Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aruanan; PhilDragoo; Fred Nerks

The differences in appearance between the model and SAD have been taken apart in great detail on other threads. I don’t know if you’ve taken the time to read and look at those threads. What bothers me is your accusation of dishonesty. That reeks. If you think the comparison isn’t valid, than come up with something better.

If you had looked at other threads with more photos for comparison, you would have seen that there are several facial structures and proportions that are notably different in the two people.

Your coming onto the thread to make a very nasty accusation of dishonesty makes me really wonder about your motivation.


147 posted on 08/26/2012 3:30:16 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
I understand your reaction, but I wonder if it really matters? Who cares? No one seems to be able to see behind the curtain. From the time the images first appeared, and we traced them to free-vintage-porn com it was patently obvious that the girl wasn't Stanley Ann Dunham, because although the serial number was still shown on one of the images, the actual images had been removed from the website, which had an entire section devoted to nothing but photographs of hundreds of women wearing nothing but stockings, high heeled shoes and large earrings.

It looked like a section produced on a production line, there were numerous different women and girls all presented in the same fashion, some were in groups, many on their own, the locations and backgrounds were various.

The girl originally identified as Stanley Ann Dunham, who did superficially resemble her, was a model who appears again and again throughout the numerous magazines Gilbert has collected. Images that he presents, not as Stanley Ann Dunham in the video, but as ANN DUNHAM.

So what is his accusation? Is it that ANN DUNHAM had a relationship with the elderly Frank Marshall Davis in Hawaii? If so, and even if he makes it clear that his theory is Ann Dunham was the mother of zero, who can hold his feet to the fire over it? All he is really insinuating is that ANN OBAMA and Stanley Ann Dunham were the same person.

HE HASN'T SAID THAT STANLEY ANN DUNHAM HAD A SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS.

In reality, he's no different to Neil Abercrombie, who knows very well that he never saw Stanley Ann Dunham in Hawaii with the kenyan.

That's why Neil Abercrombie always calls the woman he saw with the kenyan ANN. That's a safe bet for Neil, just as it is for Gilbert. They both know there was an entry in the Honolulu Polk for ANN S OBAMA. A resident student. That this person wasn't Stanley Ann Dunham apparently has yet to sink in.

And until that happens, all the discussions about who the model is, are a waste of time I guess. Stanley Ann Dunham wasn't in Hawaii. But ANN OBAMA was.

And ALL of the exotic images from the free vintage porn website and the magazines featured in the Gilbert video, (link provided twice) ARE NEITHER ANN NOR STANLEY ANN.

148 posted on 08/26/2012 4:10:43 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson