Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

Mandate survives under the taxing power of the Federal governemnt—Roberts has joined with the four lefties to give them a 5-4 decision.

Roberts says the mandate is not a proper under the “Commerce Clause” or the “Necessary and Proper” clause,but OK under the taxing power—has nothing to do with fairness of what Congress enacts.

The Dred Scott decison of 2012.

Thus, the entire act is upheld as Constitutional.


271 posted on 06/28/2012 7:16:27 AM PDT by exit82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: exit82

Would you not agree this is a strictly constitutional decision? In other words, Justice Roberts agreed that it’s outside the reach of the Commerce Clause but not outside Congress’s constitutionally-granted power to tax?


287 posted on 06/28/2012 7:20:09 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

To: exit82
Amy Howe: The court reinforces that individuals can simply refuse to pay the tax and not comply with the mandate.

You gotta be $hitting me!

295 posted on 06/28/2012 7:21:55 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Steyn: "One can argue about whose fault it is, but not ... whose responsibility it is: it's his")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

To: exit82

Kennedy got it right but Roberts got it wrong - even after his extremely skepical questioning during the hearings.

Does anybody now doubt what I’ve been saying for a long time now - that John Roberts has been threatened? The measure of the value of a hypothesis is if it accurately predicts future events. I had this one pegged - against the collective wisdom of Intrade. And even against folks with insider knowledge, like Jake Tapper who claimed that Roberts was going to support Obamacare in order to hold Kennedy’s hand. In the end, the whole thing stood or fell with Roberts, and he did exactly what Soros told him to do. Just as I feared and stated publicly based on my belief that Roberts has exhibited signs of being compromised all along, ever since the day of the Donofrio conference when Roberts made an unprecedented and unethical ex parte invitation to Obama to visit SCOTUS.

His vote on Arizona was not to buy Kennedy’s cooperation on Obamacare. His stances on both decisions are unconstitutional.

He’s the mouthpiece of George Soros - after Soros told Roberts he and his communist-Islamist alliance would make another run on the bank if Roberts didn’t do as he was told.

This country has literally been taken hostage. This is exactly why Obama’s ineligibility is so critical. Once the camel’s nose is under the tent, it’s just a matter of time before the whole thing comes down. They got Roberts to swear in Obama and ignore all the eligibility cases by threatening another run on the bank, and now they can use the same threat to do whatever they darn well please. At this point they don’t even care that people are figuring it out.

2008 was a communist-Islamist coup. Simple statement of fact.


331 posted on 06/28/2012 7:30:05 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

To: exit82

That’s pretty much it. We finally put some boundaries on the Commerce clause, but we’re still stuck with the damn law.


337 posted on 06/28/2012 7:31:26 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Election 2012 - America stands or falls. No more excuses. Get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson