[Republican Wildcat]

Regardless of whether or not Mr. Perkins' comments were valid, there's so much hypocrisy in this it is mind blowing given the rhetoric of this organization and other liberals in the past. Of course the media and left wing pundits' silence over this is defining - there is a far greater connection in direct attacks against this organization vs. Sarah Palin merely advocating for the victory of certain candidates in elections over others somehow equating to inspiring people (for reasons we later know had nothing to do with elections) to commit murder. In this case the perp has admitted to being influenced by the left wing rhetoric attacking this organization. Ultimately, they certainly are not responsible for the individual choice of this gunman, but the hypocrisy of these organizations and leftists is extraordinary as there is an actual claimed connection to the negative rhetoric directed toward this organization vs. no evidence at all of a connection to other incidents that get blamed on conservatives as part of the news cycle.

[Steely Tom]

“That’s outrageous!” is not a denial.

[Bernard Marx]

Mark Potok is a Left Wing terrorist and the SPLC is a terrorist organization-for-profit. Like all Marxists Potok untruthfully accuses the opposition of doing exactly what he and his group are in reality doing.

The lies spread by the SPLC are horrendous. Find out what Pamela Geller thinks of Potok and his rabid organization here:

SPLC Hate

Here's Alex Jones's view: SPLC

One of the best take-downs of the SPLC is here:

SPLC Fundraising Racket

[nickcarraway]

Sounds like they agree with John Boehner.

[AwesomePossum]

Shoe on other foot owie..........

8:}

[piasa]

For a group that’s supposed to be against violence the SPLC’s one time president Bond didn’t seem to have a problem with the rioting at the democrat convention in 1968 Chicago.

[SuziQ]

"The FRC and its allies on the religious right are saying, in effect, that offering legitimate and fact-based criticism in a democratic society is tantamount to suggesting that the objects of criticism should be the targets of criminal violence."

SO how does it feel when YOU are the subject of that 'hater' accusation, SPLC?

[Gene Eric]

>> For more than 40 years, the SPLC has battled against political extremism and political violence.

But is never short on the incendiary rhetoric that might compel the kind of extremism it claims to denounce.

You’re not the virtuous objector you pretend to be, Potok.

[Jabba the Nutt]

Hmmm, the SPLC labels the Family Research Council a hate group. Then they define this smear as a "offering legitimate and fact-based criticism in a democratic society is tantamount to suggesting that the objects of criticism should be the targets of criminal violence."

Friedrich von Hayek in his "Road to Serfdom" identifies a signature of totalitarism as changing the meaning of words. Smear = legitimate criticism. This says more about the SPLC than it does the FRC.

[SECURE AMERICA]

When you label a group that supports marriage and morality as a hate group to appease your homosexual friends then you are responsible for the hatred towards them that follows..

[Caipirabob]

SUE THE SPLC INTO THE GROUND!

[expat2]

They did contribute to an ugly environment which ‘gave license’, but the homosexual groups were the worst offenders.

[devolve]

-

MORRIS DEES - SPLC attorney/official:

Morris Dees — Child Molester, Pervert, and Liar?

http://www.zianet.com/web/dees1.htm

-

[TBP]

FRC is exactly right about SPLC. SPLC is a racist hate group.

[TBP]

Liberalism created the climate in which this guy could do what he did. They need a certain level of violence to advance their ends.

[TBP]

Hmmm...

Fast and Furious didn’t get it done, neither did Aurora or the Sikh Temple. Maybe if we goes after some of them moron rightwing peoples that’ll do the trick.

[Rome2000]

We have argued consistently that violence is no answer to problems in a democratic society

Tell that to the sons of the FOUNDERS.

[GOPJ]

bttt