The straw is in your court, vladimir.
I see it is easier for you to “communicate” with me if you believe that I am a Protestant.
(In fact you cannot communicate with me at all, only with Protestants! On second thought, I am sure you cannot communicate with them either. That unemcumbered thing that Christains have is difficult for you.)
There is your strawman.
And why there can be no reasoned debate.
Your refusal to deal with the reality of the situation is a very strong trait of a cultist.
But that was established days ago.
I suggest you find some Protestants to harangue, as that is your chosen mission here.
You wrote:
“The straw is in your court, vladimir.”
Nope. It’s all yours.
“I see it is easier for you to “communicate” with me if you believe that I am a Protestant.”
No, I don’t think you see that. If you’re a Protestant, then you’re a Protestant.
“(In fact you cannot communicate with me at all, only with Protestants! On second thought, I am sure you cannot communicate with them either. That unemcumbered thing that Christains have is difficult for you.)”
Avoid the truth all you like, but it will still be the truth.
“There is your strawman.”
Nope. I have none. You have plenty.
“And why there can be no reasoned debate.”
A reasoned debate would necessitate the presence of two people who can reason. A Protestant who denies being one, cannot reason.
“Your refusal to deal with the reality of the situation is a very strong trait of a cultist.”
I am the only one here dealing with the reality of the situation. A Protestant is a Protestant. That is reality.
“But that was established days ago.”
What was established is the reality you deny.
“I suggest you find some Protestants to harangue, as that is your chosen mission here.”
I’m not haranging anyone, but if anyone ever feels the need to harangue a Protestant you fit the bill to a T.