To: TigersEye
I can't figure out what this is all about. Obviously the youtube posting was done in June with the idea to use it later for one purpose or another.
Interesting? The families of those four dead might have another word for it.
If you have any ideas, I'd be glad to hear them.
29 posted on
10/09/2012 3:03:23 PM PDT by
Former Proud Canadian
(Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
To: Former Proud Canadian
Proving any theory about why it was done is going to be hard to do. Not enough evidence or dots connected at this point. It seems like a cover was being built to explain the outbreak of violence at the Cairo embassy and the consulate in Benghazi. The problem with that regarding Benghazi is the fact that numerous witnesses have confirmed that there were no crowds or rioters upset about the film. The attack there was clearly a planned military style assault. But it is clear that 0 & H did their best to use the film as an excuse for it all.
Obama and Hillary Apologize for Free Speech on Pakistani TV (taxpayer-funded ads) Sept. 20, 2012
Which immediately resulted in this...
Pakistan: 17 killed in anti-Islam film protests Sept. 21, 2012
Now 0bama goes to the UN and re-inflames the Muslim world once again over the manufactured offense "Innocence of Muslims."
U.S. President Speaks to U.N. About YouTube Video
The excuse was failing at that point but they pushed it even further until it resulted in riots and killings in Pakistan. Just a way to bolster the notion that the film did cause the violence? Keep in mind that Hillary herself used the Cairo embassy Twitter account to apologize for the film the afternoon of the riots there. Before the Benghazi assault had occurred.
30 posted on
10/09/2012 3:29:56 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson