Posted on 07/07/2012 9:26:47 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
In my previously published article "Secrets Revealed," I concluded that what President Obama is concealing on his genuine long-form birth certificate (not the digital PDF forgery released to the public) is that his mother signed her maiden name.
snip
Personally, I think the preponderance of evidence shows that Obama's marriage to Ann Dunham was a legal contrivance that suited both their purposes -- Obama's as a means to maintain residency in the U.S. until he completed his studies, and Ann's (and maybe also her parents') to provide legitimacy to the baby's birth. In no way was this a meaningful marital relationship.
So were they really married? Yes, they went through the legal steps to become married. But because Obama the father was already married, the marriage wasn't legal -- and it certainly wasn't functional -- so they weren't really married in the way we understand marriage.
I know that my conclusion -- that Ann likely signed her maiden name to baby Barack's birth certificate because her marriage wasn't a real one, and that that's what's being hidden by the release of the "birth certificate" forgery -- is a huge disappointment to people who think that the president is hiding something much bigger -- like being born in Kenya. (Understandably, since releasing the digital PDF fake is a pretty big scam to cover up a pretty unimportant detail.)
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
If such photos existed, they would have been made public, as it would give proof of the myth. No photos, no proof, his life “story” is a myth.
It depends who has the pics, if they were to be made public.im just saying they could be, and if a loyal obot has daming info -they wont release it. im sure theres alot of stuff out there thats keep secret about baraq.. sheriff joe is bringing out new facts that wasnt made public..
I am just tired of hearing looney-toon idiot theories.
I think you've been inhaling too much smoke.
Says who?
Thank you for your sanity! I was just tired of hearing that "there are no pregnant pictures of Stanley Ann" as though it were a huge and significant fact. It means nothing. Some people take pictures when they are pregnant, others don't. I don't know anyone in my family that has pictures while they were pregnant, so I couldn't understand why people kept repeating this as if it proved anything.
As I said, there are still Dunham family pictures that we have not yet seen. (You can see some of them on the video interview with Virginia Goeldner) There might actually BE pregnant pictures of Stanley Ann. The fact that we haven't seen any doesn't prove anything at all!
Of course, for what it's worth, we actually HAVE seen pictures of a pregnant Stanley Ann. Those Nude Photographs of her were taken AFTER she became pregnant, but of course she was not "showing" in any of those photographs.
I have to once more offer my admiration for your ability to find photos and information. You certainly have a talent for it.
It was clear they were hiding something when they hastily flew him to Hawaii and offed the grandmother during the election timing. Whatever the secret, she knew.
It is not unreasonable for people's recollections to have a few inconsistencies. An atheist I once argued with pointed out that the events described in Mathew, Mark, Luke and John don't quite jive with each other. He is correct. They don't. (I argued that since none of the apostles were present at the crucifixion, they got their information second hand from someone who was there. Had they been collaborating, there would be no inconsistencies between their accounts at all.)
The point is, inconsistencies are not unusual in people's recollection of events. In this case, there exists other information which reinforces what Susan Blake said. There is the University of Washington Records showing Ann Obama registered for school there. There is the Polk Directory showing her present there. There is the eyewitness accounts of Maxine Box and Mary Toutonghi. Suffice it to say, that enough evidence exists to require the burden of proof to be placed on any challenger to this account.
I have seen no credible challenge to the notion that Ann Obama/Dunham was in Seattle from August of 1961 through the summer of 1962.
LMAO
I think the guy is pure evil. evil comes with a smile and lies.. “ If satan had a son”
I'm not the one posing fanciful theories backed up by nothing but fact free fruit loop speculation!
0bama-mama was a BDSM queen.
See post # 101. Pictures were vetted as being SAD. Taken at Frank Marshall Davis home, and circulated in girlie magazines. Plus there are many other pictures out there not in circulation, that were in those girlie magazines, not fit for publication. Your eyes are bad, and your brain is non-functioning.
You’re welcome. Sometimes I wonder if I have a shred of “sanity” left after these past few years. I used to think it was pertinent, too, the missing photos of her pregnant, until you said that about your family. Then I thought back. No photos of my mom pregnant with me, either, or most of my siblings.
Stanley Ann wasn’t particularly camera shy, if that is her in those nudie pics. She wouldn’t look her “best” pregnant. Could be she avoided the camera while pregnant. Come to think about it, she might be pregnant in that photo of her in the white dress, standing with Barack Sr. at the airport. That was supposed to be 1971; Maya was born 1970. But nothing they tell us is real, so maybe she was pregnant with Maya at the time, although she might be photoshopped into the picture in the first place.
I’ve read all the stuff and there is no “vetted” in it, it is various peoples’ speculation plus untruths, with no facts to back up any of it. Vetted my ***.
Wow. Barbara Bush was really gorgeous, wasn’t she? She almost looks like...dare I say it? A Kennedy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.