Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gene Eric; All
I understand the plurality argument, but I doubt it will matter if Obama wins.

Well, indulge your doubts, but in my analysis, it's not only the best bet, it's literally the only option open for me as I refuse to vote for Romney because to do so would be to vote against my own interests both morally and politically.

Here's the thing about MSM bias. A bridge made of balsawood, no matter how sturdy and real the illusion appears, is still fake in the real world. The MSM creates the illusion that these Democrats are popular and that conservatives are the minority, but it is just like that balsa-wood bridge: fake, therefore inevitably subject to reality. You can hear it by listening in on conversations of liberal/Democrat friends/family when they talk about how disgusted they are with Obama, and you can see it when you read the reader comments after pro-Obama stories on MSM news sites.

The MSM can ignore it all they want and hocus-pocus the illusion that such dissent is the minority, but the reality is that most Americans loathe liberalism and loathe Obama. We are seeing now the inevitable results of a minority seizing power over a majority. Only this time there's a fractal component, because in our own Republican party, with Romney a liberal minority has also seized power over a conservative majority.

I believe our system is enough still intact that indeed, a plurality lack-of-mandate for the president matters no matter WHO it involves. Clinton was relatively popular, he was a blank slate because he was new, he had the MSM staunchly on his side, and he was elected by a 43% plurality where 57% voted against him; he clearly lacked a mandate. And in the mid-terms, he got his ass kicked by the Republican Revolution. Even with the MSM and general popularity on his side, that lack of mandate still hurt him. The Republican Revolution would probably never have happened if he'd won with a majority or if HWB had been re-elected.

298 posted on 07/15/2012 9:28:56 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]


To: Finny; All

Well, we will all be looking forward to the 3 Supreme Court Justices that Obama appoints.

I don’t think anybody is considering the magnitude of Obama’s second term.

If people believe that Political Correctness has run amok, just wait.

If people think that attacks on Religion, worship and God have run amok, just wait.


300 posted on 07/15/2012 9:33:51 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: Finny

>> it’s literally the only option open for me as I refuse to vote for Romney because to do so would be to vote against my own interests both morally and politically.

I understand, Finny. I’m in no way questioning what’s in your heart.

I’m simply curious about the expectations of the passive vote. You make interesting points, and I would expect others to fall in line behind you.

>> I believe our system is enough still intact that indeed, a plurality lack-of-mandate for the president matters no matter WHO it involves.

I hope you’re right.


403 posted on 07/15/2012 10:11:02 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson