I think the term “google” originated in San Fransicko meaning weird sex acts involving gerbils....
“Legalize Love”?
You mean like man-boy love? Women-girl? Man and dog?
Glad I use Bing and Windows Phone.
Well... I’ve defended Google on many things over the years.
I never cared much what their homepage graphics did or didn’t depict.
But this is a bridge too far.
While they're on the alliteration kick, let me also suggest:
Sanction Sodomy
Codify Carpet Munching
Permit Perversion
Decree Debauchery
Good alternatives to Google:
Yahoo!
http://images.search.yahoo.com/
Advantages: Good quality, tailorable page (My Yahoo), with lots of options. Good image search.
Devilfinder:
http://images.devilfinder.com/
Advantages: Not tracked, no cookies, no search data kept on users. Good image search with a safe search option.
Factbites:
Advantages: Good for data search, as it eliminates vast amounts of web fluff pages. Searches are not listed by popularity, but by quality of data.
Yippy (despite the name, good for complicated searches)
Advantages: In addition to the primary search, it opens a left frame that orders major subject areas of a complex search, to help you narrow down what you are looking for.
Dogpile:
A search engine aggregator that only posts universal results found on several other search engines, eliminating advertised sites moved to the head of one of them, as well as other fluff.
No more Google for me, switching to Bing. It is the only search engine I know of that does not use Google on the back end.
“Legalize love?” Are they playing stupid just to get under our skin, or are they actually that stupid? Declining to recognize a particular partnership as a “marriage” is NOT the same as wanting to outlaw that partnership and any like it, and certainly not the same as outlawing “love.” The debate over the legal definition of marriage has NOTHING to do with love, sex, or anything citizens may consent to do with each other in their private lives. You cannot objectively define an emotion and enforce it as the term of a legal contract involving tax money.
And just to be annoyingly predictable: if marriage is nothing but a validation of people’s love for each other, does that mean love between more than two people isn’t realize love? Otherwise, anyone who opposes marriage licenses for more than two partners, even while advocating same-sex marriage, is as guilty as any of trying to “illegalize love.”
google sucks... literallyIf we legalize “Love,” shouldn’t we also legalize “Hate?” After all, to support one but to oppose the other would be discrimination...
Is Jerry Sandusky going o be their spokesman for this ad campaign? He would fit right in.
I love my pet gerbil, does this mean.....
Google’s got their back.
Of all the words under assault by the homosexual craze, love suffers the most.
OBVIOUSLY, Google does not know how to correctly define, “love.”
You have alternatives:
http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/5-secret-search-engines-way-better-than-google/
Any alternatives to gmail? Time for me to leave them.
What illegal love do they wish to legalize? Gay people can love all they want as it is not illegal. Actually anyone can love anyone or anything and it is not illegal to love someone or something.
A backdoor way of marginalizing the role of Faith in family, and also criminalizing Faith-based morality. It’s important people understand the sinister attack being waged primarily against Christianity.
The govt should not be defining marriage. Sorry, statists, but this a great example of how the Christian photographer whom refuses to service a homosexual ceremony will be charged, and prosecuted under the guise of state religion. And it’s already happened.
I just posted this to my Facebook page....with the question: “Since when is love Illegal?
Waiting for the fur to fly......