Dump the embarrassment for Sarah Steelman!
Posted on 08/20/2012 7:06:28 AM PDT by Kaslin
Until yesterday, Todd Akin had a comfortable polling lead in Missouri over incumbent Senator Claire McCaskill in what had been the most vulnerable seat for Democrats this cycle. Suddenly, one has to ask whether Akin has a, er, legitimate chance of beating McCaskill, or even a legitimate chance of avoiding a Torricelli maneuver:
Todd Akin on Rape and Abortion, The Jaco Report, 8/19/2012
In the clip, Charles Jaco, of St. Louis Fox affiliate KTVI’s “Jaco Report,” asks Akin whether he thinks abortions ought to permissible in a situation where a woman is raped. While explaining his position, Akin claimed that pregnancy only rarely results from “legitimate rape.”
“Well you know, people always want to make it as one of those things where how do you slice this particularly tough, sort of ethical question,” he replied. “It seems to me first of all, from what I understand from doctors — that’s really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down. But, let’s assume that maybe that didn’t work, or something. I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child.”
Good grief. First, pregnancy from rape isn’t all that uncommon, as Twitchy discovered with just a little research; it’s around 5%. At least one researcher has found that conception rates for rape actually exceeds that of single instances of consensual sex. Second, what in Akin’s mind constitutes legitimate rape? Was he trying to distinguish between forcible rape and statutory rape? If so, that’s a pretty fine distinction, and one that’s really nonsensical even in the argument Akin was trying to make. And if he wanted to suggest that some women would lie about being raped in order to secure an abortion, then he’s really setting up an argument that any woman who is pregnant couldn’t really have been raped … which as noted above is simply not the case.
Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan distanced themselves from Akin’s argument at light speed:
A spokeswoman for Mitt Romney wrote late Sunday that the presumptive GOP presidential nominee and his running mate, U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, did not share Rep. Todd Akin’s sentiments on rape.
“Governor Romney and Congressman Ryan disagree with Mr. Akin’s statement, and a Romney-Ryan administration would not oppose abortion in instances of rape,” Romney campaign spokeswoman Amanda Henneberg wrote.
Even Akin himself repudiated his earlier remarks:
“As a member of Congress, I believe that working to protect the most vulnerable in our society is one of my most important responsibilities, and that includes protecting both the unborn and victims of sexual assault. In reviewing my off-the-cuff remarks, it’s clear that I misspoke in this interview and it does not reflect the deep empathy I hold for the thousands of women who are raped and abused every year. Those who perpetrate these crimes are the lowest of the low in our society and their victims will have no stronger advocate in the Senate to help ensure they have the justice they deserve.
“I recognize that abortion, and particularly in the case of rape, is a very emotionally charged issue. But I believe deeply in the protection of all life and I do not believe that harming another innocent victim is the right course of action. I also recognize that there are those who, like my opponent, support abortion and I understand I may not have their support in this election.
“But I also believe that this election is about a wide-range of very important issues, starting with the economy and the type of country we will be leaving our children and grandchildren. We’ve had 42 straight months of unacceptably high unemployment, trillion dollar deficits, and Democratic leaders in Washington who are focused on growing government, instead of jobs. That is my primary focus in this campaign and while there are those who want to distract from that, knowing they cannot defend the Democrats’ failed economic record of the last four years, that will continue to be my focus in the months ahead.”
“Those who want to distract from that” got a big boost from Akin himself.
Can Republicans replace Akin, if they so choose? Apparently they can — but the deadline is tomorrow. Of course, deadlines didn’t matter when Robert Torricelli became a political pariah in New Jersey, but there are a couple of differences. First, it involved actual corruption, not a case of foot-in-mouth disease, and second, Torricelli was a Democrat. If Republicans want Akin off the ticket, they’d have to act quickly, which means it won’t happen at all.
That means that Missouri will probably see a lot of debate over “legitimate,” and Republicans had better hope that Akin can legitimately change the subject soon.
Update: Chuck Todd hints that there may be more time than we think if Akin withdraws:
There is a SECOND deadline for Akin to withdraw, 9/25, but it’s complicated. Will explain on
@dailyrundown.— Chuck Todd (@chucktodd) August 20, 2012
Well, the whole thing’s getting pretty complicated now, isn’t it?
Update II: Sarah Steelman, one of two challengers against Akin in the primary and Sarah Palin’s endorsed choice, blasted Akin this morning on Twitter:
Todd Akin’s remarks about “legitimate rape” were inexcusable, insulting and embarrassing to the GOP.
#mosen— Sarah Steelman (@sarah_steelman) August 20, 2012
On the other hand, poll analyst Sean Trende reminds us that politicians who say stupid things often don’t pay as much of a price as we’d think:
Perspective on Akin: After basically dropping an n-bomb, in a horrible R year, George Allen very nearly won his Senate race.
— Sean Trende (@SeanTrende) August 20, 2012
Perspective on Akin: After lying about going to Vietnam, in a terrible Dem year, R Blumenthal handily won his Senate race.
— Sean Trende (@SeanTrende) August 20, 2012
Persp on Akin:After saying “rape is like bad weather: If it’s inevitable, just relax and enjoy it,” Williams ~won 90 TX Gov. race
— Sean Trende (@SeanTrende) August 20, 2012
These things matter.But they aren’t necessarily the game changers pundits make them out to be.
— Sean Trende (@SeanTrende) August 20, 2012
I’m not sure that this is a comforting thought.
People aren’t outraged by his saying that pregnancies due to rape are rare.
They’re outraged by him saying that if a woman is “legitimately” raped her body will prevent her from getting pregnant (with the obvious implication that if you get pregnant from a rape, you’re probably lying about being raped).
And I think Akin meant everything he said.
Akin was right. Steelman is a RINO.
Get Steelman or one of the others in there, and all of this goes away.
Is there a way to dump him or are we stuck with this moronic choice of the good ole boys?
Pretty much the same can be said for anyone in Washington, they only choose to be a Republican or Democrat, based on which makes it easier for them to be elected, then they play their role.
No... not only stupid, but monumentally stupid. He literally handed that election, and probably control of the Senate, to the dems.
Any Repub who hasn't yet understood the huge media disadvantage that party faces doesn't belong on any ticket. This gaffe was destructive beyond repair. I am hoping and praying the RNC boots this idiot in short order.
Or Whoopi Goldberg defending Roman Polanski.
Can the Missouri GOP force him out and select another candidate? Or is the only choice for him to voluntarily step down?
Dump the embarrassment for Sarah Steelman!
I can think of one:
Sarah Steelman still looks good to me, and politically too...
The RNC needs to make amends with Palin for not inviting her to speak at the convention. Maybe replacing Akin with the candidate she supported would be a start?...
Um, no, he didn't, HE LOST. He outspent Richards 2 x 1 and blew an 11 point lead ....
ANOTHER Republican pulling defeat from the jaws of victory.
They never learn.
This is the kind of thing that happens when they go off-script.
Paging Sarah Steelman...
Please respond to a clean-up in the GOP-e Dept...
I wouldn’t jump on the Steelman bandwagon so quickly. I would think if Aiken drops out it would go the second place candidate, which would be Brunner, IIRC. If it’s strictly a party pick then, yes, it might be Steelman. I’ve heard she’s been a thorn in the party’s side so not sure she would be a sure thing either.
Does this mean he’s now qualified to be a Dem VP???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.