CNN 'Birther Buster' Report 'Perpetrates Fraud'

wnd ^ | June 6, 2012 | Corsi

[Red Steel]

Network misrepresents microfilm birth record as Obama's

On the heels of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse’s investigative trip to Hawaii, CNN pulled out old material – including microfilm misrepresented as Barack Obama’s birth certificate – to run a report called “Busting the Birther Conspiracy Theory.”

In the segment, broadcast May 30, reporter Gary Tuchman declared his intention to refute conclusively the contention Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent.

Some careful observers, however, objected that the Tuchman report was a rebroadcast of material that CNN originally broadcast last year and possibly even earlier.

Moreover, CNN showed a microfilm copy of a birth certificate as if it were Obama’s original 1961 record. But it turned out to be someone else’s birth certificate.

At approximately the 1:22 mark of the segment, CNN displayed a microfilm copy of what viewers were led to believe was Obama’s birth certificate.

Close examination of a screen capture as seen in Exhibit 1 makes clear that the document is not Obama’s.

As seen in Exhibit 2, when the microfilm birth certificate is enlarged, the number appears to end with the digits “000,” while the computer-generated long-form birth certificate displayed on the White House website on April 27, 2011, bears the number “10641.”

[lowbridge]

bump

[Ratman83]

The way he acts it could be, of course I guess that would justify the birther worries.

[philman_36]

In your #16 I thought you were including yourself in the “eligible” crowd that mocks we Constitutionalists.
I don't understand how such an assumption could be made. As I said in reply @65... They'll strongly argue, not "we'll" strongly argue.
That one word lets the reader know I'm in the opposite camp.

Please accept my abject apology.
I can hardly blame you for wanting to out a possible troll.
However, you should at least look and see where the poster stands before you make your comment. It's not that hard to do.

Peace pipe smoked with you as well.

[bacall]

It’s worth a lot! Thanks. I thought that I remembered reading somewhere that Michelle admitted giving the notes to Ayers, but didn’t remember the source. Jodi Kantor’s book.

[rolling_stone]

...In 1971, BHO Sr. returned to Hawaii to complain his parental rights were terminated without his knowledge or consent. Most likely, Stanley testified BHO Sr. was not the father and the Soetoro adoption should remain intact...

then who gave consent to the adoption as the father? what about obama sr presumed father due to marriage to SAD?http://www.courts.state.hi.us/docs/1FP/ptn.pdf