Posted on 08/08/2012 5:35:12 AM PDT by IbJensen
Nice to finally see that being admitted, freely and openly.
Authoritarian types?
I have not asked him or anyone to stop posting any point of view. Diogenese has used the same photos and illustrations in hundreds of posts for many months.
I am simply bored seeing them over and over and over. It’s like seeing spam at this point.
Why not some new and different photos and phrases in his attacks on Romney? It was just a request. That’s all I’m saying.
(If Obama takes it; he will have his own MO to take them out; or just down. . .)
Well; you may be right; in which case; 'managed' would be preferable; IMHO.
That said; however; believe the 'point of power' is always in the present; and that at any time; if we have in store the 'will' to resist and the will to reclaim and restore; and focus determinedly; then do believe we can pull out a 'save' for America.
More than pathetic; that we have no one in 'prime time' recreating the vision needed. And those; like Allen West, Marco Rubio and a few; including Sarah Palin and yes, Newt; and a few more; are all but pushed to the curb; in favor of what appears to be the vision impaired, 'flat line' of Republican leadership.
Yes in fact, it is.
Im voting for the person most likely to win against Obama.
Kinda like McCain, eh? Why in the hell would you think that Romney can beat the incumbent liberal when they are fighting over the same base of voters?
This is about the destruction of the U.S. for generations. Kids nowadays not willing to take a risk because of the policies set out by this administration. People going bankrupt and losing hope. Terrible crimes and shootings because we are becoming a nation without morals.... look around.
So... How does voting for Romney fix all that? Especially if he isn't standing upon the morals you claim to want to preserve? Why? Because he'll make the trains run on time?
Your logic is so flawed as to be rejected. Fear is clouding your judgement. You dont fix this country by replacing one liberal/marxist/socialist/globalist with another.
“A non vote for Romney does not increase the votes for Obama or who ever”
The fact is that a non vote for Romney does in fact increase the chance that Obama will be re-elected.
And really that is what this argument is about - do you want to increase the odds that Obama will be re-elected or not ?
From your attitude to date you are fine with increasing the odds that Obama will be re-elected.... just live with it.
“Your logic is so flawed as to be rejected. Fear is clouding your judgement. You dont fix this country by replacing one liberal/marxist/socialist/globalist with another”
Really - how long have you been campaigning for Obama ?
“Why in the hell would you think that Romney can beat the incumbent liberal....”
Romney has never been president so you don’t know what kind of president he will be.... BUT... you do know what Obama is. So I think it is your fear of the unknown that is clouding your judgement.
My comments are based on what kind of president Obama is and obviously will be, fact, Your fear is based on perception.
You are increasing the odds that Obama will win a second term.... I hope your guy loses.
Somehow, I don’t believe that the people who flooded the Chick-Fil-A last week are going to be staying home on Election night to help Obama get re-elected.
“We can say based on your posting that you want a liberal as president, I do not.”
Or put another way I don’t want Obama at all - your ok with him if you don’t get “your guy”.
Kinda makes more sense and I don’t have to call you names...
He is milder mannered.
I am not campaigning for Obama. Your typically Republican binary assumptions are not true.
Romney has never been president so you dont know what kind of president he will be.... BUT... you do know what Obama is.
LOL! No, he hasn't been president, but he has been a governor, which should be a pretty good indicator - And his 'accomplishments' as governor are not far removed from where Obama is. You seem to forget that Conservatives put far more weight upon a candidate's record, because the record is more honest than a stump speech ever will be.
So I think it is your fear of the unknown that is clouding your judgement.
I see nothing 'unknown' in Romney whatsoever. His record predicts his future actions.
My comments are based on what kind of president Obama is and obviously will be, fact, Your fear is based on perception.
The facts of Obama are precisely the same as the facts of Romney: Their records, neither of which is even vaguely Conservative in any way. Both are globalists. Both are socialist/marxist. I don't vote for liberals. Period. Again, this country will not be fixed by replacing one liberal/globalist/socialist/communist with another. Even if he does have a magic rhinestone 'R' by his name.
You are increasing the odds that Obama will win a second term....
Only if one assumes that Romney can win. Like with McCain, I doubt that very much. Just the matter of the Christian Right is enough to cast doubt upon any win at all - He will not win without them... And I will comfortably predict they will not be 'with him'.
I hope your guy loses.
I don't have a 'guy'. I will vote for Hoefling or maybe Goode, if they make the Montana ballot, but there is no way in hell I will be voting for either Obama or Romney. Their pro-choice positions ALONE insure that, among many other things...
That depends a lot on who those Chick-Fil-A folks were - They are being hawked as free speech proponents and civil libertarians... And while I do not deny that element, I believe those folks were by and large the vast Christian Right. I do not believe that Christians will be voting for pro-choice, pro-gay candidates any time soon.
“Ive been here at FreeRepublic for a very long time, and I thought I understood how we think here, our ideals, how we feel about America. If we dont excise the cancer in the WH, we wont have America as we once knew her. Not voting for Mitt Romeny is the same as voting for the lying Kenyan usurper who squats in OUR White House.”
Well, Jim Robinson had the following to say on July 30th...tell him he is “voting for” Obama by not voting for Romney:
“Well, Im not staying home, but Im not voting for no damned abortionist/homosexualist statist either. I will not cast a vote for the chief architect of ObamaCare (Mitt Romney)!! Ill be voting straight conservative!!”
“Thats something in his favor and something he can say he shares with Ronald Reagan.”
Oh, but Ronald Reagan didn’t take orders from the East Coast Country Club GOP Establishment or from Cult Leaders in Salt Lake City. Romney answers to both!
“You’re more worried about Romney than Obama. That’s wonderful!!!”
Actually, he is right on the mark. Obama has the potential to destroy the country. Romney has the potential to destroy the country and conservatism.
I tried that with McCain, but the stench still lingers to this day - every time that anti-American communist scumbag opens his mouth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.