Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pew: Obama 51, Romney 43
Politico ^ | 9/19/12 | ALEXANDER BURNS

Posted on 09/19/2012 8:57:43 PM PDT by Qbert

The Pew Research Center gives Obama his biggest lead of the week, finding that he "holds a bigger September lead than the last three candidates who went on to win in November":

With the exception of jobs and the deficit, on which voter opinion is about evenly divided, Obama leads Romney on most key issues, notably healthcare, Medicare, and abortion.

And the survey, conducted amid an outbreak of violence in the Middle East and shortly after the killing of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, shows that Obama has a wide edge when it comes to foreign affairs and national security. Far more voters see Obama as a strong leader and as the candidate voters believe would use good judgment in a crisis. Voters also express more confidence in Obama than Romney to deal with foreign policy generally, as well as problems in the Middle East. …

Obama’s overall advantage – he leads 51% to 42% among registered voters – does not narrow significantly when looking only at those most likely to vote. Among 2,192 likely voters, Obama leads Romney, 51% to 43%.

So, in the last 24 hours we've seen a 5-point Obama lead from NBC/WSJ, a 1-point Obama lead from AP-GfK and this 8-point lead from Pew. While the top lines numbers vary from poll to poll, the consistent pattern is some edge for Obama on the overall ballot, plus a lead on most individual issues and a dead heat (or something like it) on the economy. If you consider the fundamental conditions of the 2012 cycle, the fact that Romney hasn't been able to establish a lead over Obama on economic issues is probably the most surprising stat of them all.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; obama; pew; riggedpolls; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last
To: Gilbo_3

... and put into context... oh thats right, they edited the video to make it look and sound worse.

“I won, get over it” - Obama


101 posted on 09/20/2012 7:19:59 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Impy; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; Sarah; Sarah Barracuda; dfwgator; SunkenCiv; GladesGuru; ...
...(inexplicably including POing Palestinians in with that,which would be a huge problem if the editorial board of the NY times were the only electors)”.

LOL!!!

Maybe not as inexplicable as you think. Due to the Boca Raton, FL location of the Romney fundraising event, it is reasonable to think that a significant percentage of his audience was Jewish. So Romney included in his talk his frank opinion that the Palestinians were never going to agree to peace with Israel.

This got his leftist detractors in the media unnerved when they saw and heard it in the Mother Jones video. So they demonstrated their true anti-Israel predilections by jumping down Romney's throat as payback.

102 posted on 09/20/2012 3:01:21 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Republicans have no party discipline.


103 posted on 09/24/2012 5:15:20 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Impy
RE :”Republicans have no party discipline.

Nor party unity. Its’ hard to summarize them all in one comment. I been mentally listing them.

One that comes to mind is that both Romney and McCain were forced to flip their past positions to win their primaries. But that leaves a problem, that they end up running without a set of core beliefs that they know how to defend.

So once again we end up with “It doesnt matter who Romney/McCain really is, he is better than Obama”. That is not the makings of a great campaign as we see again.

I like that one you replied to, I forgot I wrote it: ref cool comment#88

104 posted on 09/24/2012 7:00:59 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Impy; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; stephenjohnbanker
No worries

Polling data and analysis of voting patterns indicates that Romney is going to win most of the key swing states including the five surveyed by Purple Strategies just a few days ago.
How Mitt Romney is actually defeating Barack Obama in the presidential race examiner.com ^ | 9/24/12 | Dean Chambers

What is amazing is that so many of Romney's allies have been scolding him in public, but not one of Obamas has been saying anything critical of him for a while, yet according to this poll Romney wins big,

Then there are there are the Dems who are confident obama will win(at this moment anyway), and here we got panic and finger-pointing by the Romney supporters.

Maybe there is this tremendously huge iceberg just under the surface that is not visible.....

105 posted on 09/24/2012 7:15:05 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Impy; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3

” Maybe there is this tremendously huge iceberg just under the surface that is not visible..... “

It’s called jobs. The REAL unemployment rate is around 15%.

Former Obama supporters are defecting in droves. Oh, not the

ones on TV, the ones you meet at the supermarket. Ohio is

going for Romney, just because of jobs. Even some unions

are defecting there.


106 posted on 09/25/2012 8:06:06 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; Impy; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3
RE :”It’s called jobs. The REAL unemployment rate is around 15%.Former Obama supporters are defecting in droves. Oh, not the ones on TV, the ones you meet at the supermarket. Ohio is going for Romney, just because of jobs. Even some unions are defecting there.

wow, you are really optimist about this election.

