1 posted on
07/21/2012 8:40:09 PM PDT by
dennisw
To: dennisw
In general the scientists found a slow cooling of 0.6C over 2,000 years,
2 posted on
07/21/2012 8:40:58 PM PDT by
dennisw
To: dennisw
So can we call all those trees an “inconvenient growth”?
4 posted on
07/21/2012 8:44:11 PM PDT by
samtheman
(Obama. Mugabe. Chavez. (Obamugavez))
To: dennisw
Youve heard of their bread-and-circuses? This was a tree-ring circus.
5 posted on
07/21/2012 8:47:39 PM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
(If Bill Ayers had a son, he'd look like James Holmes.)
To: dennisw
This just can’t be...Al Gore said so!
6 posted on
07/21/2012 8:48:17 PM PDT by
South40
("Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance." Hussein Obama, Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009)
To: dennisw
In general the scientists found a slow cooling of 0.6C over 2,000 years, which they attributed to changes in the Earths orbit which took it further away from the Sun. Is this creep of earth's orbit away from the sun still going on now?
8 posted on
07/21/2012 8:52:06 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
To: dennisw
German researchers used data from tree rings a key indicator of past climate
Live by the tree ring, die by the tree ring. Have you ever seen a more self confident idiot? Not to mention the millions of tax dollars Michael Mann has scammed for his manipulated research. German scientists are smarter than this smug little turd
AngloSphere scientists are behind 90% of global warming "research" and agit-prop.
10 posted on
07/21/2012 9:04:55 PM PDT by
dennisw
To: dennisw
The really sad thing about everything related to AGW, is that most of this was known decades ago.
Written records alone bear witness to the climate at those times.
All of this money wasted on reestablishing what is already known.
11 posted on
07/21/2012 9:05:29 PM PDT by
Puckster
To: dennisw
Of course it was warmer in Roman times.
The Romans were well known to be polluters of the environment.
They used wood to heat their homes and cook their food.
A huge carbon footprint.
15 posted on
07/21/2012 9:18:19 PM PDT by
garjog
To: dennisw
Yeah but there’s no money of power to be had in pointing this out.
19 posted on
07/21/2012 9:33:56 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(We must get down on our knees each day and thank God that McCain/Palin didn't win in '08. Right?)
To: steelyourfaith
21 posted on
07/21/2012 10:40:26 PM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: dennisw
Well, this explains a lot about why the Romans built the Appian Way - they needed a paved road for their SUVs!!
That’s why the earth was warmer back then.
22 posted on
07/21/2012 10:41:04 PM PDT by
DustyMoment
(Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
To: dennisw
The real question should be, how deep will the ice be over Manhattan in the next 20,000 years? It is coming and not all the SUVs on Earth are going to stop it.
23 posted on
07/21/2012 10:52:00 PM PDT by
depressed in 06
(6 November, 2012, the day our embarrassment is sent back to Kenya.)
To: dennisw
Ah, those nasty Roman gas powered chariots!
To: dennisw
But but but but it was real hot a couple weeks ago.
31 posted on
07/23/2012 6:28:07 AM PDT by
Impy
(Don't call me red.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson