Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Words fail me.

Notice that the original proposal for a lengthy waiting period after the last homosexual "encounter" is now absent, and "how" homos engage in their behavior is now the focus.

1 posted on 06/14/2012 9:48:27 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: fwdude

May we please see John Kerry put his arm out for a safe gay blood transfusion to show the way?

Maybe from his (M)ass buddy Barney Frank?


2 posted on 06/14/2012 9:51:31 AM PDT by silverleaf (Every human spent about half an hour as a single cell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

The left is running low on radical AIDS victims to press for more funding to be sent to the DNC.
It’s just like they are running out of Homos in San Fran and need to teach it in school.
Even lab rats have higher moral values.


3 posted on 06/14/2012 9:52:46 AM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

Who in H wants or needs their blood? Why do they want to “contribute” (i.e. pollute the pool)?


4 posted on 06/14/2012 9:53:23 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

NO.
A thousand times; NO.


6 posted on 06/14/2012 9:55:08 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

I wanted to comment, but I don’t know what to say. I am utterly speechless. Have a good day.


8 posted on 06/14/2012 9:56:39 AM PDT by BRK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude
In their letter, Kerry and Quigley asked HHS to explore ways of distinguishing "high-risk" homosexuals from "low-risk" homosexuals.

Another attempt to 'normalize' homosexuality. The next thing will be a squabble over the definition of high vs. low risk followed by handwringing over the horror/shame/discrimination of being labeled high risk .... so to avoid hurt feelings and potential discrimination there will be no risk assigned and the general population will be the ones 'at risk'.

9 posted on 06/14/2012 9:57:04 AM PDT by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

I thought it takes the HIV virus six months to show up in tests to be sure whether or not the blood is contaminated. Or is my information ‘outdated’ as well?

This has to be a stealth population control technique or something to reduce the ‘surplus’ population.


10 posted on 06/14/2012 9:57:41 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (The GOPe has played us like a violin for the last time; high time to build the Constitution Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

So they admit there is a risk.

Now, what is a low risk homersexual?


12 posted on 06/14/2012 9:58:26 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( (Lord, save me from some conservatives, they don't understand history any better than liberals.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

“Patients across the country desperately need life-saving blood transfusions, yet perfectly healthy would-be donors are turned away based solely on sexual orientation,” Quigley said.


Another lie, they are turned away because of a HEALTH RISK.


13 posted on 06/14/2012 9:59:55 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( (Lord, save me from some conservatives, they don't understand history any better than liberals.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

Stinkin’ BASTARDS!!!


14 posted on 06/14/2012 10:00:30 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

I had several blood transfusions in the early 80s due to major surgeries. To this day I have nightmares that eventually a test will turn up positive.

People advocating for homosexuals to donate blood should be tried and sentenced for endangering public health. And if they get their wish and someone turns a positive, then murder charges should be forthcoming.


15 posted on 06/14/2012 10:01:35 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude
Absolute insanity! If this passes, I would not accept a transfusion of other than my own or a close family member's blood. To do otherwise would be sheer Russian roulette. 



Genuflectimus non ad principem sed ad Principem Pacis!

Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)

17 posted on 06/14/2012 10:04:37 AM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

Message to Romney: Attack Sebelius. Attack. Attack. Attack.


20 posted on 06/14/2012 10:06:40 AM PDT by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

these people are just insane


21 posted on 06/14/2012 10:07:32 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 0bie don' t eat my dog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

You know....we need to start a blood bank of VERY CLEAN living individuals who want to share their blood among each other...we tried giving blood for a friend, but were told it would just go into the POOL (the blood bank)....and that you couldn’t give your blood specifically to a certain person...this is WRONG.


22 posted on 06/14/2012 10:07:45 AM PDT by goodnesswins (What has happened to America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

there is a gap between what We the People would define as “success” in the HIV epidemic...and what OUR RMPLOYEES in DC would define as “success”...for them....more cases =success.

That gap is the measure of the lack of accountability to us that We the People have allowed to occur.


23 posted on 06/14/2012 10:07:45 AM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

They have been effectively been doing this in CA for some time. When I lived there (moved to a red state since then), I noted the following change of routine when I gave blood.

I was taken to a private place - where I could be alone behind a curtain - and counseled. I was given a sheet with two sets of barcodes - one code indicating that as far as I knew my blood was good, another not to use my blood. Alone, I was to put the barcode on my blood bag - so a casual observer would not know if my choice were a yes or no. In private, I dispensed of the sheet, minus my barcode in a covered garbage can - so the workers would not know my choice.

I figured this was done so that those who knew they had bad blood (AIDS, whatever) could go through all the motions of giving blood without their friends being any wiser to their true condtion.

That was about ten years ago.


24 posted on 06/14/2012 10:09:15 AM PDT by NEWwoman (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

there is no low risk homosexuals.


25 posted on 06/14/2012 10:09:35 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

How many people have to die so that Homosexual men can feel better about themselves? And we all know that if anyone really dies as a result of this, it will be hushed up. After all, when it comes to Homosexual feelings, we’re all expendable.


26 posted on 06/14/2012 10:10:02 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

I love it when people ask me if I would contribute to “AIDS” whatever whatever. I tell them that there’s already a perfectly good AIDS vaccine available, and my wife and I were inoculated down at our church.

Does anyone have links to data showing the % difference between homos and normal people when it comes to different diseases? Seems to me I saw somewhere that homos were >500x as likely to catch STD’s than heterosexuals.


29 posted on 06/14/2012 10:14:45 AM PDT by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson