As does condemnation of unjustified breach of the Embassy." (That would have been 12:30 AM Cairo time on Sep. 12.)
US Libyan consulate attack: Timeline of events
10pm: Attackers open fire at the consulate, which has a main building and a smaller annex.
11.20pm: A second attempt to retake the main building is successful. Fighting moves to the annex.
(snip)
Midnight: Fighting at the annex - reported to last about two hours - results in the deaths of two more Americans, later named by US authorities as former Navy Seals whose job was to protect the other staff.
1.15am: Mr Stevens arrives at a nearby hospital - it is not known who took him. A doctor there has told the BBC that he spent an hour trying to revive him, but that Mr Stevens died from smoke inhalation.
2.30am: Security forces regain control of the annex.
(That is all Benghazi time.)
So, depending on which account of when Hillary tweeted the apology, 12:30 AM or 1:54 AM, it occurred right about the time the ambassador reached the hospital and during the height of the fight at the annex. Shortly afterward the tweet was deleted.
Placemark.
Thanks, TE!!! <3
Happy to help.
Montagraph claims that the upload to youtube and the post to the Egyptian mullah originated at the Stanley company in Arlington.
I don't think he said who forwarded the video (or link to it) to the cleric. My memory may be failing me on that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.