Replies

It's pretty funny, but of the five lines over those two portraits, the ones for the distance between the lips, the bottom of the nose, and the eyes match almost exactly. The one on top of the head is irrelevant because of differences that can occur in hair depth on top of the head. The only space that differs is that for the distance between the middle of the lips and the chin and that can vary depending on whether the teeth are touching (jaws clenched) or if the lower jaw is slightly relaxed but with the mouth closed. The way the photo was set up was patently an effort to make them look different. If whoever did it were honest, he would simply have lowered the SAD photo to demonstrate that distances between the central facial features were basically identical. If the SAD photo is lowered to place the line running across the middle of the left woman's eyes across SAD's eyes, then the lines for the nose and the mouth will be in the same position as they are in the woman on the left. Obviously the two women are different women. But also obviously the woman on the left is not the same woman as the one in the photo of the woman on the floor farther up in the thread, similarity of earrings notwithstanding. This photo is typical of those seen in many similar threads purporting to show "alterations" and photoshopping--differences or similarities are minimized or overemphasized to support whatever point the poster is trying to make. To date most of the photographic "analysis" I've seen has just been classic examples of overreaching.

You just haven’t bothered to watch the video I posted the link to from Gilbert’s film in which he shows The Model in numerous poses in numerous locations wearing different clothes - and all the way through she’s the same girl, she had a long career and of course she doesn’t always look the same, she started to wear more make-up and gained weight. Gilbert obtained the images from a website and from magazines, the photographs were taken over a period of time.

Tell me, do your own photographs show you looking the same when you were a teen and when you were in your early twenties? If they don’t, then neither does The Model. If two girls with a superficial resemblance are so essential to attempting to identify an old black man and a white teenager as parents of zero, how desperate are they?

Did you read through the thread or just jump on the side-by side-image of the Model and Stanley Ann Dunham and throw in your two cents...because that’s really all your analysis is worth. You’ve managed to make three women out of two.

VIDEO LINK CLICK HERE

Hate to break it to you, but if the model isn't Stanley Ann Dunham when she's wearing lots of make-up and she's a few years older, then she isn't Stanley Ann Dunham when she's somewhat younger either.

The differences in appearance between the model and SAD have been taken apart in great detail on other threads. I don’t know if you’ve taken the time to read and look at those threads. What bothers me is your accusation of dishonesty. That reeks. If you think the comparison isn’t valid, than come up with something better.

If you had looked at other threads with more photos for comparison, you would have seen that there are several facial structures and proportions that are notably different in the two people.

Your coming onto the thread to make a very nasty accusation of dishonesty makes me really wonder about your motivation.