The wicked freely strut about when what is vile is honored among men.
Psalms 12:8
I think the NYT reporters and writers should read Leviticus 18:22.
What percentage of people are gay in this country? Why do Democrats think it is cool to talk about the gay community all the time? Is the media full of gays too?
OK......so....
Oh, yeah, he did slip up twice ~ wanted forced adoptions of straight chillun' to flamboyant gays, and he wanted homosexual activists to become scoutmasters.
Otherwise, pretty quiet ~ no big thing ~ dude's probably going to get busted for some of this stuff some day, but pretty quiet at the moment.
Then there's the other guy. He's gay too.
Dear Excluded,
You do realize that convention delegates were chosen months ago by local and state conventions all across the country right? You do realize that even a small space would be reserved for ... a REPUBLICAN, right?
The wicked freely strut about when what is vile is honored among men.
Psalms 12:8
.
I count the homosexual population as being one of the most intransigent segment of the voting population. But they’re only two or three percent of the voters. And even given the so-called anti-gay agenda of the Republicans, they still get about one third of the homosexual vote. That means to pander to the homosexual lobby would be to try and placate about one or two percent of the population. And that assumes all homosexuals vote which they don’t. Pandering would lose more votes for the Pubbies than they would gain. So what’s the point in pandering?
Not pandering to perversion is good with me
A culture that embraces decadence cannot prosper.
And don't let the door hit you on the butt on your way out.
If you can't support Romney because it's the right thing to do for the country rather than your own little (pervert) constituent group, then to hell with ya.
Morality is a figment of their imagination....something that doesn't exist...a world of "no conscience".
Kill babies, teach the gay life as being proper....disgusting!!
Pander: A go between in a sexual intrigue: Pimp.
Webster’s New World Dictionary.
A definition of the NYT which panders to gays: PIMP
so we shoudl give special rights and pander to a small % of people who like feces sex or women pretend to be a guy.
not a chance.
All of us say it loud and often to people,
Marriage is between one man and one woman, family is a mother and a father.
NY City and the north east is not America something which those elitst types up there seem to forget
Isn’t it enough that they nominated a candidate who’s pandered to gays for most of his political career?
And probably 90% of that 2% would never vote Republican and even less likely conservative Republican.
Right and please point out to me the Pro-life, anti-gay Marriage, pro defense, small Government people who will be invited to speak at the “open minded, tolerant” Democrat convention?
Frank Rich, former theater and film critic, now political pundit obsessed with injecting race and class envy into everything.
What's wrong, the throngs of brainwashed kids coming out of journalism school no longer know how to write? Why does the Times keep promoting washed up critics?