Posted on 07/14/2012 9:24:58 PM PDT by shoedog
I have to wonder if all the Romney haters on this site were the same people who ran home to mom when they lost at games as kids. I did not vote for Romney in the primaries. If you asked anyone that knows me, they would say I am right of Reagan. What I don't understand is all of you that love this country,which I truly believe you do, that are willing to not vote for Romney and potentially allow this country to fail by re-electing Obama!, how does that make sense?
No ones gets it. This is exactly what the opposition wants. Divide and conquer. With the group we have here.it’s been a breeze.
To equate Romney and Obama is supreme foolishness. The only thing you anti-Romney folks are showing is that you have more tolerance for Obama and what he's done to the country the past three years. It boggles the mind that you would consider not voting for Romney, thereby helping Obama win a second term. And yes, you will indeed be helping obama win a second term.
Romney won the GOP primary by capturing a majority of state electoral votes. The GOP-e did NOT force people to vote for the guy. You criticize those of us who've decided to be proactive and vote for the GOP nominee because he isn't the guy (or gal) you wanted. At least we're trying to remove the Kenyan! What are you anti-Romney folks doing? Nothing except using empty words like "Rebellion On!" Rebellion denotes an action.
Go ahead and have your pity party, stay home, and help Obama win a second term. This is utter foolishness and selfishness.
At least those of us who will be voting for Romney tried to remove the Marxist currently holding office. This is an imperfect world, where some decisions are just plain hard.
Thanks for the ping!
I would rather support someone with better interests, one who is most decidedly outspoken against the socialist invasion, one most likely to be the de-facto leader of a grass roots revolution to restore the Constitution.
I have lost faith in the election process, its lost its integrity, its been manipulated to place an ineligible person as POTUS, and it will do so again.
If Obama is re-elected I promise anyone there will be a rebellion and its leadership will be one person, the person the enemy does indeed truly fear.
They did not kill her and it has made her even stronger.
Romney has been too well protected, has no warrior spirit, and I believe he will be corrupted absolutely when given absolute power.
Lysol will not cleanse my computer's soul
Nor deleting Cookies, History, Cache
I may need to do a BrainWipe..... Again
Live by the liberal RINO squish... die by the liberal RINO squish.
Mittens = McCain, minus Palin. Rots o' ruck with that strategy.
Next time out, try running an actual conservative.
So who was the perfect 10/10 conservative in the race that fit your test?
.
“If you have somehow come to believe that voting for Mitt Romney will be the “most important” political act of your lifetime, then maybe the time has come for you to either elevate your political objectives or just plain give up on politics.”
Nobody- NOTHING could be worse than the Marxist/Muslim usurper sob sitting in the White House and systematically destroying America.
This is the most important presidential election of our lifetime, and we must get Obama out of office before he finishes destroying America. THAT must be our number one goal.
We have no choice but to vote for the Republican candidate.
That is just the way it is this time around.
Those staying home, doing a write-in or voting third party are helping to keep Omuslim in office.
We must go to the polls and vote not for Romney but AGAINST Obama.
.
Sloppy straw man, there; the result of hasty and ill-considered construction on your part. Neither I, nor any conservative on this site, has ever demanded "a perfect 10/10 conservative" in this race, thank awfully.
The issue at hand right now, sadly, is the hapless, uninspiring liberal squish increasingly panicky RINOs are attempting to drum up support for as November (and yet another electoral pimp-slapping) hoves closer, ever closer into fateful view.
My suggestion is that you try staying as focused on that painfully quixotic little endeavor. Quite frankly: you've got your work cut out for you.
“Haters”? Can you think of a term not used by liberals that doesn’t make you sound like a third grader?
Your analogy is not even logical. Try this: Did we cry to our parents when one teacher treated us badly and also cry when another teacher treated us nearly as badly but still badly enough?
Also, the letter ‘u’ really isn’t a substitute for the word ‘you’, unless you really are a third grader.
I see you live in Texas.
Are you telling me that you are voting for Romney because you fear that if you don’t vote for Romney, Obama will win Texas? Really? You want me to believe that?
Maybe it would be more credible for you to tell me that you’re voting for Romney because you like him. There’s no shame in that. Romney has lots of fans.
“Obama is a usurping, treasonous tyrant who should be impeached.”
And that, my FRiend, is the true course the Republicans and Democrats should be taking. If the Republicans and Democrats were about rule of law they would have gotten that creep out of office by now and this whole Romney thing wouldn’t even be discussed. We’d have a much better candidate and Obama wouldn’t have been an issue.
Instead, we are treated to bread and circuses, as thought it matters.
The modifier ‘wicked’ I’ve not seen before. I would be interested in your elaboration on that term, as in pleae itemize what wickedness the faux melchizedek high priest is known for. ... If you’re trying to refer to his lDSinc affiliation, then his membership in the faux high priesthood would be a far more damning reality than his bishopric designation. I might remind you that there are numerous Catholics and Protestants who have defended abortion as ‘a woman’s right ot choose’ most probably because they are not aware of the humanity and aliveness of the unborn and who have changed their position on abortion when finally educated as to the reality that willfully slaughtering the alive unborn is, well, murder. So his change regarding many of the abortion related issues is not alone a sign of ‘wickedness’. I can see where Obama can be defined as deeply wicked ... it is irrational to give the bastard the benefit of the doubt knowing he defended and tried to protect the willful killing of already born children if they survived an abortion attempt. Perhaps you would elaborate on Romney’s deeply wicked nature, eh?
OMGoodness! That poster is priceless. Excellent work whether you made it or found it. Thanks for posting.
I didn't did you? My Mom said take care of it, figure something out and deal with it.
I am not voting for Romney because he is a liberal, it is that simple.
You on the other hand appear to be voting for him even though he is a liberal, because you apparently suffer from obamahysteria, which would make one think that you cave or capitulate or compromise because of fear.
Well, indulge your doubts, but in my analysis, it's not only the best bet, it's literally the only option open for me as I refuse to vote for Romney because to do so would be to vote against my own interests both morally and politically.
Here's the thing about MSM bias. A bridge made of balsawood, no matter how sturdy and real the illusion appears, is still fake in the real world. The MSM creates the illusion that these Democrats are popular and that conservatives are the minority, but it is just like that balsa-wood bridge: fake, therefore inevitably subject to reality. You can hear it by listening in on conversations of liberal/Democrat friends/family when they talk about how disgusted they are with Obama, and you can see it when you read the reader comments after pro-Obama stories on MSM news sites.
The MSM can ignore it all they want and hocus-pocus the illusion that such dissent is the minority, but the reality is that most Americans loathe liberalism and loathe Obama. We are seeing now the inevitable results of a minority seizing power over a majority. Only this time there's a fractal component, because in our own Republican party, with Romney a liberal minority has also seized power over a conservative majority.
I believe our system is enough still intact that indeed, a plurality lack-of-mandate for the president matters no matter WHO it involves. Clinton was relatively popular, he was a blank slate because he was new, he had the MSM staunchly on his side, and he was elected by a 43% plurality where 57% voted against him; he clearly lacked a mandate. And in the mid-terms, he got his ass kicked by the Republican Revolution. Even with the MSM and general popularity on his side, that lack of mandate still hurt him. The Republican Revolution would probably never have happened if he'd won with a majority or if HWB had been re-elected.
One thing its thread has done is highlight the polarization that exists here over this issue.
The leftist GOPe is trying to destroy any trace of an option for whom conservatives can vote.
The so-called "conservative" party is no more. They've been infiltrated at the highest levels and leftists are in charge.
I pray that The Lord gives them ashes to eat and acid to drink. I pray that true Conservatives will wake up to what has happened and fight it with all our might.
"No More Mr. Nice Guy" -- Alice Cooper
Well, we will all be looking forward to the 3 Supreme Court Justices that Obama appoints.
I don’t think anybody is considering the magnitude of Obama’s second term.
If people believe that Political Correctness has run amok, just wait.
If people think that attacks on Religion, worship and God have run amok, just wait.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.