You wrote:
“The straw is in your court, vladimir.”
Nope. It’s all yours.
“I see it is easier for you to “communicate” with me if you believe that I am a Protestant.”
No, I don’t think you see that. If you’re a Protestant, then you’re a Protestant.
“(In fact you cannot communicate with me at all, only with Protestants! On second thought, I am sure you cannot communicate with them either. That unemcumbered thing that Christains have is difficult for you.)”
Avoid the truth all you like, but it will still be the truth.
“There is your strawman.”
Nope. I have none. You have plenty.
“And why there can be no reasoned debate.”
A reasoned debate would necessitate the presence of two people who can reason. A Protestant who denies being one, cannot reason.
“Your refusal to deal with the reality of the situation is a very strong trait of a cultist.”
I am the only one here dealing with the reality of the situation. A Protestant is a Protestant. That is reality.
“But that was established days ago.”
What was established is the reality you deny.
“I suggest you find some Protestants to harangue, as that is your chosen mission here.”
I’m not haranging anyone, but if anyone ever feels the need to harangue a Protestant you fit the bill to a T.
Perhaps you should have looked up straw man:
A fallacy in which an opponent's argument is misrepresented in order to be attackedYour psychosis is showing. Pathological lying is the bedrock of your cult.
It's understandable from a clinical point of view that you believe what you make up.
Backing down into reality is impossible when one is into the depths of psychotic behavior such as that which you exhibit.
Don't even try it, it could be quite detrimental to any hope of recovering your mental health.
Dr. Zoo of the Institute of Phenomonology has some processes that may bring you back to reality.
I'll ping him.
Dr. Zoo, is the fact that Vladimir accepts that he exhibits cultist traits a good sign?
PS vladi, look up harangue also.