Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ny mayor blasts sugar ban critics: that's a lot of soda
oregonherald. ^ | Friday June 1, 2012 10:46 AM

Posted on 06/02/2012 7:22:16 AM PDT by BenLurkin

NEW YORK - New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg offered a full-throated defense of his proposed ban on large-size sugary sodas on Friday, calling criticism of the proposal "ridiculous" and saying his city is again leading the way in taking on critical health issues.

Coca-Cola, the world's largest soft-drink maker, assailed the proposal in a statement on Thursday.

"New Yorkers expect and deserve better than this,' the Coca-Cola statement said. "They can make their own choices about beverages they purchase."

Meanwhile, New York State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, a Democrat, told The New York Post on Thursday that he was considering state legislation to thwart the measure.

"We may be getting too close to Big Brother," Silver told the newspaper. "I just think we ought to step back and look at the freedoms that we have been given in this country and reflect on them."

"You think this was bad?" Bloomberg asked. With the smoking ban, "everybody was opposed to it. today, virtually every major city in America does it ... whole countries!

"If people are yelling and screaming, there's nothing you can do about that. I mean, this is ridiculous."

"Nobody is taking away any of your rights," Bloomberg said later in the broadcast. "This way, we're just telling you That's a lot of soda.'

(Excerpt) Read more at oregonherald.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: healthnazi; nanny; nannystate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
The soda measure will be introduced on June 12 at a New York City Board of Health meeting. The board is expected to pass the mayor's measure, following a three-month public comment period.

"Public comment period" is just a sick farce.

The proponent is already rejecting arguments against it...and the Board is expected to approve no matter what.

1 posted on 06/02/2012 7:22:25 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If Bloomberg keeps stuff like this up, I think NYC is going to crack....and it won’t be pretty.


2 posted on 06/02/2012 7:25:13 AM PDT by digital-olive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Unbelievable the gov’t has the balls to tell us what size of drinks we are allowed to consume..pure madness.


3 posted on 06/02/2012 7:28:39 AM PDT by trailhkr1 (All you need to know about Zimmerman, innocent = riots, manslaughter = riots, guilty = riots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digital-olive

He’s gone off the deep end. Next he will be forcing courtesy flushes in private bathrooms.


4 posted on 06/02/2012 7:29:01 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

5 posted on 06/02/2012 7:29:38 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Hey Bloomberg .... have you noticed that some evil people are selling foot-long hot dogs. A little irresponsible, wouldn’t you say ?


6 posted on 06/02/2012 7:30:06 AM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“that’s a lot of soda”

Yes it is, but it’s none of his or government’s business. Individuals have the right to make their own decisions and government should do only what it’s supposed to do.


7 posted on 06/02/2012 7:30:29 AM PDT by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“that’s a lot of soda”

Yes it is, but it’s none of his or government’s business. Individuals have the right to make their own decisions and government should do only what it’s supposed to do.


8 posted on 06/02/2012 7:30:29 AM PDT by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: layman

Don’t give him ideas.


9 posted on 06/02/2012 7:32:06 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It has less to do with sugar than it does with the nanny state. Whether we consume too much sugar or not is not the province of government period.


10 posted on 06/02/2012 7:36:15 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digital-olive

Just let it be a huge crack.


11 posted on 06/02/2012 7:38:12 AM PDT by izzatzo (Just beat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I expect him to ban pre-marital relations in addition to homosexual behavior because it is proven that these “choices” spread disease, increase cancer risks and are mentally unhealthy.


12 posted on 06/02/2012 7:39:18 AM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It is none of your ****ing business doomberg!

LLS


13 posted on 06/02/2012 7:42:22 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Whether we consume too much sugar or not is not the province of government period.

.........................

It will be if SCOTUS doesn’t overturn bammycare.


14 posted on 06/02/2012 7:43:24 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"Nanny Bloomberg": The NYTimes Centerfold

‘Nanny Bloomberg’ wears dress in full-page New York Times ad

"Critics of New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg will relish opening a copy of Saturday’s New York Times.

The paper will feature a full-page color ad of Hizzoner wearing a dress, under the banner “The Nanny.”

The ad, paid for by the Center for Consumer Freedom, targets Bloomberg for his health-related proposal to ban the sale of sugared soft drinks in servings larger than 16 ounces."


15 posted on 06/02/2012 7:44:27 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If you want total security go to prison. The only thing lacking is freedom. D. D. Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

I’m glad that Mayor Bloomie recognizes that most New Yorkers aren’t smart enough to make simple health decisions.

Now if we can somehow get him to keep those folks from voting in federal elections...


16 posted on 06/02/2012 7:45:21 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

17 posted on 06/02/2012 7:47:02 AM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yes...the smoking ban was bad. I still oppose it. It is a violation of property rights. And I’m a non-smoker.

And, now, look at the precedent it set.


18 posted on 06/02/2012 7:48:07 AM PDT by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
IMHO, the major soda producers should simply stop shipping/selling their products and sponsoring charities and events in NYC.

Yes, it would cause a little dip in their bottom line, initially, but they're going to take a bigger hit when every other mayor in the country follows Bloomberg's lead knowing there are no consequences.

Some might object that move would be "punishing" the people of NYC, but they're the ones who installed this monster in the first place.

19 posted on 06/02/2012 7:48:59 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
And Bloomie has a lot more money than he needs.

And a lot more dachas.

And a lot more armed guards.

And a lot more Armani suits.

20 posted on 06/02/2012 7:50:11 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson