Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Obama's response is to refuse to meet with Netanyahu...
1 posted on 09/16/2012 7:14:36 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Innovative

Obama needed to go raise funds and go on Letterman.


2 posted on 09/16/2012 7:16:08 AM PDT by elhombrelibre ("I'd rather be ruled by the Tea Party than the Democratic Party." Norman Podhoretz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

See also:

Iranian commander: Nothing will remain of Israel if it attacks

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4281974,00.html

Of course Iran said in the recent past that nothing will remain of Israel. PERIOD. Whether or not it attacks Iran...

“Iran has in the past made reference to the destruction of Israel but his comments at a Tehran news conference were unusually strongly worded and detailed. “


3 posted on 09/16/2012 7:17:56 AM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

If Romney is elected and it happens on his watch, the democRATS can blame him.


4 posted on 09/16/2012 7:18:57 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Another result of president obungler’s policies.


5 posted on 09/16/2012 7:21:27 AM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

For one or another reason I’m sure Iran won’t get a bomb. Netanyahu is exhausting this hot air for domestic consumption. Alliance with America is vital for Israel’s population to feel secure but it is a bit broken right now thanks to Obama&Hitlery. Bibi is beating a drum to show he looks mean without US support. I think it is about his career.


6 posted on 09/16/2012 7:25:48 AM PDT by cunning_fish (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

UK Telegraph said they are going to meet, either this weekend on during the week.

Also, I am sick and tired and hearing about various timelines for Iran. It was 2 years for something like 10 years, now it is 6-7 months to be on the brink, whatever that means. I just hope Israel knows, as our intelligence has not been too good in that of part of the world.


7 posted on 09/16/2012 7:26:12 AM PDT by PghBaldy (I am sick of Obama's and Hillary's apologies to muslims, especially after 11 September 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

So if he believes this, what’s the urgency about attacking Iran prior to elections? What does he lose by waiting to see if Romney will help out? Romney couldn’t possibly be worse than Obama (at least he presumably wouldn’t leak plans of such an attack even if he were unwiling to support it.


8 posted on 09/16/2012 7:33:45 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Light them up Bibi!

Continue to be the leader and savior of the western world!


9 posted on 09/16/2012 7:33:54 AM PDT by himno hero (hadnuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

This was my prediction given in an academic paper written for an predictive analysis intelligence course I took a few years back: “Accordingly, within the time frame of 2011-2015, whether following Israel’s policy of nuclear opacity, confirmed by an actual overt test, or via a public/international announcement, Iran will conceivably acquire nuclear weapons capability.”

Yeah, if I can figure it out, this idiot-ridden administration and its intelligence apparatus’ can figure it out. =.=


10 posted on 09/16/2012 7:34:00 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

That can’t be true. For the last two years we have been told that Iran is at least two years away from.....oh wait...


13 posted on 09/16/2012 8:04:29 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I see bombing in Iran’s near future before the election is over.


15 posted on 09/16/2012 8:09:55 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Did anyone see the interview? I'm curious if they discussed the "he said, they said" controversy.

The White House says that Netanyahu never requested a meeting with Obama, and the kneepad media is taking them at their word.

What does Netanyahu say? Did he request a meeting, or not?

21 posted on 09/16/2012 9:02:36 AM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Iran can legally refine to the 19.75% red line per the Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1970, ratified by the US and legally binding by us. Israel has never agreed to the NPT.

Iran has produced 189.4 kg of 19.75% enriched uranium as of August 2012 and is continuing to produce 12 kg/month. It is using this enrichment to create fuel plates and rods for electrical power generation.

If Iran wants weapons grade 90% it can easily do so at any time in a room the size of double car garage using the power needed by a refrigerator. Israel and ourselves will know if that happens.

The Fordow enrichment plant entrance is under 300 feet of bedrock. In one day, Iran could take enough 19.75% and scatter it to at least 10 locations that have enrichment cascades and turn it into 90% in a month.

Or they could give it to Venezuela, Burma, N Korea, Cuba, Syria, Iraq, yes I said Iraq and any other of the 190 countries that signed the NPT.

There is literally nothing we or Israel can do to stop Iran. Bombing only hardens them and delays the guaranteed inevitable weaponization.

Ask yourselves this: What if the attack doesn’t work? We and Israel would be laughed at and many countries previously named would follow Iran’s lead and buy uranium cascades from them.

The embargo has shut down about 10% of Iran’s economy and will increase that effect.

Iran will stop their nuclear weapons program forever only when the people of Iran choose to stop it. Attacking them only makes the problem worse.


22 posted on 09/16/2012 9:43:25 AM PDT by gandalftb (The art of diplomacy says "nice doggie", until you find a bigger rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Iran can legally refine to the 19.75% red line per the Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1970, ratified by the US and legally binding by us. Israel has never agreed to the NPT.

Iran has produced 189.4 kg of 19.75% enriched uranium as of August 2012 and is continuing to produce 12 kg/month. It is using this enrichment to create fuel plates and rods for electrical power generation.

If Iran wants weapons grade 90% it can easily do so at any time in a room the size of double car garage using the power needed by a refrigerator. Israel and ourselves will know if that happens.

The Fordow enrichment plant entrance is under 300 feet of bedrock. In one day, Iran could take enough 19.75% and scatter it to at least 10 locations that have enrichment cascades and turn it into 90% in a month.

Or they could give it to Venezuela, Burma, N Korea, Cuba, Syria, Iraq, yes I said Iraq and any other of the 190 countries that signed the NPT.

There is literally nothing we or Israel can do to stop Iran. Bombing only hardens them and delays the guaranteed inevitable weaponization.

Ask yourselves this: What if the attack doesn’t work? We and Israel would be laughed at and many countries previously named would follow Iran’s lead and buy uranium cascades from them.

The embargo has shut down about 10% of Iran’s economy and will increase that effect.

Iran will stop their nuclear weapons program forever only when the people of Iran choose to stop it. Attacking them only makes the problem worse.


23 posted on 09/16/2012 9:43:56 AM PDT by gandalftb (The art of diplomacy says "nice doggie", until you find a bigger rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative; elhombrelibre; unixfox; old curmudgeon; cunning_fish; PghBaldy; DrC; himno hero; ...
Obama's response is to refuse to meet with Netanyahu...

On the lighter brighter side, he IS going on Letterman...

Consider this:

Iran sets up a meeting with Obama 6 months from now... at the UN or some such public place - TV cameras are present...

Five nukes explode over Israel.

An Iranian (maybe Ahmadinejad ) turns to the President and says, "We have nukes positioned in the United States - one in Washington DC, one in New York City, one in Chicago and others spread among your other cities."

Then with a telling arrogance he says, "Everyone in Israel is dead - there's nothing to fight over - the world can have peace now. The Jews are dead. There's no reason millions of American citizens must die. Those deaths won't bring Israel back..."

"Millions of Americans will die if you move against me - you must hear me out", he says. There's nervous laughter in the room. Obama says he needs more time. His SS agents move in to arrest Ahmadinejad.

A stolen suitcase nuke is exploded over MacDill AFB in Tampa.

Ahmadinejad tells the President to check with MacDill - that MacDill has been destroyed.

Panic sets in... The President of the United States is told to surrender or other American cities will be destroyed - one every 10 minutes... He also demands the United States disarm - his 'friends' - the Russians - will help with that process. Hesitation - and 2 more cities with CENTCOM centers are destroyed.

Obama is President - what do YOU think he'll do?

That's why we stand with Israel. We're in this with them - have no doubt about that... if they go down, we go down with them....

27 posted on 09/16/2012 9:57:01 AM PDT by GOPJ (first they came for those clinging to their guns and religion, and I did not speak out....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Sounds crazy, but the world is desperately waiting for SOMEONE to show some balls against the Islamists. God knows America hasn’t got any. God Bless Netanyahu. I’ll take a front row center seat when the bombing begins. Bye Bye Ahmadinejad.


38 posted on 09/16/2012 11:10:09 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

6-7 months?

Every few weeks for the past few years someone comes up with an estimate of just a few month more - it’s like crying wolf.

Here’s the deal - didn’t someone say the Iraq’s weapons were shipped to Syria before we invaded? If true, Syria has nukes now!

Going after Iran for possibly building nukes is a fools game - at the end of the day (when it happens) it will cost each of us thousands of dollars (fuel costs) and very possibly result in the destruction of Israel, Iran and several other countries. In fact, the end of the world may be at hand.


39 posted on 09/16/2012 11:23:55 AM PDT by unique1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Maybe soon. Or maybe after blooms have fallen but before fruit has ripened. We’ll see. But Iranian leaders are determined to use brutal methods to stir things up. If they build nukes, they’ll propagate technologies and tools to other countries and launch them. Those kooks want casualties on all sides, because they want to inflame their like-minded comrades everywhere to hurt us.


49 posted on 09/16/2012 4:20:25 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson