Posted on 06/07/2012 11:11:57 AM PDT by Red Steel
Network misrepresents microfilm birth record as Obama's
On the heels of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaios Cold Case Posses investigative trip to Hawaii, CNN pulled out old material including microfilm misrepresented as Barack Obamas birth certificate to run a report called Busting the Birther Conspiracy Theory.
In the segment, broadcast May 30, reporter Gary Tuchman declared his intention to refute conclusively the contention Obamas birth certificate is fraudulent.
Some careful observers, however, objected that the Tuchman report was a rebroadcast of material that CNN originally broadcast last year and possibly even earlier.
Moreover, CNN showed a microfilm copy of a birth certificate as if it were Obamas original 1961 record. But it turned out to be someone elses birth certificate.
At approximately the 1:22 mark of the segment, CNN displayed a microfilm copy of what viewers were led to believe was Obamas birth certificate.
Close examination of a screen capture as seen in Exhibit 1 makes clear that the document is not Obamas.
As seen in Exhibit 2, when the microfilm birth certificate is enlarged, the number appears to end with the digits 000, while the computer-generated long-form birth certificate displayed on the White House website on April 27, 2011, bears the number 10641.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
bump
The way he acts it could be, of course I guess that would justify the birther worries.
Please accept my abject apology.
I can hardly blame you for wanting to out a possible troll.
However, you should at least look and see where the poster stands before you make your comment. It's not that hard to do.
Peace pipe smoked with you as well.
It’s worth a lot! Thanks. I thought that I remembered reading somewhere that Michelle admitted giving the notes to Ayers, but didn’t remember the source. Jodi Kantor’s book.
...In 1971, BHO Sr. returned to Hawaii to complain his parental rights were terminated without his knowledge or consent. Most likely, Stanley testified BHO Sr. was not the father and the Soetoro adoption should remain intact...
then who gave consent to the adoption as the father? what about obama sr presumed father due to marriage to SAD?http://www.courts.state.hi.us/docs/1FP/ptn.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.