Here's a thought...how many times have you asked those freepers who swear that martin attacked zimmermen without provocation to provide proof? Why would you just accept that as true?,P>
Bear in mind these few things that we know to be true...
Martin had no record of violence, suspension from school but no violence. There is a video of him boxing with a friend but that is exactly what I did as a teen and what my son did.
Zimmerman has at least two incidents that created legal records (he interfered physically with a LEO doing his job and he bounced his girlfriend around).
Zimmerman was actively trying to close the gap between himself and martin - he got out of his car and followed.
Martin took action to avoid confrontation - he ran away from the strange grown man who was following him.
The question to ask is what proof is there that martin went from active avoidance to "assault with intent to kill" and when did zimmerman go from armed pursier to victim?
I’m asking you to give me a credible explanation for what life-threatening danger prompted Trayvon to bang Zimmerman’s head on the concrete - a life-threatening danger that left no injuries on Trayvon’s body throughout a fight that lasted several minutes (IIRC) before Zimmerman fired the gun.
At the point that Trayvon smashed Zimnmerman’s head on the concrete, what was threatening Trayvon’s life?
>> “Martin had no record of violence” <<
.
That is a lie and you know it.
His own brother said that he had severely beaten a bus driver and that was the reason that he was on suspension, and in Zimmerman’s neighborhood.
He also had posted considerable violent comments on internet sites, that have been noted here, although they have now been taken down.
Why are you always on the evil side here?