Condoleezza Rice supports selling out US Sovereignty via the Law of the Sea treaty

[Halfmanhalfamazing]

I post this as a differentiator. You can find plenty of information about Condi and the LOST treaty during the Bush years, but it can be common for people to do what the administration they're currently involve with wants done, despite it being counter to what they believe. Or they've had a change of opinion over time.

This is not the case in Condi's case, her position is clear outside of the Bush Administration. She does not support American sovereignty. Her opinion is her own.

Time to Join The Law of the Sea Treaty (May 30th 2012)

BY HENRY KISSINGER, GEORGE SHULTZ, JAMES BAKER III, COLIN POWELL AND CONDOLEEZZA RICE

The Convention of the Law of the Sea is again under consideration by the U.S. Senate. If the U.S. finally becomes party to this treaty, it will be a boon for our national security and economic interests. U.S. accession will codify our maritime rights and give us new tools to advance national interests.

It's unclear to me which parts of the article she wrote, because I can't read the whole thing. WSJ has it locked up past the first two paragraphs. But her name is on it. She owns it, by agreeing with it.

[iopscusa]

Condo is a Dumbo, as I’ve repeatedly said, Condo is the GOP version of the State Dept hag Albright, only worst because Condo has fooled so many including a lot of Freepers!

[LibLieSlayer]

rice and romney go together like rice and roni. Progressive statists that watched too much Star Trek and want a United Federation of Planets... kobol being one of them.

LLS