The gay activists don’t want civil unions, and they really don’t want “marriage”.
They’re not PO’d over Cathy’s opposition to gay “marriage”, because he didn’t express any opposition, just support of biblical marriage, and that’s what set them off.
They are mad about support for biblical marriage.
I don’t think your off base there. My emphasis has been different.
It’s my take that there is a movement within, that really wants to get enough power to undo the taboo against adult child sex.
That’s why you see this rabid mad-dog vicious attack against anyone who says anything remotely suggesting that homosexuality might not be proper. In this instance, it involved homosexual’s desires for equal footing on marriage.
They intend to make it so difficult for anyone to speak truth, that they can do whatever they want.
That said, I honestly do agree with you that the CEO DID NOT trash homosexual marriage. None the less, it’s very important to this group to make it completely impossible to voice objection to their goals, and I would submit, no matter what those goals are.
Take a look at the movement to teach very young children that that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality, even going so far as to try to break the parent/child bond of trust to achieve it, if it’s deemed necessary. And they have deemed it so.
It took this community a very long time to get up the courage to break support for NAMBLA. Publicly they have, but I remain unconvinced that the group as a hole sees much wrong with NAMBLA. That’s a personal opinion, I’ll grant you, but with the push into our very young children’s schools and pre-schools, it rather evident that children are not out of bounds for them.
They are very definitely in-bounds, and you don’t hear a single homosexual taking objection. Speaks volumes for me.