107 posted on 09/25/2012 11:55:40 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; Impy; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3

I believe this election is going to be a lot less close than the DNCp is trying to convince us it’s going to be. Romney will win, and it won’t be close.

This is not going to be a Bush repeat. It will be closer to a Reagan repeat.


108 posted on 09/25/2012 12:01:17 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Imagine how bad these global protests would be, if Obama hadn't won us so many new friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker; Impy; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3
RE :”I believe this election is going to be a lot less close than the DNCp is trying to convince us it’s going to be. Romney will win, and it won’t be close.
This is not going to be a Bush repeat. It will be closer to a Reagan repeat

You too? Wow! That is optimism.

You two think Romney needs the debates?

109 posted on 09/25/2012 12:29:10 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I believe he does. And I do believe he could be harmed by them, if he’s not up to it. One thing is for sure. He could win 99 points and lose on 1, and the DNCp would call it a lopsided Obama victory.


110 posted on 09/25/2012 12:56:14 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Imagine how bad these global protests would be, if Obama hadn't won us so many new friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I believe he does. And I do believe he could be harmed by them, if he’s not up to it. One thing is for sure. He could win 99 points and lose on 1, and the DNCp would call it a lopsided Obama victory.


111 posted on 09/25/2012 1:00:17 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Imagine how bad these global protests would be, if Obama hadn't won us so many new friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; DoughtyOne

Oops, the dreaded double-whammy post.


112 posted on 09/25/2012 1:01:19 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Imagine how bad these global protests would be, if Obama hadn't won us so many new friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
wow, you are really optimist about this election.

There's no reason not to be.

Polls based on the 2008 turnout model -- some even more favorable to Democrats -- are obvious exercises in propaganda. They are expressly designed to demoralize anti-Obama forces.

They can be useful, however. One can adjust the turnout sample to reflect the 2004 election...or even the 2010 election. In either case, Romney emerges victorious -- by a healthy margin.

The reliable polls -- Rasmussen, e.g. -- take a middle ground on the turnout issue...and produce a dead heat.

All the polls nonetheless agree on two things:

1. Romney is winning big among the independents

2. There is a huge enthusiasm gulf between the two parties -- which favors the Republicans.

Consequently, a repeat of 2008 is simply not conceivable. And, if it turns into 2010 all over again, it's a landslide.

113 posted on 09/25/2012 1:14:07 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: securityman

You are, in the long run, correct. But you may not be correct this year. The reason I say that is Romney runs ahead of Obama with independents in almost every single poll no matter the D/R/I split. And usually he runs double digits ahead of Obama with independents. If he does that on election day he will win. But that will only delay the inevitable. My grandkids will be living in a socialist dump by the time they reach my age of 61.


114 posted on 09/25/2012 1:19:28 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
RE :”Oops, the dreaded double-whammy post.

Now come on, you say Romney will win in a landslide, but he needs the debates (???) but he can still be hurt by them.

If he will certainly win in a landslide then how can the other two be true?

Your sudden confidence in him winning came from a mixed drink that is wearing off? That happens sometimes :)

115 posted on 09/25/2012 1:48:28 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; DoughtyOne; Impy; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3

” wow, you are really optimist about this election. “

Cautiously optimistic. I hope Romney doesn’t flub the debates.

What is encouraging is that Obama is REALLY floundering around. His attacks on Romney are not working, and Obama keeps putting his foot in his mouth..

“bump in the road”

“eye candy”

He is acting like what he is, a spoiled child in arrested development. Meanwhile, the economy grows worse every week.


116 posted on 09/25/2012 3:34:52 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker; Impy; Gilbo_3

Rasmussen the pollster says that, looking deep in the polls lately, it appears that voters still disapprove of Obama, just not as much. That sounds crazy to me, but what do I know. Maybe he is right. We may have a dumber, more greedy electorate than in the past.

But polls, and the data in them, do change.

I think I will have a better feel after the debates.


117 posted on 09/25/2012 3:38:09 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; DoughtyOne; Impy; Gilbo_3
What is encouraging is that Obama is REALLY floundering around. His attacks on Romney are not working, and Obama keeps putting his foot in his mouth..

Does CNN actually show his foot in his mouth consistently? Or do they mention it in passing and then move on?

118 posted on 09/25/2012 3:43:33 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; sickoflibs; DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker; Impy; Gilbo_3

” I think I will have a better feel after the debates.”

I agree.


119 posted on 09/25/2012 3:48:36 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

More in passing, but people read about it.


120 posted on 09/25/2012 3:49:51 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson