Posted on 06/20/2012 4:34:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Sarah Palin says that Obama did not respect the balance of power in the federal government when he issued his executive order last week on immigration, that he is now just telling Americans what he deems best by fiat. It was so blatant that she also suggested that we go back and talk to some of his former students because it’s clear Obama doesn’t understand our constitutional process.
She was also asked about criticism that she didn’t mention Romney in her speech at Right Online. But her reason was simple, that it would have violated the ground rules based on AFP’s legal status as a non-profit. But she makes very clear where she stands and said that if the vote were had today, she wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney over Obama and maintains she’s always held the position of anybody but Obama.
Watch below Video at link:
Sarah Palin said last summer in Iowa that she could support Mitt Romney.
Maybe you’re on the wrong forum if you blanketly label people who have objections to Romney as “Mormon haters”.
Yep
“...she affirms it’s ANYBODY. BUT. OBAMA.”
Well, that’s good enough for me.
I want to state right now and right here that I WILL NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA. I WILL vote for SOMEBODY ELSE.
Everybody happy now?
Sounds a lot like those who say if you object to Obama and/or his liberal agenda you are racist.
cowards are always Screaming about something!
That you think Romney's Mormonism has anything to do with why I think ABO is a stupid strategy if the result is Romney, tells a lot more about you than it does about me.
I love Palin dearly, but she's wrong about ABO. ABO is based on fear, and fear is a LOSING STRATEGY.
There is no such thing as voting "against" a candidate. I'd love it if a vote for Romney was only a vote "against" Obama, but the sad and harsh truth is that a vote for Romney is a vote FOR increasing liberalism and statism in the Republican party as well as in America.
I know what I'll be voting FOR if it's O v R. I'll be voting FOR making the road as rough and overwhelming as possible for whichever statist wins, Obama or Romney, and I'll do that by voting third party at the top of the ticket in order to split the vote into a plurality so the winner is still opposed by a majority.
That is what I'll be voting FOR -- because in the end, there is no such thing as voting "against" a candidate. No matter how I vote, I can't prevent an authoritarian anti-conservative statist from taking the presidency. But I can vote FOR making him as weak as possible, and that is what I will do, and what I pray Americans with common sense will do, in November.
Or you could join those of us (also on this forum) and vote for one of the two candidates who will actually win.
In the “R” column.
Then once the election is over, get back to your real message.
That’s what I’ll be doing.
Why would I vote for someone who endorsed John McCain to spend six more years f’ing up our capital and the nation, and who also told the Tea Party he was one of them?
No thanks.
http://www.hotr.us/mccain/mccainagain.html
“Same here. I find it funny how some on here can rationalize Mitt’s and his views.”
Militant ScreamingFist fits in with Romney, as Fist’s “about page” says, “I am a right social moderate”
I’m no moderate and neither are you, Clyde. There are four choices when one votes - Romney, another candidate, write in someone if your state allows it, skip the presidential vote line. Whatever you choose, it is not a vote for Hussein as his name is on another line.
LOL! Sorry, isn't that easy, bigmouth. The beauty is that you Mormon haters are only about 50 or so on FR. You're just very, very vocal. So....you little 50 trolls just keep spouting your nonsense, the rest of us will concern ourselves with getting the marxist out of the Whitehouse......have a nice day.
“I trust Sarah’s judgment.
Don’t you?”
Sure. It’s good to have a real choice.
Like Utah’s death penalty: Shooting or hanging.
Your choice.
Thank you WindFlier.
I doubt you relish being placed in this position any more than I do. We tried to tell them earlier this year. They wouldn’t listen the first quarter of this year, and now I’m deaf to them the last quarter of this year.
Sad. True.
I identify with your thoughts on this. You worded it nicely.
“In reality, you are no patriot. You and the rest of anti-Mitts only make yourselves look more and more delusional with each passing comment.”
Now listen here you ignorant newbie:
You have NO BUSINESS questioning the patriotism of Freepers who refuse to vote for Romney. You can support whomever you like. Vote for the Liberal Romney for all I care. But you are here on a CONSERVATIVE website insulting people for BEING CONSERVATIVE.
You are either a troll or an idiot. Take your pick.
And after you pick, you can go screw yourself.
I call it like I see it Boogie. After they badmouth Romney, they usually go on to thump their version of the Bible.....just saying...;)
Sarah addressed that herself. She said the host organization prohibited her from doing it because she would have jeopardized their tax exempt status.
How's that bio coming along troll?
Get back to me when she unequivocally endorses the bum and starts campaigning for him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.