Posted on 06/28/2012 1:57:36 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
In 255-67 vote, House places Holder in contempt of Congress By Jordy Yager and Pete Kasperowicz - 06/28/12 04:37 PM ET
The House voted Thursday to place Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for not complying with a congressional subpoena.
Seventeen Democrats bucked party lines and voted with Republicans to pass a criminal contempt resolution in a 255-67 vote. House Oversight and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) pushed that resolution as part of his 16-month investigation into a botched Fast and Furious gun-tracking operation.
Only two Republicans voted no on the measure, while 65 Democrats recorded "no" votes and 108 Democrats didn't cast votes. Most of them were protesting the fact that the House GOP was holding the vote.
The two Republican "no" votes were Reps. Steve LaTourette (Ohio) and Scott Rigell (Va.). Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.) was the only "present" vote from either party.
The Department of Justice is not expected to enforce the criminal contempt measure against Holder. But before the end of the day, the House was also expected to pass a separate resolution allowing the GOP House to pursue civil court action against Holder.
That second resolution could lead to a lengthy court battle if Issa pursues civil action against Holder.
While 17 Democrats sided with Republicans in the contempt vote, it was met with outrage from Democrats. The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) joined by Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and many other Democrats staged a walkout during the vote as Democrats charged the GOP with staging a witch hunt against Holder that demeans the lower chamber.
Pelosi said during the debate that she would join the walkout, and told Democrats it's up to them whether to stay and vote against the resolution, or leave.
"So now I say to those who have a doubt about how they want to proceed, that instead of doing what I said before — which was just to come and to treat this as a bill before the Congress and express my no — listening to the unconscionable presentation, I want to join my CBC colleagues in boycotting the vote when we have the walkout after we have the debate," she said.
Several other Democrats also charged Republicans with making political hay against the Obama administration to help them in the November elections.
"When the history of this despicable proceeding is recorded, it will be said that your actions were politically motivated to discredit and defeat a president who has worked so hard over the past three years," Rep. G.K. Butterfield (D-N.C.) declared on the House floor during rule debate.
But Republicans decried Holder's refusal to hand over documents relating to the Justice Department's reaction to Operation Fast and Furious as nothing less than a "cover-up" and pointed to President Obama's assertion of executive privilege over the material as evidence of the administration's lack of transparency.
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) made a rare appearance on the floor to call for support for the resolution.
"I don't take this matter lightly, and I frankly hoped it would never come to this," Boehner said about an hour before voting started.
"But no Justice Department is above the law, and no Justice Department is above the Constitution, which each of us has sworn an oath to uphold," he said. "So I ask the members of this body to come together and to support this resolution."
Before the final vote, the House rejected a motion from Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) to recommit the resolution to Issa's committee. That motion failed 172-251, after which dozens of Democrats left the chamber.
As chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Issa has led Congress's investigation of Fast and Furious, which oversaw the sale of nearly 2,000 firearms to straw buyers for Mexican drug cartels.
Issa was initially concerned with uncovering who was responsible for allowing guns to "walk" during the operation. But he recently switched the primary concentration of his probe to focus on the DOJ's internal communications after the details of the operation were made public.
At the center of the feud between the DOJ and Issa is a letter the department sent last year to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) stating that it does everything in its power to stop guns from going to Mexico. Ten months later, the DOJ took the rare step of withdrawing the letter because it contained false information.
Nearly two months before the DOJ rescinded the letter, Issa subpoenaed Holder for documents related to the fallout that the letter's misinformation had caused.
But after turning over about 7,600 pages of documents to Issa on Fast and Furious, the Attorney General has refused to comply with the remainder of the subpoena, stating that much of the requested information would jeopardize ongoing prosecutions and criminal cases if it were made public.
After attempts at negotiating a compromise failed last week, the president — at Holder's urging — asserted executive privilege over the documents in question.
The DOJ's inspector general has been investigating the failed operation for more than a year as well. And Issa says he should have access to the roughly 80,000 documents that the IG has received from the DOJ.
This was no “witch-hunt”, but if you wanted to hold a “Bitch-hunt”, just look at Pelosi, Waters, Wasserman-Putz, Sheila Jackson Lee, Barbara Lee, Maloney, Murphy, Schakowsky, etc.
There aren’t enough “Bitch-hunt” permits to get all the Democrat feminist thingies, and I haven’t even mentioned the Senate or Hillary or The Wookie.
Have you noticed that Pelosi is sounding so crazy that even liberal political/legal commentators are asking what is happening to her?
Pelosi, singing, “I go crazy”. Waters singing, “I am crazy”. Wasserman-Putz singing “I’m a dingdong and don’t wash my hair, ever”.
They’re coming to get me, ha ha, heh heh! (Pelosi).
IMO the 108 D who left were just covering their _____. They did NOT want it on record that they supported illegal activies by JustUS and the Won.
Rat voting for Contempt of Congress
Rep. Jason Altmire, D-Pa.
Rep. John Barrow, D-Ga.
Rep. Dan Boren, D-Okla.
Rep. Leonard Boswell, D-Iowa
Rep. Ben Chandler, D-Ky.
Rep. Mark Critz, D-Pa.
Rep. Joe Donnelly, D-Ind.
Rep. Kathy Hochul, D-N.Y.
Rep. Ron Kind, D-Wis.
Rep. Larry Kissell, D-N.C.
Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah
Rep. Mike McIntyre, D-N.C.
Rep. Bill Owens, D-N.Y.
Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn.
Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va.
Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark.
Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minn.
“Nancy Pelosi...She’s as corrupt as Holder, Obama, and Reid.”
She said they would pass Obamacare if it cost them their jobs. They lose their jobs by getting voted out...she admitted the will of the people is to be ignored.
Nazi Pelosi - fascist is as fascist does.
I think it is a $1000 fine, actually; it would be nice to be wrong, though.
In any case, this is prosecuted by the Federal Attorney for DC whose boss is... Eric Holder.
We probably won’t even get a decent discovery phase out of him...
Good to see Nazi Polizei and the Professional Black Racists decided to throw their childish tantrum. A bunch of O.J. jury wannabes.
Donnelly IN is the Senate candidate for Lugar’s seat.
FOX just reported that because the vote was taken today, the Civil case will be heard by end of summer and will be expidated ....Any one know how soon it can be settled and the House recieve the papers they’ve requested?
Okay! Good!
Now what?
The fact that they did NOT vote to support WithHolder indicates the walk out was just a guise to hide the fact that they didn’t want to vote to support criminal actions by 0.
As I see it, this places the documents in limbo. Actually, I would assume they are considered evidence to any further hearings and will remain so until a decision is reached which could be months.
“Our Republic is dead.”
It’s only dead when we quit fighting.
Good point.
“... 108 Democrats didn’t cast votes. Most of them were protesting the fact that the House GOP was holding the vote.”
Most of them were chicken.
My closer is that more than 8 times as many Democrats crossed party lines to oppose Holder than Republicans crossed to support him.
OR they didn’t want to be on record as supporting illegal program. They could have voted and supported WithHolder and then walked out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.